Prosodic effects on factive presupposition projection

This paper reports a follow-up to Tonhauser (2016) investigating the interaction between prosodically-mediated pragmatics and factive presupposition projection. We replicate Tonhauser’s finding that prosody does have an impact on factive presupposition projection (stress on material in the embedded clause decrease the strength of projection). However, we found that this difference was substantially smaller than the difference between factive and non-factive predicates. We also found that stress placement impacted projection judgments for non-factive clauses as well. We outline a hypothesis for a general pragmatic mechanism for deriving non-assertive inferences from prosody and discuss how that mechanism interacts with the projection of factive presuppositions.

[1]  K. Hornik,et al.  Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework , 2006 .

[3]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Be Articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection , 2008 .

[4]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar , 1995 .

[5]  David I. Beaver,et al.  What projects and why , 2010 .

[6]  K. Fintel.  Would You Believe It? The King of France is Back! (Presuppositions and Truth-Value Intuitions) , 2001 .

[7]  Pranav Anand,et al.  Factivity, Belief and Discourse ⇤ , 2014 .

[8]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Partykit: a modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R , 2015, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  H. Kamp.  A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation , 2008 .

[10]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic Montague grammar , 1990 .

[11]  Rob A. van der Sandt,et al.  Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution , 1992, J. Semant..

[12]  J. Hooper.  On Assertive Predicates , 1975 .

[13]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Accommodation, Meaning, and Implicature: Interdisciplinary Foundations for Pragmatics , 2003 .

[14]  Tomek Strzalkowski,et al.  From Discourse to Logic , 1991 .

[15]  Dorit Abusch,et al.  Presupposition Triggering from Alternatives , 2010, J. Semant..

[16]  Judith Tonhauser,et al.  Prosodic cues to presupposition projection , 2016 .

[17]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form , 1978 .

[18]  Mandy Simons,et al.  On the Conversational Basis of Some Presuppositions , 2013 .

[19]  Craige Roberts.  Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated for-mal theory of pragmatics , 1996 .

[20]  Márta Abrusán,et al.  Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers , 2011 .

[21]  Márta Abrusán,et al.  Presupposition cancellation: explaining the ‘soft–hard’ trigger distinction , 2016 .

[22]  David I. Beaver,et al.  The Best Question: Explaining the Projection Behavior of Factives , 2017 .

[23]  R. Folli,et al.  Scalar implicatures vs. Presuppositions: the view from Broca’s aphasia , 2015 .

[24]  Jacopo Romoli,et al.  The Presuppositions of Soft Triggers are Obligatory Scalar Implicatures , 2015, J. Semant..

[25]  LAURI KARTTUNEN,et al.  PRESUPPOSITION AND LINGUISTIC CONTEXT , 1974 .

[26]  Chris Cummins,et al.  Evoking Context with Contrastive Stress: Effects on Pragmatic Enrichment , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[27]  Mandy Simons,et al.  Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition , 2007 .

[28]  Irene Heim,et al.  Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs , 1992, J. Semant..

[29]  J. Gabry,et al.  Bayesian Applied Regression Modeling via Stan , 2016 .

[30]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Review Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference , 2022 .

[31]  Florian Schwarz,et al.  Experimental Work in Presupposition and Presupposition Projection , 2016 .

[32]  H. Savin,et al.  The projection problem for presuppositions , 1971 .

[33]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Some observations on factivity , 1971 .

[34]  Dorit Abusch,et al.  Lexical Alternatives as a Source of Pragmatic Presuppositions , 2002 .

[35]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Scalar Implicatures Versus Presuppositions: The View from Acquisition , 2016 .