Left–right differences in the proximal femur’s strength of post-menopausal women: a multicentric finite element study

SummaryThe strength of both femurs was estimated in 198 post-menopausal women through subject-specific finite element models. Important random differences between contralateral femurs were found in a significant number of subjects, pointing to the usefulness of further studies to understand if strength-based classification of patients at risk of fracture can be affected by laterality issues.IntroductionSignificant, although small, differences exist in mineral density and anatomy of contralateral proximal femurs. These differences, and their combined effect, may result in a side difference in femurs’ strength. However, this has never been tested on a large sample of a homogenous population.MethodsThe strength of both femurs was estimated in 198 post-menopausal women through CT-derived finite element models, built using a validated procedure, in sideways fall conditions. The impact of the resulting asymmetry on the classification of subjects at risk of fracture was analysed.ResultsThe small difference observed between sides (the right femur on average 4 % stronger than the left) was statistically significant but mechanically negligible. In contrast, higher random differences (absolute difference between sides with respect to mean value) were found: on average close to 15 % (compared to 9.2 % for areal bone mineral density (aBMD) alone), with high scatter among the subjects. When using a threshold-based classification, the right and left femurs were discordant up to over 20 % of cases (K always lower than 0.60) but the left femur was concordant (mean K = 0.84) with the minimum strength between right and left.ConclusionConsidering both femurs may be important when trying to classify subjects at risk of failure with strength estimates. Future studies including fracture assessment would be necessary to quantify the real impact.

[1]  Mary L Bouxsein,et al.  Determinants of skeletal fragility. , 2005, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[2]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women. , 2014, Bone.

[3]  H. Genant,et al.  Cross-calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: Corrections to the UCSF normative data , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[4]  C. Cann,et al.  Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[5]  M. Viceconti,et al.  A modified method for assigning material properties to FE models of bones. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  C. Heiss,et al.  Right and left proximal femur analyses: Is there a need to do both? , 1996, Calcified Tissue International.

[7]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Reproducibility and Side Differences of Mechanical Tests for Determining the Structural Strength of the Proximal Femur , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  Andrew H. Gee,et al.  Independent measurement of femoral cortical thickness and cortical bone density using clinical CT , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  J. Cauley,et al.  Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis. , 2005, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[10]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  Normand Robert,et al.  Generalized method for computation of true thickness and x-ray intensity information in highly blurred sub-millimeter bone features in clinical CT images , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  B. Snyder,et al.  Assessment of the bilateral asymmetry of human femurs based on physical, densitometric, and structural rigidity characteristics. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  N. Watts,et al.  The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[17]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Are Subject-Specific Musculoskeletal Models Robust to the Uncertainties in Parameter Identification? , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  K. Tsai,et al.  Symmetry of Bone Mineral Density at the Proximal Femur with Emphasis on the Effect of Side Dominance , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[19]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An improved method for the automatic mapping of computed tomography numbers onto finite element models. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  W. Kalender,et al.  The European Spine Phantom--a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[21]  Nancy Lane,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur and Hip Fracture Risk in Older Men , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  C. Cooper,et al.  An Investigation of the Diagnostic Value of Bilateral Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density Measurements , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Accuracy of finite element predictions in sideways load configurations for the proximal human femur. , 2012, Journal of Biomechanics.

[24]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Interim Report and Recommendations of the World Health Organization Task-Force for Osteoporosis , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[25]  T. Harris,et al.  Age-related loss of proximal femoral strength in elderly men and women: the Age Gene/Environment Susceptibility Study--Reykjavik. , 2012, Bone.

[26]  V. Gudnason,et al.  Male-female differences in the association between incident hip fracture and proximal femoral strength: a finite element analysis study. , 2011, Bone.

[27]  V. Gudnason,et al.  Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study: multidisciplinary applied phenomics. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[28]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  T. Therneau,et al.  Association of hip strength estimates by finite‐element analysis with fractures in women and men , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[30]  D. Cooperman,et al.  Are the Left and Right Proximal Femurs Symmetric? , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  Benjamin M. Auerbach,et al.  Limb bone bilateral asymmetry: variability and commonality among modern humans. , 2006, Journal of human evolution.

[32]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  F. Taddei,et al.  To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations? , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Andrew H. Gee,et al.  Cortical Thickness Mapping to Identify Focal Osteoporosis in Patients with Hip Fracture , 2012, PloS one.

[35]  V. Gudnason,et al.  Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans , 2014, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[36]  W. C. Hayes,et al.  Impact direction from a fall influences the failure load of the proximal femur as much as age-related bone loss , 1996, Calcified Tissue International.