The importance of good practices and false hits for QSAR-driven virtual screening real application: a SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) case study

Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD) approaches, such as those employing quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods, are known for their ability to uncover novel data from large databases. These approaches can help alleviate the lack of biological and chemical data, but some predictions do not generate sufficient positive information to be useful for biological screenings. QSAR models are often employed to explain biological data of chemicals and to design new chemicals based on their predictions. In this review, we discuss the importance of data set size with a focus on false hits for QSAR approaches. We assess the challenges and reliability of an initial in silico strategy for the virtual screening of bioactive molecules. Lastly, we present a case study reporting a combination approach of hologram-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (HQSAR) models and random forest-based QSAR (RF-QSAR), based on the 3D structures of 25 synthetic SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors, to virtually screen new compounds for potential inhibitors of enzyme activity. In this study, optimal models were selected and employed to predict Mpro inhibitors from the database Brazilian Compound Library (BraCoLi). Twenty-four compounds were then assessed against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro at 10 µM. At the time of this study (March 2021), the availability of varied and different Mpro inhibitors that were reported definitely affected the reliability of our work. Since no hits were obtained, the data set size, parameters employed, external validations, as well as the applicability domain (AD) could be considered regarding false hits data contribution, aiming to enhance the design and discovery of new bioactive molecules.

[1]  B. Weynand,et al.  Nirmatrelvir-resistant SARS-CoV-2 is efficiently transmitted in female Syrian hamsters and retains partial susceptibility to treatment , 2023, Nature communications.

[2]  V. Katritch,et al.  Computational approaches streamlining drug discovery , 2023, Nature.

[3]  Charles N. Lowe,et al.  Transparency in Modeling through Careful Application of OECD's QSAR/QSPR Principles via a Curated Water Solubility Data Set. , 2023, Chemical research in toxicology.

[4]  M. Khanfar,et al.  Discovery of natural‐derived Mpro inhibitors as therapeutic candidates for COVID‐19: Structure‐based pharmacophore screening combined with QSAR analysis , 2023, Molecular informatics.

[5]  Davide Pirolli,et al.  Virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations provide insight into repurposing drugs against SARS-CoV-2 variants Spike protein/ACE2 interface , 2023, Scientific Reports.

[6]  J. Bukh,et al.  Nirmatrelvir-resistant SARS-CoV-2 variants with high fitness in an infectious cell culture system , 2022, Science advances.

[7]  Zhanli Wang,et al.  Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening of Potential SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitors from Library of Natural Products , 2022, Natural Product Communications.

[8]  Markus K. Muellner,et al.  Current Challenges in Small Molecule Proximity-Inducing Compound Development for Targeted Protein Degradation Using the Ubiquitin Proteasomal System , 2022, Molecules.

[9]  Saleh K. Ihmaid,et al.  In vitro and computational investigations of novel synthetic carboxamide-linked pyridopyrrolopyrimidines with potent activity as SARS-CoV-2-MPro inhibitors , 2022, RSC advances.

[10]  A. Shayanfar,et al.  Comparison of various methods for validity evaluation of QSAR models , 2022, BMC Chemistry.

[11]  Legana C H W Fingerhut,et al.  Benchmarks in antimicrobial peptide prediction are biased due to the selection of negative data , 2022, Briefings Bioinform..

[12]  R. S. Ferreira,et al.  Designing drugs when there is low data availability: one-shot learning and other approaches to face the issues of a long-term concern , 2022, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[13]  Luke E K Achenie,et al.  Novel covalent and non-covalent complex-based pharmacophore models of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) elucidated by microsecond MD simulations , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Adriana Costa,et al.  SMILES-based 2D-QSAR and similarity search for identification of potential new scaffolds for development of SARS-CoV-2 MPRO inhibitors , 2022, Structural Chemistry.

[15]  D. Granato,et al.  Atherosclerosis fate in the era of tailored functional foods: Evidence-based guidelines elicited from structure- and ligand-based approaches , 2022, Trends in Food Science & Technology.

