Undergraduate student attitudes and perceptions toward low- and high-level inquiry exercise physiology teaching laboratory experiences.

The purpose of this investigation was to compare student attitudes toward two different science laboratory learning experiences, specifically, traditional, cookbook-style, low-inquiry level (LL) activities and a high-inquiry level (HL) investigative project. In addition, we sought to measure and compare students' science-related attitudes and attitudes toward science. Students participated in 5 wk of LL activities followed by a 5-wk HL project. An open-ended survey administered at the end of the semester and analyzed by a χ(2)-test revealed that 1) students enjoyed the HL project more than the LL activities, 2) high-level inquiry did not have a negative effect on student motivation in the laboratory, and 3) students perceived that they learned more about physiology principles with the LL activities. Most students liked the HL project, particularly the independence, responsibility, freedom, and personal relevance. Of the students who did not like the HL project, many reported being uncomfortable with the lack of structure and guidance. Many students gained a more positive and realistic view about scientific research, often reporting an increased respect for science. Likert scale surveys administered before and after each 5-wk period showed no significant changes in student attitudes to scientific inquiry, adoption of scientific attitudes, enjoyment of science lessons, or motivation toward science when the three time points were compared. The findings in this study have helped to provide suggestions for better implementation of HL projects in the future.

[1]  R. Mager.  Developing attitude toward learning / Robert F. Mager , 2007 .

[2]  M. J. Myers,et al.  Inquiry-based laboratory course improves students' ability to design experiments and interpret data. , 2003, Advances in physiology education.

[3]  C. Mason,et al.  An inquiry-based learning model for an exercise physiology laboratory course. , 2001, Advances in physiology education.

[4]  R. R. Wilke,et al.  The effect of active learning on student characteristics in a human physiology course for nonmajors. , 2003, Advances in physiology education.

[5]  S. B. Chaplin,et al.  Guided development of independent inquiry in an anatomy/physiology laboratory. , 2003, Advances in physiology education.

[6]  Stephen J. Farenga,et al.  Informal Science Experience, Attitudes, Future Interest in Science, and Gender of High-Ability Students: An Exploratory Study , 1999 .

[7]  D. Rivers,et al.  Using a course-long theme for inquiry-based laboratories in a comparative physiology course. , 2002, Advances in physiology education.

[8]  Li-Hsuan Yang.  Toward a Deeper Understanding of Student Interest or Lack of Interest in Science , 2010 .

[9]  Sarah D. Loznak,et al.  Infusion of collaborative inquiry throughout a biology curriculum increases student learning: a four-year study of "Teams and Streams". , 2004, Advances in physiology education.

[10]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[11]  Qualitative Comparison of Students' Constructions of Science. , 1993 .

[12]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Scientific Research for Undergraduate Students: A Review of the Literature. , 2010 .

[13]  T. Lord,et al.  Moving From Didactic to Inquiry-Based Instruction In A Science Laboratory , 2006 .

[14]  M. Herron,et al.  The Nature of Scientific Enquiry , 1971, The School Review.

[15]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[16]  Vickie M. Williamson,et al.  Surveying Students' Attitudes and Perceptions toward Guided-Inquiry and Open-Inquiry Laboratories , 2009 .

[17]  J F Harrison,et al.  Evaluating the impact of physical renovation, computerization, and use of an inquiry approach in an undergraduate, allied health human anatomy and physiology lab. , 2001, Advances in physiology education.

[18]  L. Tibell,et al.  Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment , 2003 .

[19]  T. Pappenfus,et al.  Teaching Research: A Curriculum Model That Works , 2009 .

[20]  P. Brok,et al.  Teacher-student interpersonal behaviour in secondary science classes in Turkey , 2007 .

[21]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Assessment of the Learning Environment of Inquiry-Type Laboratories in High School Chemistry , 2001 .

[22]  Joseph J. Schwab.  The Teaching of Science as Inquiry , 1958 .

[23]  M. Sundberg,et al.  Creating effective investigative laboratories for undergraduates , 1994 .

[24]  Ann M. L. Cavallo,et al.  Students' Science Perceptions and Enrollment Decisions in Differing Learning Cycle Classrooms. , 2001 .

[25]  A P Woodhull-McNeal.  Project labs in physiology. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[26]  Eric Brewe,et al.  Modeling instruction: Positive attitudinal shifts in introductory physics measured with CLASS , 2009 .

[27]  William F. McComas.  The Nature of the Laboratory Experience: A Guide for Describing, Classifying, and Enhancing Hands-On Activities. , 1997 .