A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robots

If we are to one day rely on robots as assistive devices they should be capable of mitigating the impact of random disturbances and avoid falling. Humans are surprisingly apt at remaining on their feet when pushed; they rely on reflexes such as bending the ankles and/or the hips, or by taking a step if the magnitude of the disturbance is relatively large. This paper presents a fall avoidance scheme that is capable of applying both ankle and hip strategies on a humanoid robot. While both strategies serve the same purpose, the hip strategy can absorb larger disturbances but has a higher energy overhead and should be avoided when it is not necessary. Our system is capable of detecting at the onset of a disturbance if an ankle or hip strategy is more appropriate. The decision is taken based on a “decision surface” that is delimited by threshold values of the robot's state variables. The control is based on the intuitive Virtual Model Control (VMC) approach. The system is tested on a simulated robot developed under Gazebo. Results show successful fall avoidance with an ability to choose the optimum fall avoidance strategy

[1]  David A. Winter,et al.  Human balance and posture control during standing and walking , 1995 .

[2]  Ambarish Goswami,et al.  Postural Stability of Biped Robots and the Foot-Rotation Indicator (FRI) Point , 1999, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Jerry E. Pratt,et al.  Exploiting inherent robustness and natural dynamics in the control of bipedal walking robots , 2000 .

[4]  Chee-Meng Chew,et al.  Virtual Model Control: An Intuitive Approach for Bipedal Locomotion , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  Miomir Vukobratovic,et al.  Zero-Moment Point - Thirty Five Years of its Life , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[6]  Andrew Howard,et al.  Design and use paradigms for Gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[7]  Ambarish Goswami,et al.  A Biomechanically Motivated Two-Phase Strategy for Biped Upright Balance Control , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Taku Komura,et al.  A Feedback Controller for Biped Humanoids that Can Counteract Large Perturbations During Gait , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Sergey V. Drakunov,et al.  Capture Point: A Step toward Humanoid Push Recovery , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[10]  Benjamin J. Stephens,et al.  Humanoid push recovery , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[11]  Jerry E. Pratt,et al.  Learning Capture Points for humanoid push recovery , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[12]  Daniel C. Asmar,et al.  A Simple Momentum Controller for Humanoid Push Recovery , 2009, FIRA RoboWorld Congress.