[16]  Yechun Xu,et al.  Small-Molecule Thioesters as SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitors: Enzyme Inhibition, Structure–Activity Relationships, Antiviral Activity, and X-ray Structure Determination , 2022, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  B. Sepehri,et al.  Identifying SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors by applying the computer screening of a large database of molecules , 2022, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[18]  J. Medina-Franco,et al.  Yes SIR! On the structure-inactivity relationships in drug discovery. , 2022, Drug discovery today.

[19]  James Guevara-Pulido,et al.  Design, Synthesis, and Development of 4‐[(7‐Chloroquinoline‐4‐yl)amino]phenol as a Potential SARS‐CoV‐2 Mpro Inhibitor , 2022, ChemistrySelect.

[20]  A. Afkhami,et al.  QSAR analysis on a large and diverse set of potent phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma (PI3Kγ) inhibitors using MLR and ANN methods , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[21]  J. Leszczynski,et al.  Identification of potential antivirals against 3CLpro enzyme for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2: A multi-step virtual screening study , 2022, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[22]  Arabinda Ghosh,et al.  Target Specific Inhibition of Protein Tyrosine Kinase in Conjunction With Cancer and SARS-COV-2 by Olive Nutraceuticals , 2022, Frontiers in Pharmacology.

[23]  T. Buclin,et al.  Evaluating the risk of drug-drug interactions with pharmacokinetic boosters: the case of ritonavir-enhanced nirmatrelvir to prevent severe COVID-19 , 2022, Clinical Microbiology and Infection.

[24]  M. Baniecki,et al.  Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19 , 2022, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  O. Watson,et al.  Modelling the impact of vaccine hesitancy in prolonging the need for Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to control the COVID-19 pandemic , 2022, Communications Medicine.

[26]  P. Tsai,et al.  Oral Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Therapy for COVID-19: The Dawn in the Dark? , 2022, Antibiotics.

[27]  L. Ratner,et al.  Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use: Managing clinically significant drug‐drug interactions with transplant immunosuppressants , 2022, American Journal of Transplantation.

[28]  Sara E. Gorman,et al.  Implications of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Results of Online Bulletin Board Interviews , 2022, Frontiers in Public Health.

[29]  S. Garcia-Vallvé,et al.  A Review of the Current Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitors: Have We Hit the Bullseye Yet? , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[30]  T. Alandijany,et al.  Computational and In Vitro Experimental Investigations Reveal Anti-Viral Activity of Licorice and Glycyrrhizin against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 , 2021, Pharmaceuticals.

[31]  G. M. Ferreira,et al.  SARS-COV-2 Mpro conformational changes induced by covalently bound ligands , 2021, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[32]  Shuai Bian,et al.  Computational strategies towards developing novel SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors against COVID-19 , 2021, Journal of Molecular Structure.

[33]  R. F. de Souza,et al.  Quantitative structure-activity relationships, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations reveal drug repurposing candidates as potent SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors , 2021, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[34]  S. Durdağı,et al.  Binary-QSAR guided virtual screening of FDA approved drugs and compounds in clinical investigation against SARS-CoV-2 main protease , 2021, Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi.

[35]  K. No,et al.  Comprehensive strategies of machine-learning-based quantitative structure-activity relationship models , 2021, iScience.

[36]  Md. Enamul Kabir Talukder,et al.  Pharmacophore-Based Virtual Screening, Quantum Mechanics Calculations, and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Approaches Identified Potential Natural Antiviral Drug Candidates against MERS-CoV S1-NTD , 2021, Molecules.

[37]  Yinzi Jin,et al.  Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccination among Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries: The Mediating Role of Vaccination Policy , 2021, Vaccines.

[38]  K. Gajiwala,et al.  An oral SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19 , 2021, Science.

[39]  A. Al Mamun,et al.  Remdesivir analogs against SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase , 2021, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[40]  J. Garrido,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Accessory Proteins in Viral Pathogenesis: Knowns and Unknowns , 2021, Frontiers in Immunology.

[41]  Tarek Kanan,et al.  Transcription factor NF-κB as target for SARS-CoV-2 drug discovery efforts using inflammation-based QSAR screening model , 2021, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling.

