Performance comparison of second- and third-generation sequencers using a bacterial genome with two chromosomes

BackgroundThe availability of diverse second- and third-generation sequencing technologies enables the rapid determination of the sequences of bacterial genomes. However, identifying the sequencing technology most suitable for producing a finished genome with multiple chromosomes remains a challenge. We evaluated the abilities of the following three second-generation sequencers: Roche 454 GS Junior (GS Jr), Life Technologies Ion PGM (Ion PGM), and Illumina MiSeq (MiSeq) and a third-generation sequencer, the Pacific Biosciences RS sequencer (PacBio), by sequencing and assembling the genome of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, which consists of a 5-Mb genome comprising two circular chromosomes.ResultsWe sequenced the genome of V. parahaemolyticus with GS Jr, Ion PGM, MiSeq, and PacBio and performed de novo assembly with several genome assemblers. Although GS Jr generated the longest mean read length of 418 bp among the second-generation sequencers, the maximum contig length of the best assembly from GS Jr was 165 kbp, and the number of contigs was 309. Single runs of Ion PGM and MiSeq produced data of considerably greater sequencing coverage, 279× and 1,927×, respectively. The optimized result for Ion PGM contained 61 contigs assembled from reads of 77× coverage, and the longest contig was 895 kbp in size. Those for MiSeq were 34 contigs, 58× coverage, and 733 kbp, respectively. These results suggest that higher coverage depth is unnecessary for a better assembly result. We observed that multiple rRNA coding regions were fragmented in the assemblies from the second-generation sequencers, whereas PacBio generated two exceptionally long contigs of 3,288,561 and 1,875,537 bps, each of which was from a single chromosome, with 73× coverage and mean read length 3,119 bp, allowing us to determine the absolute positions of all rRNA operons.ConclusionsPacBio outperformed the other sequencers in terms of the length of contigs and reconstructed the greatest portion of the genome, achieving a genome assembly of “finished grade” because of its long reads. It showed the potential to assemble more complex genomes with multiple chromosomes containing more repetitive sequences.

[1]  Mark J. P. Chaisson,et al.  De novo fragment assembly with short mate-paired reads: Does the read length matter? , 2009, Genome research.

[2]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. , 2009, Genome research.

[3]  M. B. Couger,et al.  The Genome of the Anaerobic Fungus Orpinomyces sp. Strain C1A Reveals the Unique Evolutionary History of a Remarkable Plant Biomass Degrader , 2013, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[4]  Nancy F. Hansen,et al.  Accurate Whole Human Genome Sequencing using Reversible Terminator Chemistry , 2008, Nature.

[5]  Jenny Shu,et al.  Efficient and accurate whole genome assembly and methylome profiling of E. coli , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[6]  A. Gnirke,et al.  High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Daniel R. Zerbino,et al.  Pebble and Rock Band: Heuristic Resolution of Repeats and Scaffolding in the Velvet Short-Read de Novo Assembler , 2009, PloS one.

[8]  Timothy P. L. Smith,et al.  Reducing assembly complexity of microbial genomes with single-molecule sequencing , 2013, Genome Biology.

[9]  Bernard P. Puc,et al.  An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing , 2011, Nature.

[10]  Juliane C. Dohm,et al.  Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  Margaret C. Linak,et al.  Sequence-specific error profile of Illumina sequencers , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  A. Kasarskis,et al.  A window into third-generation sequencing. , 2010, Human molecular genetics.

[13]  E. Birney,et al.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. , 2008, Genome research.

[14]  H. Swerdlow,et al.  A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[15]  T. Dallman,et al.  Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Abyss: a Parallel Assembler for Short Read Sequence Data Material Supplemental Open Access , 2022 .

[17]  M. Schatz,et al.  Hybrid error correction and de novo assembly of single-molecule sequencing reads , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[18]  T. Glenn.  Field guide to next‐generation DNA sequencers , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[19]  S. Turner,et al.  Real-Time DNA Sequencing from Single Polymerase Molecules , 2009, Science.

[20]  D. Dressman,et al.  Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  James R. Knight,et al.  Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors , 2005, Nature.

[22]  Alexey A. Gurevich,et al.  QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies , 2013, Bioinform..

[23]  Inanç Birol,et al.  Assemblathon 2: evaluating de novo methods of genome assembly in three vertebrate species , 2013, GigaScience.

[24]  Huanming Yang,et al.  De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. , 2010, Genome research.

[25]  James H. Bullard,et al.  A hybrid approach for the automated finishing of bacterial genomes , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  James R. Knight,et al.  High-coverage sequencing and annotated assemblies of the budgerigar genome , 2014, GigaScience.

[27]  Simona Soverini,et al.  Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Systems , 2013 .

[28]  Masahira Hattori,et al.  Genome sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a pathogenic mechanism distinct from that of V cholerae , 2003, The Lancet.

[29]  Aaron A. Klammer,et al.  Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data , 2013, Nature Methods.

[30]  Mihai Pop,et al.  Assessing the benefits of using mate-pairs to resolve repeats in de novo short-read prokaryotic assemblies , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.