Why Increased Social Presence through Web Videoconferencing Does Not Automatically Lead to Improved Learning

The Community of Inquiry (CoI) model provides a well-researched theoretical framework to understand how learners and teachers interact and learn together in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). Most CoI research focuses on asynchronous learning. However, with the arrival of easy-to-use synchronous communication tools the relevance of the CoI model needs verification for these new environments. Synchronous communication is (assumed to be) superior in establishing discourse due to the ability to express immediate feedback, intonation, body language, and thus the affordance to increase social presence. In a quasi-experimental design, this research analysed whether increased social presence led to (perceived) improved learning satisfaction and an increased pass rate. That is, the learning experiences of 147 students using discussion forums (2005–2007) and 256 students using both discussion forums and web-videoconferencing (2008–2011) over seven consecutive summers were compared using the self-developed Students Evaluation of Online Remedial Education Experience questionnaire. Results indicate that students in the web-videoconference design were not more satisfied about their learning experiences, except for the clarity of goals and tasks. Furthermore, in the four years of using the web-videoconference design, a lower pass rate was found compared to the discussion forum-only designs in the years before. Although web-videoconferencing provides an experience that seems more conducive to social presence, more research is needed into how to effectively use synchronous communication in e-learning.

[1]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  Longitudinal Study of Online Remedial Education Effects , 2008 .

[2]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments , 2006 .

[3]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  Redesigning teaching presence in order to enhance cognitive presence: a longitudinal analysis , 2013 .

[4]  D. Wood,et al.  ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: Problem based learning , 2003 .

[5]  D. Allen,et al.  What is Problem-Based Learning? , 2006 .

[6]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  Design exemplars for synchronous e-learning: A design theory approach , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[7]  P. Rogers,et al.  Social presence in distributed group environments: The role of social identity , 2005, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[9]  Hans Spada,et al.  Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated Knowledge Communication , 2005 .

[10]  Jürgen Wegge,et al.  Goal setting via videoconferencing , 2007 .

[11]  Monique Hanslo,et al.  From peripheral to full participation in a blended trade bargaining simulation , 2004, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[12]  E. Deci,et al.  Handbook of Self-Determination Research , 2002 .

[13]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  Remedial Online Teaching on a Summer Course , 2006 .

[15]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  Social Presence, Web Videoconferencing and Learning in Virtual Teams , 2009 .

[16]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Social presence in online discussion groups: testing three conceptions and their relations to perceived learning , 2008 .

[17]  Mien Segers,et al.  Evaluating the effects of redesigning a problem-based learning environment , 2003 .

[18]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  C. Haythornthwaite Online Personal Networks , 2000 .

[20]  Nikol Rummel,et al.  Instructional Support for Collaboration in Desktop Videoconference Settings , 2005 .

[21]  C. Tu,et al.  The Relationship of Social Presence and Interaction in Online Classes , 2002 .

[22]  Kuan-Chung Chen,et al.  Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Zehra Akyol,et al.  Educational Communities of Inquiry: Theoretical Framework, Research and Practice. , 2013 .

[24]  H. Schmidt Problem‐based learning: rationale and description , 1983, Medical education.

[25]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[26]  C. Candace Chou,et al.  A comparative content analysis of student interaction in synchronous and asynchronous learning networks , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[27]  Joanne M. McInnerney,et al.  Online Learning: Social Interaction and the Creation of a Sense of Community , 2004, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[28]  Karen R. Harris,et al.  Application to learning and teaching , 2012 .

[29]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[30]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[31]  Sanna Järvelä,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning , 2008 .

[32]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL , 2007 .

[33]  Jürgen Wegge,et al.  Communication via Videoconference: Emotional and Cognitive Consequences of Affective Personality Dispositions, Seeing One's Own Picture, and Disturbing Events , 2006, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Steve Graham,et al.  APA Educational Psychology Handbook. , 2011 .

[35]  Genevieve Marie Johnson,et al.  Synchronous and Asynchronous Text-Based CMC in Educational Contexts: A Review of Recent Research , 2006 .

[36]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  The role of academic motivation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  Effectiveness of a voluntary postsecondary remediation program in mathematics , 2012 .

[38]  Hanna Järvenoja,et al.  Research on Motivation in Collaborative Learning: Moving Beyond the Cognitive–Situative Divide and Combining Individual and Social Processes , 2010 .

[39]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Lin Muilenburg,et al.  How Do Students Participate in Synchronous and Asynchronous Online Discussions? , 2001 .

[41]  F. Dochy,et al.  Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations , 2010 .

[42]  Shane Dawson,et al.  A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community , 2006, Internet High. Educ..

[43]  Rob Koper,et al.  From pattern to practice: Evaluation of a design pattern fostering trust in virtual teams , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Helge I. Strømsø,et al.  Content and processes in problem-based learning: a comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..