Is motor inhibition involved in the processing of sentential negation? An assessment via the Stop-Signal Task

[1]  M. Masuch,et al.  The Experience of Social Touch in Multi-User Virtual Reality , 2020, VRST.

[2]  J. A. García-Herrero,et al.  Well-Being and Throwing Speed of Women Handball Players Affected by Feedback , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[3]  René Westerhausen,et al.  Differences in unity: The go/no-go and stop signal tasks rely on different mechanisms , 2020, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. de Vega,et al.  The generalizability of inhibition-related processes in the comprehension of linguistic negation. ERP evidence from the Mandarin language , 2020, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.

[5]  M. de Vega,et al.  Brain Inhibitory Mechanisms Are Involved in the Processing of Sentential Negation, Regardless of Its Content. Evidence From EEG Theta and Beta Rhythms , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[6]  F. Caruana,et al.  Rethinking the abstract/concrete concepts dichotomy: Comment on "Words as social tools: Language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts" by Anna M. Borghi et al. , 2019, Physics of life reviews.

[7]  Hans Colonius,et al.  A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task , 2019, eLife.

[8]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  A consensus guide , 2019 .

[9]  Eduar Herrera,et al.  Negation markers inhibit motor routines during typing of manual action verbs , 2019, Cognition.

[10]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  Abstract, emotional and concrete concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors , 2018, PeerJ.

[11]  V. Cuccio.  Attention to Metaphor , 2018, Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication.

[12]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Flexibility in Language Action Interaction: The Influence of Movement Type , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  V. Gallese,et al.  A Peircean account of concepts: grounding abstraction in phylogeny through a comparative neuroscientific perspective , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  P. Pantano,et al.  Inhibition is impaired in children with obsessive‐compulsive symptoms but not in those with tics , 2018, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[15]  M. de Vega,et al.  Sentential negation modulates inhibition in a stop-signal task. Evidence from behavioral and ERP data , 2018, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  The Stop‐Signal Paradigm , 2018 .

[17]  V. Gallese,et al.  The neural exploitation hypothesis and its implications for an embodied approach to language and cognition: Insights from the study of action verbs processing and motor disorders in Parkinson's disease , 2018, Cortex.

[18]  F. Pulvermüller.  Neural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication , 2018, Progress in Neurobiology.

[19]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Abstract semantics in the motor system? – An event-related fMRI study on passive reading of semantic word categories carrying abstract emotional and mental meaning , 2017, Cortex.

[20]  M. Marchi,et al.  Language for action: Motor resonance during the processing of human and robotic voices , 2017, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  Ádám Takács,et al.  Do all inhibitions act alike? A study of go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms , 2017, PloS one.

[22]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Influence of finger and mouth action observation on random number generation: an instance of embodied cognition for abstract concepts , 2016, Psychological Research.

[23]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The challenge of abstract concepts. , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Lorella Battelli,et al.  The Default Computation of Negated Meanings , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Borghi,et al.  Grounding Abstractness: Abstract Concepts and the Activation of the Mouth , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[26]  M. de Vega,et al.  Sentential Negation Might Share Neurophysiological Mechanisms with Action Inhibition. Evidence from Frontal Theta Rhythm , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Brain basis of communicative actions in language , 2016, NeuroImage.

[28]  Yvonne Koch,et al.  Inhibitory Processes In Attention Memory And Language , 2016 .

[29]  J. Kenemans,et al.  Specific proactive and generic reactive inhibition , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[30]  L. Fogassi,et al.  How the Context Matters. Literal and Figurative Meaning in the Embodied Language Paradigm , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  Giovanni Mirabella,et al.  Should I stay or should I go? Conceptual underpinnings of goal-directed actions , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[32]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Modulation of Arm Reaching Movements during Processing of Arm/Hand-Related Action Verbs with and without Emotional Connotation , 2014, PloS one.

[33]  C. Santamaría,et al.  How negation is understood: Evidence from the visual world paradigm , 2014 .

[34]  P. Federico,et al.  Effects of probability bias in response readiness and response inhibition on reaching movements , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[36]  Joaquin A. Anguera,et al.  Reconciling the influence of task-set switching and motor inhibition processes on stop signal after-effects , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[37]  A. Aron,et al.  Proactive Selective Response Suppression Is Implemented via the Basal Ganglia , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  G. Semin,et al.  Comprehension of action negation involves inhibitory simulation , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  D. Perani,et al.  The disembodiment effect of negation: negating action-related sentences attenuates their interference on congruent upper limb movements. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  X.L. Chen,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation , 2013, Interventional Neurology.

