Gobal-local precedence in picture processing

SummaryPrevious investigations of the global precedence hypothesis (Navon, 1977) have utilized compound letter stimuli. In these stimuli there is no predictive relationship between the global and local levels. Pictorial stimuli, however, contain mutually predictable global and local levels. This study investigated the global precedence hypothesis with pictorial stimuli using a Stroop-like interference task similar to that used by Navon. Subjects were required to respond either to the global (e.g., beach or farm) or local (e.g., boat or tractor) level of a scene. The display size and consistency of the global and local levels were varied. Response latencies supported global precedence for small scenes (4°) but local precedence for large scenes (16°). The results are interpreted by a model in which the priority of processing is determined by a critical spatial frequency sampling bandwidth.

[1]  L M Ward,et al.  Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Jeff Miller.  Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[3]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  P. Goolkasian.  Retinal location and its effect on the processing of target and distractor information. , 1981 .

[5]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  J. Gibson.  Theories of Perception. , 1951 .

[7]  D. Navon,et al.  Does global precedence really depend on visual angle? , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  D. Elkind,et al.  STUDIES IN PERCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT: II. PART-WHOLE PERCEPTION. , 1964, Child development.

[9]  David Navon,et al.  The forest revisited: More on global precedence , 1981 .

[10]  L. F. Alwitt,et al.  Two neural mechanisms related to modes of selective attention. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Detecting target elements in multielement arrays: A confusability model , 1974 .

[12]  Maryanne Martin.  Local and global processing: The role of sparsity , 1979 .

[13]  J E Hoffman,et al.  Interaction between global and local levels of a form. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.