Ab-Ligity: identifying sequence-dissimilar antibodies that bind to the same epitope

Solving the structure of an antibody-antigen complex gives atomic level information of the interactions between an antibody and its antigen, but such structures are expensive and hard to obtain. Alternative experimental sources include epitope mapping and binning experiments which can be used as a surrogate to identify key interacting residues. However, their resolution is usually not sufficient to identify if two antibodies have identical interactions. Computational approaches to this problem have so far been based on the premise that antibodies with similar sequences behave similarly. Such approaches will fail to identify sequence-distant antibodies that target the same epitope. We present Ab-Ligity, a structure-based similarity measure tailored to antibody-antigen interfaces. Using predicted paratopes on model antibody structures, we assessed its ability to identify those antibodies that target highly similar epitopes. Most antibodies adopting similar binding modes can be identified from sequence similarity alone, using methods such as clonotyping. In the challenging subset of antibodies whose sequences differ significantly, Ab-Ligity is still able to predict antibodies that would bind to highly similar epitopes (precision of 0.95 and recall of 0.69). We compared Ab-Ligity’s performance to an existing tool for comparing general protein interfaces, InterComp, and showed improved performance on antibody cases alongside a significant speed-up. These results suggest that Ab-Ligity will allow the identification of diverse (sequence-dissimilar) antibodies that bind to the same epitopes from large datasets such as immune repertoires. The tool is available at http://opig.stats.ox.ac.uk/resources.

[1]  M. Bronstein,et al.  Deciphering interaction fingerprints from protein molecular surfaces using geometric deep learning , 2019, Nature Methods.

[2]  J. Juraszek,et al.  Epitope mapping of diverse influenza Hemagglutinin drug candidates using HDX-MS , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[3]  J. Kirsch,et al.  How do two unrelated antibodies, HyHEL‐10 and F9.13.7, recognize the same epitope of hen egg‐white lysozyme? , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[4]  Johannes Trück,et al.  In-Depth Assessment of Within-Individual and Inter-Individual Variation in the B Cell Receptor Repertoire , 2015, Front. Immunol..

[5]  Garrett M Morris,et al.  Ligity: A Non-Superpositional, Knowledge-Based Approach to Virtual Screening , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[6]  N. Sinha,et al.  Modeling the binding sites of anti-hen egg white lysozyme antibodies HyHEL-8 and HyHEL-26: an insight into the molecular basis of antibody cross-reactivity and specificity. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Jiye Shi,et al.  SAbDab: the structural antibody database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Pietro Liò,et al.  Parapred: antibody paratope prediction using convolutional and recurrent neural networks , 2018, Bioinform..

[9]  C. Deane,et al.  Antibody–antigen complex modelling in the era of immunoglobulin repertoire sequencing , 2019, Molecular Systems Design & Engineering.

[10]  Ron Diskin,et al.  Sequence and Structural Convergence of Broad and Potent HIV Antibodies That Mimic CD4 Binding , 2011, Science.

[11]  M. Damschroder,et al.  Current approaches to fine mapping of antigen–antibody interactions , 2014, Immunology.

[12]  Sameer Velankar,et al.  Modeling protein‐protein, protein‐peptide, and protein‐oligosaccharide complexes: CAPRI 7th edition , 2019, Proteins.

[13]  W. Olson,et al.  Epitope Mapping by HDX-MS Elucidates the Surface Coverage of Antigens Associated with High Blocking Efficiency of Antibodies to Birch Pollen Allergen. , 2018, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Bartek Wilczynski,et al.  Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics , 2009, Bioinform..

[15]  Tina Ritschel,et al.  Pharmacophore Fingerprint-Based Approach to Binding Site Subpocket Similarity and Its Application to Bioisostere Replacement , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[16]  Jiye Shi,et al.  Five computational developability guidelines for therapeutic antibody profiling , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. Mascola,et al.  HIV-1 Neutralizing Antibodies Display Dual Recognition of the Primary and Coreceptor Binding Sites and Preferential Binding to Fully Cleaved Envelope Glycoproteins , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[18]  Cédric R. Weber,et al.  Deep learning enables therapeutic antibody optimization in mammalian cells by deciphering high-dimensional protein sequence space , 2019, bioRxiv.

[19]  Patrice Duroux,et al.  IMGT®, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system® 25 years on , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  C. Deane,et al.  Evidence of Antibody Repertoire Functional Convergence through Public Baseline and Shared Response Structures , 2020, bioRxiv.

[21]  Bojana Popovic,et al.  Experimentally guided computational antibody affinity maturation with de novo docking, modelling and rational design , 2019, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  Johannes Trück,et al.  Identification of Antigen-Specific B Cell Receptor Sequences Using Public Repertoire Analysis , 2015, The Journal of Immunology.

[23]  James E. Crowe,et al.  High frequency of shared clonotypes in human B cell receptor repertoires , 2019, Nature.

[24]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Local and global anatomy of antibody‐protein antigen recognition , 2018, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[25]  Leonard D. Goldstein,et al.  Restricted epitope specificity determined by variable region germline segment pairing in rodent antibody repertoires , 2020, mAbs.

[26]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Protein-Protein Interfaces: Recognition of Similar Spatial and Chemical Organizations , 2004, WABI.

[27]  Charlotte M. Deane,et al.  ANARCI: antigen receptor numbering and receptor classification , 2015, Bioinform..

[28]  Björn Wallner,et al.  Topology independent structural matching discovers novel templates for protein interfaces , 2017, bioRxiv.

[29]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  SiteEngines: recognition and comparison of binding sites and protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  C. Deane,et al.  Observed Antibody Space: A Resource for Data Mining Next-Generation Sequencing of Antibody Repertoires , 2018, The Journal of Immunology.

[31]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  A new clustering of antibody CDR loop conformations. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Adam Miles,et al.  Antibodies Targeting Closely Adjacent or Minimally Overlapping Epitopes Can Displace One Another , 2017, PloS one.

[33]  Jiye Shi,et al.  ABodyBuilder: Automated antibody structure prediction with data–driven accuracy estimation , 2016, mAbs.