DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameter maps for cervical carcinoma prediction

Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) time course data enable the physio-biological interpretation of tissue angiogenesis. This study aims to develop machine learning approaches for cervical carcinoma prediction based on pharmacokinetic parameters. The performance of individual parameters was assessed in terms of their efficacy in differentiating cancerous tissue from normal cervix tissue. The effect of combining parameters was evaluated using the following two approaches: the first approach was based on support vector machines (SVMs) to combine the parameters from one pharmacokinetic model or across several models; the second approach was based on a novel method called APITL (artificial pharmacokinetic images for transfer learning), which was designed to fully utilize the comprehensive pharmacokinetic information acquired from DCE-MRI data. A "winner-takes-all" strategy was employed to consolidate the slice-wise prediction into subject-wise prediction. Experiments were carried out with a dataset comprising 36 patients with cervical cancer and 17 healthy subjects. The results demonstrated that parameter Ve, representing volume fraction of the extracellular extravascular space (EES), attained high discriminative power regardless of the pharmacokinetic model used for estimation. An approximately 10% improvement in the accuracy was achieved with the SVM approach. The APITL method further outperformed SVM and attained a subject-wise prediction accuracy of 94.3%. Our experiment demonstrated that APITL could predict cervical carcinoma with high accuracy and had potential in clinical applications.

[1]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[2]  Mohammad Teshnehlab,et al.  Breast cancer diagnosis in DCE-MRI using mixture ensemble of convolutional neural networks , 2017, Pattern Recognit..

[3]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[4]  Kari Tanderup,et al.  Are complex DCE‐MRI models supported by clinical data? , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  M. Gee Targeting the Mitotic Catastrophe Signaling Pathway in Cancer , 2015 .

[6]  A. Jackson,et al.  Modeling of contrast agent kinetics in the lung using T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  J. Berek,et al.  Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri , 2019, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[8]  Knut Kvaal,et al.  Classification of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR Images of Cervical Cancers Using Texture Analysis and Support Vector Machines , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Kari Tanderup,et al.  Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of locally advanced cervical cancer , 2014, Acta oncologica.

[11]  Bart M. ter Haar Romeny,et al.  Pharmacokinetic models in clinical practice: What model to use for DCE-MRI of the breast? , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[12]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  An Adiabatic Approximation to the Tissue Homogeneity Model for Water Exchange in the Brain: I. Theoretical Derivation , 1998, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[13]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition , 2014, ICLR.

[14]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[15]  C. Thng,et al.  Fundamentals of tracer kinetics for dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  V. Goh,et al.  Primary colorectal cancer: use of kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT data to predict clinical outcome. , 2013, Radiology.

[17]  E. Parzen On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode , 1962 .

[18]  Wei Huang,et al.  DCE-MRI Texture Features for Early Prediction of Breast Cancer Therapy Response , 2017, Tomography.

[19]  Yuwei Xia,et al.  Radiomics Analysis of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Prediction of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[20]  C. Thng,et al.  Hepatic metastases: in vivo assessment of perfusion parameters at dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging with dual-input two-compartment tracer kinetics model. , 2008, Radiology.

[21]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Eric A. Cohen,et al.  Prediction of Treatment Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer via Early Changes in Tumor Heterogeneity Captured by DCE-MRI Registration , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Benjamin Q. Huynh,et al.  SU-D-207B-06: Predicting Breast Cancer Malignancy On DCE-MRI Data Using Pre-Trained Convolutional Neural Networks. , 2016, Medical physics.

[24]  Xiangyu Yang,et al.  Prediction of chemotherapeutic response in bladder cancer using K‐means clustering of dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI pharmacokinetic parameters , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  A. Holland,et al.  The impact of mitotic errors on cell proliferation and tumorigenesis , 2018, Genes & development.

[26]  Mario Sansone,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer: A comparison between distributed and compartmental tracer kinetic models , 2012 .

[27]  Dongqing Zhang,et al.  Temporal Analysis of Tumor Heterogeneity and Volume for Cervical Cancer Treatment Outcome Prediction: Preliminary Evaluation , 2010, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[28]  W. Yuh,et al.  Validation of optimal DCE-MRI perfusion threshold to classify at-risk tumor imaging voxels in heterogeneous cervical cancer for outcome prediction. , 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  Kaiming He,et al.  Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretraining , 2018, ECCV.

[30]  Eun Jung Choi,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of early and late recurrences in breast cancer , 2016, Medicine.

[31]  Jian Z. Wang,et al.  Characterizing tumor heterogeneity with functional imaging and quantifying high-risk tumor volume for early prediction of treatment outcome: cervical cancer as a model. , 2012, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[32]  P S Tofts,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Gd‐DTPA Enhancement in Breast Tumors Using a Permeability Model , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[34]  Xia Li,et al.  Distinguishing benign and malignant breast tumors: preliminary comparison of kinetic modeling approaches using multi-institutional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data from the International Breast MR Consortium 6883 trial , 2018, Journal of medical imaging.

[35]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[36]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[37]  S. Sourbron,et al.  A comparison of tracer kinetic models for T1‐weighted dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI: Application in carcinoma of the cervix , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Tumor radiomic heterogeneity: Multiparametric functional imaging to characterize variability and predict response following cervical cancer radiation therapy , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  Tong San Koh,et al.  On the a Priori Identifiability of the Two-Compartment Distributed Parameter Model From Residual Tracer Data Acquired by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[40]  L R Schad,et al.  Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[41]  Wei Huang,et al.  Early Prediction and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Quantitative DCE-MRI1 , 2016, Translational oncology.

[42]  John Platt,et al.  Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods , 1999 .