On the Value of Job Migration in Online Makespan Minimization

Makespan minimization on identical parallel machines is a classical scheduling problem. We consider the online scenario where a sequence of n jobs has to be scheduled non-preemptively on m machines so as to minimize the maximum completion time of any job. The best competitive ratio that can be achieved by deterministic online algorithms is in the range [1.88, 1.9201]. Currently no randomized online algorithm with a smaller competitiveness is known, for general m. In this paper we explore the power of job migration, i.e. an online scheduler is allowed to perform a limited number of job reassignments. Migration is a common technique used in theory and practice to balance load in parallel processing environments. As our main result we settle the performance that can be achieved by deterministic online algorithms. We develop an algorithm that is $$\alpha _m$$αm-competitive, for any $$m\ge 2$$m≥2, where $$\alpha _m$$αm is the solution of a certain equation. For $$m=2$$m=2, $$\alpha _2 = 4/3$$α2=4/3 and $$\lim _{m\rightarrow \infty } \alpha _m = W_{-1}(-1/e^2)/(1+ W_{-1}(-1/e^2)) \approx 1.4659$$limm→∞αm=W-1(-1/e2)/(1+W-1(-1/e2))≈1.4659. Here $$W_{-1}$$W-1 is the lower branch of the Lambert W function. For $$m\ge 11$$m≥11, the algorithm uses at most 7m migration operations. For smaller m, 8m to 10m operations may be performed. We complement this result by a matching lower bound: No online algorithm that uses o(n) job migrations can achieve a competitive ratio smaller than $$\alpha _m$$αm. We finally trade performance for migrations. We give a family of algorithms that is c-competitive, for any $$5/3\le c \le 2$$5/3≤c≤2. For $$c= 5/3$$c=5/3, the strategy uses at most 4m job migrations. For $$c=1.75$$c=1.75, at most 2.5m migrations are used.

[1]  Gerhard J. Woeginger,et al.  An optimal algorithm for preemptive on-line scheduling , 1995, Oper. Res. Lett..

[2]  Ronald L. Graham,et al.  Bounds for certain multiprocessing anomalies , 1966 .

[3]  Eric Torng,et al.  Generating adversaries for request-answer games , 2000, SODA '00.

[4]  Martin Skutella,et al.  Online Scheduling with Bounded Migration , 2004, ICALP.

[5]  Gerhard J. Woeginger,et al.  A Lower Bound for Randomized On-Line Scheduling Algorithms , 1994, Information Processing Letters.

[6]  Matthias Englert,et al.  The Power of Reordering for Online Minimum Makespan Scheduling , 2008, 2008 49th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[7]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The load rebalancing problem , 2003, SPAA '03.

[8]  Jirí Sgall A Lower Bound for Randomized On-Line Multiprocessor Scheduling , 1997, Inf. Process. Lett..

[9]  Gerhard J. Woeginger,et al.  An On-Line Scheduling Heuristic With Better Worst Case Ratio Than Graham's List Scheduling , 1993, SIAM J. Comput..

[10]  Robert E. Tarjan,et al.  Amortized efficiency of list update and paging rules , 1985, CACM.

[11]  György Turán,et al.  On the performance of on-line algorithms for partition problems , 1989, Acta Cybern..

[12]  Ramaswamy Chandrasekaran,et al.  Improved Bounds for the Online Scheduling Problem , 2003, SIAM J. Comput..

[13]  Susanne Albers,et al.  Better bounds for online scheduling , 1997, STOC '97.

[14]  Shaohua Yu,et al.  Online scheduling with reassignment , 2008, Oper. Res. Lett..

[15]  Ronald L. Graham,et al.  Bounds on Multiprocessing Timing Anomalies , 1969, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics.

[16]  Rudolf Fleischer,et al.  On‐line scheduling revisited , 2000 .

[17]  Gerhard J. Woeginger,et al.  An Optimal Algorithm for Preemptive On-line Scheduling , 1994, ESA.

[18]  David R. Karger,et al.  A better algorithm for an ancient scheduling problem , 1994, SODA '94.

[19]  Rudolf Fleischer,et al.  Online Scheduling Revisited , 2000, ESA.

[20]  Amos Fiat,et al.  New algorithms for an ancient scheduling problem , 1992, STOC '92.

[21]  E. Cesàro,et al.  Sur la série harmonique , 1885 .

[22]  Jing Liu,et al.  Optimal semi-online algorithms for scheduling problems with reassignment on two identical machines , 2011, Inf. Process. Lett..

[23]  David B. Shmoys,et al.  Using dual approximation algorithms for scheduling problems: Theoretical and practical results , 1985, 26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1985).

[24]  Yuval Rabani,et al.  A Better Lower Bound for On-Line Scheduling , 1994, Inf. Process. Lett..