Evaluation of bus bridging scenarios for railway service disruption management: a users’ delay modelling tool

Unexpected transit service disruptions degrade the quality of service provided to the public. Bus bridging is considered a key response strategy used to handle metro service interruptions, where buses are retracted from scheduled services and deployed to offer shuttle services along disrupted segments. Most transit agencies rely on ad-hoc approaches (based on experience) to determine which buses should be dispatched from the scheduled services, with little (or no) consideration of the impacts on users’ delays. This paper presents a practical tool to estimate the total users’ delay associated with a user-specified bus bridging plan. The tool is based on deterministic queueing theory. The total delay is composed of two components; direct delays of affected metro passengers along the disrupted segment and indirect delays of bus riders on the routes from which shuttle buses are dispatched. The tool utilizes several input data, including travel times, train load information, boarding and alighting passenger counts, bus frequencies, and routes’ cycle times. It provides transit practitioners and operational managers with a valuable instrument for evaluating different bus bridging scenarios. A case study of the transit network in Toronto is used to illustrate the tool’s functionality.

[1]  Amedeo R. Odoni,et al.  Optimizing Bus Bridging Services in Response to Disruptions of Urban Transit Rail Networks , 2016, Transp. Sci..

[2]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  Subway Service Down Again? Assessing the Effects of Subway Service Interruptions on Local Surface Transit Performance , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[3]  Jan-Dirk Schmöcker,et al.  Metro service delay recovery : Comparison of strategies and constraints across systems , 2005 .

[4]  J. Bates,et al.  The valuation of reliability for personal travel , 2001 .

[5]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  Managing Unplanned Rail Disruptions: Policy Implications and Guidelines Towards an Effective Bus Bridging Strategy , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[6]  M. Bierlaire,et al.  ESTIMATION OF VALUE OF TRAVEL-TIME SAVINGS USING MIXED LOGIT MODELS , 2005 .

[7]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  Enabling large-scale transit microsimulation for disruption response support using the Nexus platform , 2017, Public Transp..

[8]  Alaa Itani Bus Bridging Decision-Support Toolkit: Optimization Framework and Policy Analysis , 2019 .

[9]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Bus Transit Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies: Integrating the Perspectives of Passengers and Transit Agencies in North America , 2015 .

[10]  Matthew G. Karlaftis,et al.  The bus bridging problem in metro operations: conceptual framework, models and algorithms , 2009, Public Transp..

[11]  Oded Cats,et al.  Measuring spill-over effects of disruptions in public transport networks , 2017, 2017 5th IEEE International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS).

[12]  R. Noland,et al.  Travel time variability: A review of theoretical and empirical issues , 2002 .

[13]  Erik Jenelius,et al.  Planning for the unexpected: The value of reserve capacity for public transport network robustness , 2015 .

[14]  Doohee Nam,et al.  Estimation of Value of Travel Time Reliability , 2005 .

[15]  Oded Cats,et al.  The Robustness Value of Public Transport Development Plans , 2016 .

[16]  Wei Dong,et al.  Bus Bridging Disruption in Rail Services With Frustrated and Impatient Passengers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[17]  Amer Shalaby,et al.  Breaking into emergency shuttle service: Aspects and impacts of retracting buses from existing scheduled bus services , 2017 .