A cost-outcome approach to pre and post-implementation of national sports injury prevention programmes.

In New Zealand (NZ), the Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC) has developed a pre and post-implementation cost-outcome formulae for sport injury prevention to provide information regarding the success of a prevention programme. The ACC provides for the cost of all personal injuries in NZ and invests in prevention programmes to offset 1.6 million annual claims that cost $NZD 1.9 billion. The ACC invests in nine national community sport injury prevention programmes that represent 40% of sport claims and costs. Pre-implementation is used to determine the decision whether to invest in implementation and to determine the level of such investment for the injury prevention programme. Post-implementation is calculated two ways: unadjusted, assuming ceteris paribus; and adjusted assuming no prevention programme was in place. Post-implementation formulae provide a return on investment (ROI) for each dollar invested in the programme and cost-savings. The cost-outcome formulae approach allows ACC to manage expectations of the prevention programme as well as when it will provide a ROI, allowing it to take a long-term view for investment in sport injury prevention. Originally developed for its sport injury prevention programmes, the cost-outcome formulae have now been applied to the other prevention programmes ACC invests in such as home, road and workplace injury prevention.

[1]  P Scuffham,et al.  New Zealand bicycle helmet law—do the costs outweigh the benefits? , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[2]  W. van Mechelen,et al.  Sports Injury Surveillance Systems , 1997 .

[3]  M. Gold Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine , 2016 .

[4]  P. Kannus,et al.  Is it Possible to Prevent Sports Injuries? , 2002, Sports medicine.

[5]  W. Mechelen,et al.  Incidence, Severity, Aetiology and Prevention of Sports Injuries , 1992 .

[6]  E. Love,et al.  Athletic Injury Reporting , 1997, Sports medicine.

[7]  Jiri Dvorak,et al.  Soccer Injuries , 2004, Sports medicine.

[8]  P F Vinger,et al.  Ocular sports injuries. Economic considerations. , 1981, International ophthalmology clinics.

[9]  T. Miller,et al.  Cost-outcome analysis in injury prevention and control: eighty-four recent estimates for the United States. , 2000, Medical care.

[10]  Craig R. Denegar,et al.  Prophylactic Ankle Taping and Bracing: A Numbers-Needed-to-Treat and Cost-Benefit Analysis. , 2004, Journal of athletic training.

[11]  D J Chalmers,et al.  Injury prevention in sport: not yet part of the game? , 2002, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[12]  A. J. van der Beek,et al.  An economic evaluation of a proprioceptive balance board training programme for the prevention of ankle sprains in volleyball , 2005, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[13]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Cost effectiveness of adding magnetic resonance imaging to the usual management of suspected scaphoid fractures , 2005, British Journal of Sports Medicine.