Accuracy of isoflurane, halothane, and sevoflurane vaporizers during high oxygen flow and at maximum vaporizer dial setting.

OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of isoflurane, halothane, and sevoflurane vaporizers during high oxygen flow and at maximum dial settings at room temperature and to test sevoflurane vaporizers similarly during heating and at low-fill states. SAMPLE 5 isoflurane, 5 halothane, and 5 sevoflurane vaporizers. PROCEDURES Vaporizers were tested at an oxygen flow of 10 L/min and maximum dial settings for 15 minutes under various conditions. All 3 vaporizer types were filled and tested at room temperature (21° to 23°C). Filled sevoflurane vaporizers were wrapped with circulating hot water (42°C) blankets for 2 hours and tested similarly, and near-empty sevoflurane vaporizers were tested similarly at room temperature. During each 15-minute test period, anesthetic agent concentration was measured at the common gas outlet with a portable refractometer and temperature of the vaporizer wall was measured with a thermistor. RESULTS For each vaporizer type, anesthetic agent concentrations and vaporizer wall temperatures decreased during the 15-minute test period. Accuracy of isoflurane and halothane vaporizers remained within the recommended 20% (plus or minus) deviation from dial settings. Heated and room-temperature sevoflurane vaporizers were accurate to within 23% and 11.7% (plus or minus) of dial settings, respectively. Sevoflurane vaporizers at low-fill states performed similarly to vaporizers at full-fill states. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Under these study conditions, the isoflurane and halothane vaporizer models tested were accurate but the sevoflurane vaporizers were not. Sevoflurane vaporizer accuracy was not affected by fill state but may be improved with vaporizer heating; measurements of inspired anesthetic agent concentrations should be obtained during the use of heated vaporizers.

[1]  M. Tokuriki,et al.  Isoflurane anaesthesia in four sea lions (Otaria byronia and Zalophus californianus). , 2006, Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia.

[2]  T. Ambrisko,et al.  Evaluation of isoflurane and sevoflurane vaporizers over a wide range of oxygen flow rates. , 2006, American journal of veterinary research.

[3]  G. Drummond,et al.  Randomized comparison of three methods of induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane. , 2005, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  C. F. Wallroth,et al.  Refractive indices for volatile anesthetic gases: Equipment and method for calibrating vaporizers and monitors , 1995, Journal of Clinical Monitoring.

[5]  D. Sanders,et al.  The output of two sevoflurane vaporizers in the presence of helium. , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[6]  M. Seropian,et al.  Smaller-than-Expected Sevoflurane Concentrations Using the Sevotec 5® Vaporizer at Low Fill States and High Fresh Gas Flows , 2000, Anesthesia and Analgesia.

[7]  R. Epstein,et al.  High concentration versus incremental induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane in children: a comparison of induction times, vital signs, and complications. , 1998, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[8]  J. M. Allison,et al.  Determination of anaesthetic agent concentration by refractometry. , 1995, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  E. Steffey,et al.  Accuracy of isoflurane delivery by halothane-specific vaporizers. , 1983, American journal of veterinary research.

[10]  E. Steffey,et al.  Evaluation of an isoflurane vaporizer: the Cyprane Fortec. , 1982, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  E. Steffey,et al.  Rate of change of halothane concentration in a large animal circle anesthetic system. , 1977, American journal of veterinary research.