Error Assessment for Emerging Traffic Data Collection Devices

Because access to travel time information can significantly influence the decision making of both agencies and travelers, accurate and reliable travel time information is increasingly needed. One important step in providing that information is to identify the sensors best suited to provide travel time data for a given corridor. Currently, few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of various travel time data collection technologies side-by-side. This evaluation was intended to provide decision support for transportation agencies looking to select travel time systems on the basis of accuracy, reliability, and cost. This study focused on two test corridors: State Route 522 (SR 522) (an urban arterial with frequent intersections) between the NE 153rd Street and 83rd Place NE intersections, and I-90 (rural freeway built over Snoqualmie Pass in the Cascade mountains) from milepost 109 (Ellensburg, Washington) to milepost 32 (North Bend, Wash). The sensor systems tested were Washington State Department of Transportation’s pre-existing automatic license plate reader (ALPR) system, Sensys emplacements, the TrafficCast BlueTOAD system, Blip Systems BlipTrack sensors, and a third-party feed from Inrix. This study’s approach was to look at the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD) to judge the expected magnitude of error, then examine the Mean Percent Error (MPE) to find any systematic biases in the data. The Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE) was useful for finding the relative magnitude of the error, and the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) was used to determine whether a few large errors or many smaller errors were occurring. Each system in the analysis demonstrated different strengths and weaknesses that should be considered in addition to its accuracy and sample rates. Some systems can provide additional data; others trade accuracy and coverage for cost or portability. Ultimately, engineers will need to weigh their requirements for accuracy and sample rates against the other engineering constraints imposed on their system.

[1]  Larry Rudolph,et al.  Bluetooth Essentials for Programmers , 2007 .

[2]  Ling-Jyh Chen,et al.  A Two-State Markov-Based Wireless Error Model for Bluetooth Networks , 2011, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[3]  J. Larkin,et al.  ON-TIME RELIABILITY IMPACTS OF ATIS, VOLUME III: IMPLICATIONS FOR ATIS INVESTMENT STRATEGIES , 2003 .

[4]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Real-Time Travel Time Estimates Using Media Access Control Address Matching , 2008 .

[5]  Hesham A Rakha,et al.  Estimating Traffic Stream Space Mean Speed and Reliability from Dual- and Single-Loop Detectors , 2005 .

[6]  Xiaolei Ma,et al.  DRIVE Net , 2011 .

[7]  M J Lighthill,et al.  On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads , 1955, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  Lee McCauley,et al.  Evaluation of automated license plate reader accuracy , 2009, 2009 9th International Conference on Telecommunication in Modern Satellite, Cable, and Broadcasting Services.

[9]  A Toppen,et al.  TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION FOR MEASUREMENT OF ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACCURACY , 2004 .

[10]  Satu Innamaa,et al.  Short-term prediction of traffic flow status for online driver information , 2009 .

[11]  A R Warner,et al.  Where the jobs are. , 1979, Imprint.

[12]  Mohamed El-Darieby,et al.  Bluetooth- and Wi-Fi-Based Mesh Network Platform for Traffic Monitoring , 2008 .

[13]  Marco Gramaglia,et al.  Virtual Induction Loops Based on Cooperative Vehicular Communications , 2013, Sensors.

[14]  Darcy M. Bullock,et al.  Continuing Evolution of Travel Time Data Information Collection and Processing , 2009 .