Sequential vs. concurrent chemoradiation for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: randomized phase III trial RTOG 9410.

BACKGROUND The combination of chemotherapy with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) compared with TRT alone has been shown to confer a survival advantage for good performance status patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. However, it is not known whether sequential or concurrent delivery of these therapies is the optimal combination strategy. METHODS A total of 610 patients were randomly assigned to two concurrent regimens and one sequential chemotherapy and TRT regimen in a three-arm phase III trial. The sequential arm included cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29 and vinblastine at 5 mg/m2 per week for 5 weeks with 63 Gy TRT delivered as once-daily fractions beginning on day 50. Arm 2 used the same chemotherapy regimen as arm 1 with 63 Gy TRT delivered as once-daily fractions beginning on day 1 [corrected]. Arm 3 used cisplatin at 50 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29, and 36 with oral etoposide at 50 mg twice daily for 10 weeks on days 1, 2, 5, and 6 with 69.6 Gy delivered as 1.2 Gy twice-daily fractions beginning on day 1. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints included tumor response and time to tumor progression. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess survival, and toxic effects were examined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Median survival times were 14.6, 17.0, and 15.6 months for arms 1-3, respectively. Five-year survival was statistically significantly higher for patients treated with the concurrent regimen with once-daily TRT compared with the sequential treatment (5-year survival: sequential, arm 1, 10% [20 patients], 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7% to 15%; concurrent, arm 2, 16% [31 patients], 95% CI = 11% to 22%, P = .046; concurrent, arm 3, 13% [22 patients], 95% CI = 9% to 18%). With a median follow-up time of 11 years, the rates of acute grade 3-5 nonhematologic toxic effects were higher with concurrent than sequential therapy, but late toxic effects were similar. CONCLUSION Concurrent delivery of cisplatin-based chemotherapy with TRT confers a long-term survival benefit compared with the sequential delivery of these therapies.

[1]  C. Perez,et al.  Impact of irradiation technique and tumor extent in tumor control and survival of patients with unresectable non‐oat cell carcinoma of the lung. Report by the radiation therapy oncology group , 1982, Cancer.

[2]  K. Oysul,et al.  Split-course radiotherapy with or without concurrent or sequential chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. , 2000, Radiation medicine.

[3]  D. Ettinger,et al.  Concurrent hyperfractionated irradiation and chemotherapy for unresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer. Results of radiation therapy oncology group 90‐15 , 1995, Cancer.

[4]  R W Makuch,et al.  Sample size requirements for comparing time-to-failure among k treatment groups. , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.

[5]  Walter J Curran,et al.  Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M Zelen,et al.  The randomization and stratification of patients to clinical trials. , 1974, Journal of chronic diseases.

[7]  Jeffrey Bradley,et al.  Toxicity and outcome results of RTOG 9311: a phase I-II dose-escalation study using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung carcinoma. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  B. Jeremic,et al.  Hyperfractionated radiation therapy with or without concurrent low-dose daily carboplatin/etoposide for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. Daurès,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of sequential chemoradiotherapy compared with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Groupe Lyon-Saint-Etienne d'Oncologie Thoracique-Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie NPC 95-01 Study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  K. Propert,et al.  A randomized trial of induction chemotherapy plus high-dose radiation versus radiation alone in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. Arriagada,et al.  Radiotherapy alone versus combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nonresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: first analysis of a randomized trial in 353 patients. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[12]  W. Curran,et al.  Concurrent chemoradiation therapy with oral etoposide and cisplatin for locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: radiation therapy oncology group protocol 91-06. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  T R Fleming,et al.  Designs for group sequential tests. , 1984, Controlled clinical trials.

[14]  R. Simon,et al.  Two multi-step selection procedures with Possible selection of two treatments of equal prior preference , 1994 .

[15]  J. Herndon,et al.  Randomized phase II study of cisplatin with gemcitabine or paclitaxel or vinorelbine as induction chemotherapy followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy for stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: cancer and leukemia group B study 9431. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  H. Bartelink,et al.  Effects of concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy on inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Kudoh,et al.  Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Randomised trial of sequential versus concurrent chemo-radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (EORTC 08972-22973). , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[19]  Ladislav Pecen,et al.  Concurrent versus sequential chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized study. , 2004, Lung cancer.

[20]  W. Curran,et al.  Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 88-08 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 4588: preliminary results of a phase III trial in regionally advanced, unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.