Segmenting Visual Narratives: Evidence for Constituent Structure in Comics

We have proposed that visual narratives in comics are organized with a hierarchic narrative “grammar.” Inspired by classic “click” studies of syntax, we inserted blank “disruption” panels Before, At, or After the constituent boundaries of comic strips. In self-paced viewing, Experiment 1 found that blanks After the boundary were viewed slower than Before or At the boundary. Panels immediately following blanks were slower than corresponding panels in sequences without blank panels, but only when placed Before or After the boundary. Three ordinal panel positions following the boundary, panels following blanks At the boundary or with No-Blanks were viewed faster than panels following blanks After or Before the boundary. This supports constituency because disruptions had greater impact within, as opposed to between, constituents. Using ERPs, Experiment 2 found a larger anterior negativity to blanks within constituents (Before/After) than between constituents (At). This indicates disruptions of constituents are recognized before reaching a subsequent panel. A larger P600 appeared to blanks After the boundary than in the first constituent (Before/At). This positivity may reflect a reanalysis reflecting the inability to integrate all prior panels into a single constituent, since they are divided by the constituent boundary.

[1]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[2]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Priming in an Object Decision Task , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[3]  Stefan Koelsch,et al.  Interaction between Syntax Processing in Language and in Music: An ERP Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  P. Thorndyke Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  A. D. Manning,et al.  Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art , 1993 .

[7]  J. Fodor,et al.  The psychological reality of linguistic segments , 1965 .

[8]  Neil Cohn Early writings on visual language , 2003 .

[9]  山田 雄一郎,et al.  On Psychological Reality , 1984 .

[10]  Neil Cohn,et al.  Visual Narrative Structure , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  Aniruddh D. Patel,et al.  Processing Syntactic Relations in Language and Music: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  N. S. Johnson,et al.  Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Human Comprehension , 2008 .

[15]  Neil Cohn,et al.  (Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: Structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[18]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Empirical Evidence for Narrative Structure , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Jean M. Mandler,et al.  On the psychological reality of story structure , 1987 .

[20]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A scaling approach to the study of syntactic relations , 1970 .

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[22]  D. Rumelhart NOTES ON A SCHEMA FOR STORIES , 1975 .

[23]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Surface information loss in comprehension , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.