Effects of stimulation duration on electrogustometric thresholds

The ability to detect low electrical currents presented to the lingual surface is widely used to assess taste function in humans. Despite this fact, the influence of stimulus duration on electrical taste thresholds is not well established. In this study, we evaluated the effects of current duration (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 s) on electrogustometric detection thresholds for two regions of the anterior tongue in 24 college students. Anodal stimulation was produced using a stainless steel 12.5-mm(2) electrode, and thresholds were determined using a single-staircase procedure. A non-monotonic function for the threshold values was observed for both tongue regions across the stimulus durations, with the 1.0-s duration stimulus resulting in a lower threshold value (i.e., higher sensitivity) than either the 0.5- or 1.5-s durations, which did not differ in magnitude from one another. These data suggest that stimulus-duration-related enhancement of lingual detection threshold sensitivity to electric currents disappears at some point after 1 s.

[1]  M. Føns Electrogustometry. Spatial threshold variations. , 1970, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R. Doty,et al.  NaCl thresholds: relationship to anterior tongue locus, area of stimulation, and number of fungiform papillae , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[4]  R. Doty,et al.  Influence of stimulus duration on a regional measure of NaCl taste sensitivity. , 1997, Chemical senses.

[5]  P. Osterhammel,et al.  Electrogustometry II, part I: The spread of the stimulating current , 1969, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[6]  B. Krarup,et al.  Electro-gustometry: a method for clinical taste examinations. , 1958, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[7]  H. Meiselman,et al.  Clinical measurement of taste and smell , 1986 .

[8]  George H. Zimny Method in Experimental Psychology , 1961 .

[9]  R P Morton,et al.  Automated electrogustometry: a new paradigm for the estimation of taste detection thresholds. , 2000, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[10]  M. Ikeda,et al.  Clinical Use of Electrogustometry: Strengths and Limitations , 2002, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[11]  J. Hannibal,et al.  Electrical taste detection thresholds and chemical smell detection thresholds in patients with cancer , 1991, Cancer.

[12]  R. Doty,et al.  Electrogustometric thresholds Relationship to anterior tongue locus, area of stimulation, and number of fungiform papillae , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[13]  M. Zigler,et al.  Pressure Adaptation-Time: A Function of Intensity and Extensity , 1932 .

[14]  Y. Ninomiya,et al.  Ion specificity of rat chorda tympani fibers to chemical and electrical tongue stimulations , 1987, Brain Research.

[15]  Y. Ninomiya,et al.  Role of ions in generation of taste nerve responses to electrical tongue stimulation in rats. , 1981, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[16]  H. Tomita,et al.  Electrogustometry in facial palsy. , 1972, Archives of otolaryngology.

[17]  R. Ritter,et al.  Release of endogenous cholecystokinin in response to gastric preloads in rats on postnatal days 9–12 , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[18]  W. Gibson,et al.  Significance of taste and electrogustometry in assessing the prognosis of Bell's (idiopathic) facial palsy , 1974, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[19]  Electro-gustometry. I. Intensity relations of electrical taste. , 1968, The Journal of laryngology and otology.