Measurement Science for Prognostics and Health Management for Smart Manufacturing Systems: Key Findings from a Roadmapping Workshop

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) hosted the Roadmapping Workshop – Measurement Science for Prognostics and Health Management for Smart Manufacturing Systems (PHM4SMS) in Fall 2014 to discuss the needs and priorities of stakeholders in the PHM4SMS technology area. The workshop brought together over 70 members of the PHM community. The attendees included representatives from small, medium, and large manufacturers; technology developers and integrators; academic researchers; government organizations; trade associations; and standards bodies. The attendees discussed the current and anticipated measurement science challenges to advance PHM methods and techniques for smart manufacturing systems; the associated research and development needed to implement condition monitoring, diagnostic, and prognostic technologies within manufacturing environments; and the priorities to meet the needs of PHM in manufacturing. This paper will summarize the key findings of this workshop, and present some of the critical measurement science challenges and corresponding roadmaps, i.e., suggested courses of action, to advance PHM for manufacturing. Milestones and targeted capabilities will be presented for each roadmap across three areas: PHM Manufacturing Process Techniques; PHM Performance Assessment; and PHM Infrastructure – Hardware, Software, and Integration. An analysis of these roadmaps and crosscutting themes seen across the breakout sessions is also discussed.

[1]  M. Uslenghi,et al.  The World Space Observatory (WSO-UV) - Current status , 2008, 0801.2080.

[2]  Z. Yang,et al.  A Review of Current Prognostics and Health Management System Related Standards , 2013 .

[3]  Dragan Banjevic,et al.  Minor maintenance actions and their impact on diagnostic and prognostic CBM models , 2012, J. Intell. Manuf..

[4]  Narayan Srinivasa,et al.  Real-Time Diagnostics, Prognostics and Health Management for Large-Scale Manufacturing Maintenance Systems , 2008 .

[5]  Ying Peng,et al.  Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: a review , 2010 .

[6]  Brian A. Weiss,et al.  Standards Related to Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) for Manufacturing , 2014 .

[7]  Zhigang Tian,et al.  Condition based maintenance optimization considering multiple objectives , 2009, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[8]  Brian A. Weiss,et al.  Standards for Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) Techniques within Manufacturing Operations , 2014 .

[9]  Jay Lee,et al.  Intelligent prognostics tools and e-maintenance , 2006, Comput. Ind..

[10]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  System health monitoring and prognostics — a review of current paradigms and practices , 2006 .

[11]  Joan Pellegrino,et al.  Measurement Science Roadmap for Prognostics and Health Management for Smart Manufacturing Systems , 2016 .

[12]  Jay Lee,et al.  Self-maintenance and engineering immune systems: Towards smarter machines and manufacturing systems , 2011, Annu. Rev. Control..

[13]  M.J. Roemer,et al.  Prognostic enhancements to diagnostic systems for improved condition-based maintenance [military aircraft] , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[14]  Shahrul Kamaruddin,et al.  An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Yong-June Shin,et al.  Design of advanced time-frequency mutual information measures for aerospace diagnostics and prognostics , 2011, 2011 Aerospace Conference.

[16]  Benoît Iung,et al.  On the concept of e-maintenance: Review and current research , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..