Disruption of Right Prefrontal Cortex by Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Induces Risk-Taking Behavior

Decisions require careful weighing of the risks and benefits associated with a choice. Some people need to be offered large rewards to balance even minimal risks, whereas others take great risks in the hope for an only minimal benefit. We show here that risk-taking is a modifiable behavior that depends on right hemisphere prefrontal activity. We used low-frequency, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to transiently disrupt left or right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) function before applying a well known gambling paradigm that provides a measure of decision-making under risk. Individuals displayed significantly riskier decision-making after disruption of the right, but not the left, DLPFC. Our findings suggest that the right DLPFC plays a crucial role in the suppression of superficially seductive options. This confirms the asymmetric role of the prefrontal cortex in decision-making and reveals that this fundamental human capacity can be manipulated in normal subjects through cortical stimulation. The ability to modify risk-taking behavior may be translated into therapeutic interventions for disorders such as drug abuse or pathological gambling.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk. , 1983 .

[2]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[3]  A. Damasio.  The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  A. Damasio,et al.  Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  R. Robinson,et al.  Mechanism of disinhibition after brain lesions. , 1997, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[6]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  T. Robbins,et al.  Choosing between Small, Likely Rewards and Large, Unlikely Rewards Activates Inferior and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower. , 1999, Psychological review.

[9]  E. Stein,et al.  Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Responses: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  T. Robbins,et al.  Decision making and neuropsychiatry , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Daniel Tranel,et al.  Asymmetric Functional Roles of Right and Left Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortices in Social Conduct, Decision-Making, and Emotional Processing , 2002, Cortex.

[13]  H. Barbas,et al.  Pathways for emotion: interactions of prefrontal and anterior temporal pathways in the amygdala of the rhesus monkey , 2002, Neuroscience.

[14]  Monique Ernst,et al.  Decision-making in a Risk-taking Task: A PET Study , 2002, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[15]  T. Robbins,et al.  Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  A. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Studies in Cognition: The Problems Solved and Created by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Luke Clark,et al.  The contributions of lesion laterality and lesion volume to decision-making impairment following frontal lobe damage , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  JaneR . Taylor,et al.  Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: a critical period of addiction vulnerability. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[20]  A. Gershon,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[21]  Xingbao Li,et al.  Acute left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation in depressed patients is associated with immediately increased activity in prefrontal cortical as well as subcortical regions , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[22]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Conflict and Habit: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach to the Self , 2004 .

[23]  R. Davidson.  What does the prefrontal cortex “do” in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research , 2004, Biological Psychology.

[24]  Peter Brugger,et al.  Suppressing versus releasing a habit: frequency-dependent effects of prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  A. Bechara.  Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Antonio Damasio,et al.  The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision , 2005, Games Econ. Behav..

[27]  Carlo Contoreggi,et al.  Risky decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex in abstinent drug abusers and nonusers. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  Bruno Weber,et al.  Lateralized and frequency-dependent effects of prefrontal rTMS on regional cerebral blood flow , 2006, NeuroImage.