Methylation profiling of paediatric pilocytic astrocytoma reveals variants specifically associated with tumour location and predictive of recurrence

Childhood pilocytic astrocytomas (PA) are low‐grade tumours with an excellent prognosis. However, a minority, particularly those in surgically inaccessible locations, have poorer long‐term outcome. At present, it is unclear whether anatomical location in isolation, or in combination with underlying biological variation, determines clinical behaviour. Here, we have tested the utility of DNA methylation profiling to inform tumour biology and to predict behaviour in paediatric PA. Genome‐wide DNA methylation profiles were generated for 117 paediatric PAs. Using a combination of analyses, we identified DNA methylation variants specific to tumour location and predictive of behaviour. Receiver‐operating characteristic analysis was used to test the predictive utility of clinical and/or DNA methylation features to classify tumour behaviour at diagnosis. Unsupervised analysis distinguished three methylation clusters associated with tumour location (cortical, midline and infratentorial). Differential methylation of 5404 sites identified enrichment of genes involved in ‘embryonic nervous system development’. Specific hypermethylation of NEUROG1 and NR2E1 was identified as a feature of cortical tumours. A highly accurate method to classify tumours according to behaviour, which combined three clinical features (age, location and extent of resection) and methylation level at a single site, was identified. Our findings show location‐specific epigenetic profiles for PAs, potentially reflecting their cell type of origin. This may account for differences in clinical behaviour according to location independent of histopathology. We also defined an accurate method to predict tumour behaviour at diagnosis. This warrants further testing in similar patient cohorts.

[1]  Mark L. Greenberg,et al.  Clinical and treatment factors determining long‐term outcomes for adult survivors of childhood low‐grade glioma: A population‐based study , 2016, Cancer.

[2]  T. Golub,et al.  Expression profiles of 151 pediatric low-grade gliomas reveal molecular differences associated with location and histological subtype. , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[3]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Next-generation (epi)genetic drivers of childhood brain tumours and the outlook for targeted therapies. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Molecular Classification of Ependymal Tumors across All CNS Compartments, Histopathological Grades, and Age Groups. , 2015, Cancer cell.

[5]  Martin Sill,et al.  Integrated DNA methylation and copy-number profiling identify three clinically and biologically relevant groups of anaplastic glioma , 2014, Acta Neuropathologica.

[6]  D. Gutmann,et al.  The molecular and cell biology of pediatric low-grade gliomas , 2014, Oncogene.

[7]  R. Beroukhim,et al.  Long-Term Outcome of 4,040 Children Diagnosed With Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas: An Analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Database , 2014, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[8]  Volker Hovestadt,et al.  Differential expression and methylation of brain developmental genes define location-specific subsets of pilocytic astrocytoma , 2013, Acta Neuropathologica.

[9]  Heather L. Mulder,et al.  Whole-genome sequencing identifies genetic alterations in pediatric low-grade gliomas , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[10]  N. Wetjen,et al.  Prognostic Factors and Survival Patterns in Pediatric Low-grade Gliomas Over 4 Decades , 2013, Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology.

[11]  C. Horbinski To BRAF or Not to BRAF: Is That Even a Question Anymore? , 2013, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[12]  D. Gutmann,et al.  Pediatric glioma-associated KIAA1549:BRAF expression regulates neuroglial cell growth in a cell type-specific and mTOR-dependent manner. , 2012, Genes & development.

[13]  Nicholas F. Marko,et al.  The molecular biology of WHO grade I astrocytomas. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[14]  J. Myung,et al.  Analysis of the BRAFV600E Mutation in Central Nervous System Tumors , 2012 .

[15]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[16]  T. Pietsch,et al.  Long-term follow-up of the multicenter, multidisciplinary treatment study HIT-LGG-1996 for low-grade glioma in children and adolescents of the German Speaking Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology. , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[17]  D. Gutmann,et al.  Innate neural stem cell heterogeneity determines the patterning of glioma formation in children. , 2012, Cancer cell.

[18]  A. Oshlack,et al.  SWAN: Subset-quantile Within Array Normalization for Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 BeadChips , 2012, Genome Biology.

[19]  Chun-li Zhang,et al.  Activation of Postnatal Neural Stem Cells Requires Nuclear Receptor TLX , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  C. Johansen,et al.  A systematic review of studies on psychosocial late effects of childhood cancer: Structures of society and methodological pitfalls may challenge the conclusions , 2011, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[21]  John B Carlin,et al.  DNA methylation analysis of multiple tissues from newborn twins reveals both genetic and intrauterine components to variation in the human neonatal epigenome. , 2010, Human molecular genetics.

[22]  D. Nam,et al.  The neural stem cell fate determinant TLX promotes tumorigenesis and genesis of cells resembling glioma stem cells , 2010, Molecules and cells.

[23]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  The nuclear receptor tailless induces long-term neural stem cell expansion and brain tumor initiation. , 2010, Genes & development.

[24]  D. Gutmann,et al.  Microarray analyses reveal regional astrocyte heterogeneity with implications for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)‐regulated glial proliferation , 2009, Glia.

[25]  A. King,et al.  Long-term outcomes among adult survivors of childhood central nervous system malignancies in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[26]  D. Figarella-Branger,et al.  Pilocytic astrocytoma of the optic pathway: a tumour deriving from radial glia cells with a specific gene signature. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  BRAF gene duplication constitutes a mechanism of MAPK pathway activation in low-grade astrocytomas. , 2008, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[28]  R. Gilbertson,et al.  Tumorigenesis in the brain: location, location, location. , 2007, Cancer research.

[29]  Arie Perry,et al.  Distinct genetic signatures among pilocytic astrocytomas relate to their brain region origin. , 2007, Cancer research.

[30]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Genomic Analysis of Pilocytic Astrocytomas at 0.97 Mb Resolution Shows an Increasing Tendency Toward Chromosomal Copy Number Change With Age , 2006, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[31]  P. Kleihues,et al.  Population-based studies on incidence, survival rates, and genetic alterations in astrocytic and oligodendroglial gliomas. , 2005, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[32]  D. Figarella-Branger,et al.  Pilocytic Astrocytomas in Children: Prognostic Factors—A Retrospective Study of 80 Cases , 2003, Neurosurgery.

[33]  Y. Yonekawa,et al.  A population-based study of the incidence and survival rates in patients with pilocytic astrocytoma. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[34]  Peter A. Jones,et al.  The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[35]  S. Schultz Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed. , 2001 .

[36]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Neurogenin Promotes Neurogenesis and Inhibits Glial Differentiation by Independent Mechanisms , 2001, Cell.

[37]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Mash1 and neurogenin1 Expression Patterns Define Complementary Domains of Neuroepithelium in the Developing CNS and Are Correlated with Regions Expressing Notch Ligands , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Robert Walgate,et al.  Proliferation , 1985, Nature.

[39]  J. Hansford,et al.  Low rates of recurrence and slow progression of pediatric pilocytic astrocytoma after gross-total resection: justification for reducing surveillance imaging. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[40]  C. Giannini,et al.  Pilocytic astrocytoma: pathology, molecular mechanisms and markers. , 2015, Acta neuropathologica.

[41]  Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan,et al.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012 , 2015, Neuro-oncology.

[42]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .