Brief Report: Generalisation of Word–Picture Relations in Children with Autism and Typically Developing Children

We investigated whether low-functioning children with autism generalise labels from colour photographs based on sameness of shape, colour, or both. Children with autism and language-matched controls were taught novel words paired with photographs of unfamiliar objects, and then sorted pictures and objects into two buckets according to whether or not they were also referents of the newly-learned labels. Stimuli matched depicted referents on shape and/or colour. Children with autism extended labels to items that matched depicted objects on shape and colour, but also frequently generalised to items that matched on only shape or colour. Controls only generalised labels to items that matched the depicted referent’s shape. Thus, low-functioning children with autism may not understand that shape constrains symbolic word–picture–object relations.

[1]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Object name Learning Provides On-the-Job Training for Attention , 2002, Psychological science.

[2]  G. Dawson,et al.  Prototype formation in autism , 2001, Development and Psychopathology.

[3]  Melissa Allen Preissler Associative learning of pictures and words by low-functioning children with autism , 2008, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[4]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Early noun vocabularies: do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond? , 1999, Cognition.

[5]  E. Schopler,et al.  Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) , 1980, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[6]  S. Carey,et al.  Do Both Pictures and Words Function as Symbols for 18- and 24-Month-Old Children? , 2004 .

[7]  A. Couteur,et al.  Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders , 1994, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[8]  U. Frith,et al.  Language and communication in autistic disorders. , 1994, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  Susan A. Sullivan,et al.  Leiter International Performance Scale–Revised , 1998 .

[10]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Do children with autism spectrum disorders show a shape bias in word learning? , 2008, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[11]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Generalizing from Simple Instances: An Uncomplicated Lesson from Kids Learning Object Categories , 2006 .

[12]  P. Bloom Mindreading, Communication and the Learning of Names for Things , 2002 .

[13]  B. Younger,et al.  Infant categorization: memory for category-level and specific item information. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The importance of shape in early lexical learning , 1988 .

[15]  Calum Hartley,et al.  Symbolic Understanding of Pictures in Low-Functioning Children with Autism: The Effects of Iconicity and Naming , 2015, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[16]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Do children with autism use the speaker's direction of gaze strategy to crack the code of language? , 1997, Child development.

[17]  R. Joseph,et al.  Holistic and part-based face recognition in children with autism. , 2003, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[18]  Andrew Pickles,et al.  Patterns of growth in verbal abilities among children with autism spectrum disorder. , 2007, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[19]  Jules Davidoff,et al.  Similarity and categorisation: neuropsychological evidence for a dissociation in explicit categorisation tasks , 1999, Cognition.

[20]  M. Posner,et al.  Retention of Abstract Ideas. , 1970 .