Morphology, Velocity, and Intermittent Flight in Birds1

Abstract Body size, pectoralis composition, aspect ratio of the wing, and forward speed affect the use of intermittent flight in birds. During intermittent non-flapping phases, birds extend their wings and glide or flex their wings and bound. The pectoralis muscle is active during glides but not during bounds; activity in other primary flight muscles is variable. Mechanical power, altitude, and velocity vary among wingbeats in flapping phases; associated with this variation are changes in neuromuscular recruitment, wingbeat frequency, amplitude, and gait. Species of intermediate body mass (35–158 g) tend to flap-glide at slower speeds and flap-bound at faster speeds, regardless of the aspect ratio of their wings. Such behavior may reduce mechanical power output relative to continuous flapping. Smaller species (<20 g) with wings of low aspect ratio may flap-bound at all speeds, yet existing models do not predict an aerodynamic advantage for the flight style at slow speeds. The behavior of these species appears to be due to wing shape rather than pectoralis physiology. As body size increases among species, percent time spent flapping increases, and birds much larger than 300 g do not flap-bound. This pattern may be explained by adverse scaling of mass-specific power or lift per unit power output available from flight muscles. The size limit for the ability to bound intermittently may be offset somewhat by the scaling of pectoralis composition. The percentage of time spent flapping during intermittent flight also varies according to flight speed.

[1]  Jeremy M. V. Rayner,et al.  Bounding and undulating flight in birds , 1985 .

[2]  K. Dial,et al.  AVIAN FORELIMB MUSCLES AND NONSTEADY FLIGHT: CAN BIRDS FLY WITHOUT USING THE MUSCLES IN THEIR WINGS? , 1992 .

[3]  Speciation in Sapsuckers (Sphyrapicus). III. Mitochondrial-DNA sequence divergence at the cytochrome-B locus , 1995 .

[4]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .

[5]  Tobalske,et al.  Flight kinematics of black-billed magpies and pigeons over a wide range of speeds , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  J. Rayner Estimating power curves of flying vertebrates. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  D. Warrick,et al.  The turning- and linear-maneuvering performance of birds : the cost of efficiency for coursing insectivores , 1998 .

[8]  J. Marden From damselflies to pterosaurs: how burst and sustainable flight performance scale with size. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[9]  A. Hill Dimensions of Animals and their Muscular Dynamics , 1949, Nature.

[10]  L. L. Short,et al.  Woodpeckers of the world , 1982 .

[11]  R. A. Meyers,et al.  Gliding flight in the American Kestrel (Falco sparverius): An electromyographic study , 1993, Journal of morphology.

[12]  A. Aulie Electrical activity from the pectoral muscle of a flying bird, the budgerigar☆ , 1970 .

[13]  E. Bandman,et al.  Heterogeneity of myosin heavy-chain expression in fast-twitch fiber types of mature avian pectoralis muscle. , 1996, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[14]  T T Gleeson,et al.  The effects of intensity on the energetics of brief locomotor activity. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  T. Garland,et al.  Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .

[16]  Anders Hedenström,et al.  THE OPTIMUM FLIGHT SPEEDS OF FLYING ANIMALS , 1998 .

[17]  C. J. Pennycuick,et al.  Chapter 1 – MECHANICS OF FLIGHT , 1975 .

[18]  W. Moore,et al.  Chapter 4 - The Window of Taxonomic Resolution for Phylogenies Based on Mitochondrial Cytochrome b , 1997 .

[19]  K P Dial,et al.  Flight style of the black-billed magpie: variation in wing kinematics, neuromuscular control, and muscle composition. , 1997, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[20]  Tobalske,et al.  NEUROMUSCULAR CONTROL AND KINEMATICS OF INTERMITTENT FLIGHT IN BUDGERIGARS (MELOPSITTACUS UNDULATUS) , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[21]  A. Biewener,et al.  In vivo pectoralis muscle force-length behavior during level flight in pigeons (Columba livia) , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[22]  John E. R. Staddon,et al.  Optima for animals , 1982 .

[23]  A. J. Ward-Smith,et al.  Analysis of the aerodynamic performance of birds during bounding flight , 1984 .

[24]  A. Biewener,et al.  Mechanical power output of bird flight , 1997, Nature.

[25]  A. J. Ward-Smith Aerodynamic and energetic considerations relating to undulating and bounding flight in birds , 1984 .

[26]  J. Ahlquist,et al.  The Birds Reclassified. (Book Reviews: Phylogeny and Classification of Birds. A Study in Molecular Evolution.) , 1991 .

[27]  M. J. Lishthill Introduction to the Scaling of Aerial Locomotion , 1977 .

[28]  BryantDM NuddsRL The energetic cost of short flights in birds. , 2000 .

[29]  Tobalske Neuromuscular control and kinematics of intermittent flight in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  P. Withers An Aerodynamic Analysis of Bird Wings as Fixed Aerofoils , 1981 .

[31]  Bret W. Tobalske,et al.  SCALING OF MUSCLE COMPOSITION, WING MORPHOLOGY, AND INTERMITTENT FLIGHT BEHAVIOR IN WOODPECKERS , 1996 .

[32]  K. Schmidt-Nielsen,et al.  Energy cost of gliding flight in herring gulls , 1974, Nature.

[33]  Benjamin W. C. Rosser,et al.  The avian pectoralis : histochemical characterization and distribution of muscle fiber types , 1986 .

[34]  G. E. Goslow,et al.  Wing upstroke and the evolution of flapping flight , 1997, Nature.

[35]  Tobalske,et al.  Kinematics of flap-bounding flight in the zebra finch over a wide range of speeds , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[36]  G. Loeb,et al.  Electromyography for Experimentalists , 1986 .