Building STEM Capability in a Robotic Arm Educational Competition

This paper investigated high school students’ STEM capability in a robotic arm educational competition. The learning design of the competition based on the pedagogy of copy and redesign, and social creativity framework. Students learned the process of building up robotic arms by copying instructors’ examples, discussing possible ways of redesigning the robotic arms. The students need to present their creativity by using robotic arms as boundary objects in a collaboration. After a one-day workshop and another one-day competition, the observation results showed that students were capable of exhibiting unique creativity to solve the problem during the competition, such as refining the robotic arms to grab something which it had not been able to reach, or adding materials on the robots to create a better user experience. Students also applied scientific and mathematical knowledge to improve the robots, performed integrated STEM ability. Furthermore, students’ meta-cognitive strategies of taking notes and collaboration were evidenced. It indicated that the copy and redesign, and social creativity framework can facilitate students’ creative performance of STEM capability. Moreover, as the study adopted students’ attitudes towards STEM survey, the results showed that students’ attitudes towards STEM had no significance after the curriculum design. The possible reasons included that short-term learning process might have minor influence on students’ STEM attitudes. Other possible reasons might be the ceiling effect, and small number of samples. Future study was suggested to evaluate the learning design into a long-term curriculum, adopt semi-structured interview to investigate more delicate relationship between the learning design and students’ performance, and conduct STEM ability test to understand students’ performance.

[1]  Y. Engeström Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. , 2001 .

[2]  Erica N. Walker Rethinking Professional Development for Elementary Mathematics Teachers. , 2007 .

[3]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  The Development and Validation of a Measure of Student Attitudes Toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (S-STEM) , 2015 .

[4]  Tamara J. Moore,et al.  Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education , 2012 .

[5]  Juing-Huei Su,et al.  A Contest-Oriented Project for Learning Intelligent Mobile Robots , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[6]  Jimmie Manning,et al.  In Vivo Coding , 2017 .

[7]  Kiyoshi Nagai Learning while doing: practical robotics education , 2001, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[8]  S. Selcen Guzey,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Assess Attitudes toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). , 2014 .

[9]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Beyond usability evaluation: analysis of human-robot interaction at a major robotics competition , 2004 .

[10]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  The Role of Robotics Teams’ Collaboration Quality on Team Performance in a Robotics Tournament , 2017 .

[11]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Social creativity: turning barriers into opportunities for collaborative design , 2004, PDC 04.

[12]  Demetra Evangelou,et al.  Practicing engineering while building with blocks: identifying engineering thinking , 2016 .

[13]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Analysis of Human‐robot Interaction at the DARPA Robotics Challenge Trials , 2015, J. Field Robotics.

[14]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Knowledge construction in software development: the evolving artifact approach , 1996 .

[15]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Behavioral observation and coding. , 2000 .

[16]  Luis Ariel Mesa Mesa,et al.  Engineering for children by using robotics , 2017 .

[17]  Tessa V. West,et al.  Behavioral observation and coding , 2014 .

[18]  Lee Martin,et al.  The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education , 2015 .

[19]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework , 2013, Education and Information Technologies.

[20]  Merredith Portsmore,et al.  Bringing Engineering to Elementary School , 2004 .

[21]  Secondary Education. Office for Career Massachusetts science and technology/engineering curriculum framework , 2006 .

[22]  R. Gold Roles in Sociological Field Observations , 1958 .

[23]  Masanori Sugimoto,et al.  Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  M. Resnick,et al.  Designing for Tinkerability , 2013 .

[25]  Pao-Nan Chou,et al.  Skill Development and Knowledge Acquisition Cultivated by Maker Education: Evidence from Arduino-based Educational Robotics , 2018, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.

[26]  Robert Avanzato Mobile Robot Navigation Contest For Undergraduate Design And K 12 Outreach , 2002 .

[27]  Theodore J. Kopcha,et al.  Developing an Integrative STEM Curriculum for Robotics Education Through Educational Design Research , 2017 .

[28]  Kao-Shing Hwang,et al.  Rapid Prototyping Platform for Robotics Applications , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[29]  Yu-Liang Ting,et al.  English -learning mobile app designing for engineering students’ cross-disciplinary learning and collaboration , 2019, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

[30]  M. Bers The TangibleK Robotics Program: Applied Computational Thinking for Young Children. , 2010 .