[41]  Viviane Deprez,et al.  Grip Force Reveals the Context Sensitivity of Language-Induced Motor Activity during “Action Words” Processing: Evidence from Sentential Negation , 2012, PloS one.

[42]  V. Cuccio.  Is Embodiment All That We Need? Insights from the Acquisition of Negation , 2012, Biolinguistics.

[43]  S. Cappa,et al.  Action-related semantic content and negation polarity modulate motor areas during sentence reading: An event-related desynchronization study , 2012, Brain Research.

[44]  Yann Coello,et al.  Language and action in cognitive neuroscience , 2012 .

[45]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production , 2012, Cortex.

[46]  M. Manfredi,et al.  Deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nuclei affects arm response inhibition in Parkinson's patients. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  V. Gallese,et al.  Processing of Hand-Related Verbs Specifically Affects the Planning and Execution of Arm Reaching Movements , 2012, PloS one.

[48]  M. Trevisan,et al.  EsploraCoLFIS: Un’interfaccia web per le ricerche sul Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS) , 2012 .

[49]  V. Cuccio.  On Negation. What do we need to “say no”? , 2011 .

[50]  Marco Tullio Liuzza,et al.  Do Not Resonate with Actions: Sentence Polarity Modulates Cortico-Spinal Excitability during Action-Related Sentence Reading , 2011, PloS one.

[51]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Action language comprehension , affordances and goals . In , 2011 .

[52]  M. Vink,et al.  On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition , 2010, PloS one.

[53]  Mareike M. Menz,et al.  Grasping language – A short story on embodiment , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[54]  P. Weiss,et al.  To move or not to move: imperatives modulate action-related verb processing in the motor system , 2010, Neuroscience.

[55]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Hands on the future: facilitation of cortico‐spinal hand‐representation when reading the future tense of hand‐related action verbs , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[56]  Gregory Hickok,et al.  The role of mirror neurons in speech perception and action word semantics , 2010 .

[57]  Claudia Scorolli,et al.  Integrating Action and Language through Biased Competition , 2010, Front. Neurorobot..

[58]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Preparation to Inhibit a Response Complements Response Inhibition during Performance of a Stop-Signal Task , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[60]  G. Logan,et al.  Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  M. Bellgrove,et al.  Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[62]  L. Fadiga,et al.  The Motor Somatotopy of Speech Perception , 2009, Current Biology.

[63]  Pierpaolo Pani,et al.  Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[64]  Andrea Moro,et al.  Negation in the brain: Modulating action representations , 2008, NeuroImage.

[65]  S. Ferraina,et al.  Context influences on the preparation and execution of reaching movements , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[66]  V. Gallese.  Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis , 2008, Social neuroscience.

[67]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing , 2008, Brain and Language.

[68]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? , 2006 .

[69]  Pierpaolo Pani,et al.  Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[70]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[71]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Listening to Action-related Sentences Activates Fronto-parietal Motor Circuits , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[72]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Effects of Negation, Truth Value, and Delay on Picture Recognition after Reading Affirmative and Negative Sentences , 2005 .

[73]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: The N2/P3 complex further validated , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[74]  A. Vandierendonck,et al.  The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop task. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[75]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[76]  Charles Wallis,et al.  Computation and cognition , 2003, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[77]  Edgar Brunner,et al.  Nonparametric analysis of longitudinal data in factorial experiments , 2012 .

[78]  B. Kaup,et al.  Negation and its impact on the accessibility of text information , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[79]  Martina Rieger,et al.  Inhibitory after‐effects in the stop signal paradigm , 1999 .

[80]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[81]  Gerjan van Schaaik.  On negation , 1992, The Oxford Turkish Grammar.

[82]  Alexis Kalokerinos.  A natural history of negation , 1991 .

[83]  M. Just,et al.  Changes in activation levels with negation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[84]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Dependence and Independence in Responding to Double Stimulation : A Comparison of Stop , Change , and Dual-Task Paradigms , 1986 .

[85]  G. Logan.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[86]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[87]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[88]  C. Pollard,et al.  Center for the Study of Language and Information , 2022 .

[89]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. , 1975 .

[90]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  On the process of comparing sentences against pictures , 1972 .

[91]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[92]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[93]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.