[42]  Scott J. Miller,et al.  Structure-guided design of a perampanel-derived pharmacophore targeting the SARS-CoV-2 main protease , 2021, Structure.

[43]  J. C. Gertrudes,et al.  Machine learning techniques applied to the drug design and discovery of new antivirals: a brief look over the past decade , 2021, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[44]  Arabinda Ghosh,et al.  Identification of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Compounds from Food Using QSAR-Based Virtual Screening, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Analysis , 2021, Pharmaceuticals.

[45]  F. Frueh,et al.  A Clinical-Stage Cysteine Protease Inhibitor blocks SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Human and Monkey Cells , 2021, ACS chemical biology.

[46]  Prachi Pradeep,et al.  Evaluation of Existing QSAR Models and Structural Alerts and Development of New Ensemble Models for Genotoxicity Using a Newly Compiled Experimental Dataset. , 2021, Computational toxicology.

[47]  R. Rubin COVID-19 Vaccines vs Variants-Determining How Much Immunity Is Enough. , 2021, JAMA.

[48]  H. Yassine,et al.  Identification of potential natural inhibitors of the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using a computational docking approach , 2021, Qatar medical journal.

[49]  H. Harapan,et al.  Myths and conspiracy theories on vaccines and COVID-19: Potential effect on global vaccine refusals , 2021, Vacunas.

[50]  Mariia Matveieva,et al.  Benchmarks for interpretation of QSAR models , 2021, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[51]  P. R. Oliveira,et al.  Knowing and combating the enemy: a brief review on SARS-CoV-2 and computational approaches applied to the discovery of drug candidates , 2021, Bioscience reports.

[52]  M. Battegay,et al.  Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Support the Clinical Management of Drug–Drug Interactions With Bictegravir , 2021, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[53]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Potent Noncovalent Inhibitors of the Main Protease of SARS-CoV-2 from Molecular Sculpting of the Drug Perampanel Guided by Free Energy Perturbation Calculations , 2021, ACS central science.

[54]  Yuquan Wei,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Mpro inhibitors with antiviral activity in a transgenic mouse model , 2021, Science.

[55]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Evaluation of multi-target deep neural network models for compound potency prediction under increasingly challenging test conditions , 2021, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[56]  M. Gillam,et al.  Novel Techniques to Assess Predictive Systems and Reduce Their Alarm Burden , 2021, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[57]  K. Héberger,et al.  Effect of Dataset Size and Train/Test Split Ratios in QSAR/QSPR Multiclass Classification , 2021, Molecules.

[58]  R. Bauer,et al.  Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities , 2021, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[59]  P. Dormitzer,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[60]  Susana P. Gaudêncio,et al.  A Computer-Aided Drug Design Approach to Predict Marine Drug-Like Leads for SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibition , 2020, Marine drugs.

[61]  Md. Anowar Khasru Parvez,et al.  Combination of QSAR, molecular docking, molecular dynamic simulation and MM-PBSA: analogues of lopinavir and favipiravir as potential drug candidates against COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[62]  Chunlong Ma,et al.  Structure and inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease reveal strategy for developing dual inhibitors against Mpro and cathepsin L , 2020, Science Advances.

[63]  C. Munteanu,et al.  Drugs Repurposing Using QSAR, Docking and Molecular Dynamics for Possible Inhibitors of the SARS-CoV-2 Mpro Protease , 2020, Molecules.

[64]  V. Thiel,et al.  Coronavirus biology and replication: implications for SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[65]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Identification of 14 Known Drugs as Inhibitors of the Main Protease of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[66]  F. J. Luque,et al.  Merging Ligand-Based and Structure-Based Methods in Drug Discovery: An Overview of Combined Virtual Screening Approaches , 2020, Molecules.

[67]  Vinicius M. Alves,et al.  QSAR Modeling of SARS‐CoV Mpro Inhibitors Identifies Sufugolix, Cenicriviroc, Proglumetacin, and other Drugs as Candidates for Repurposing against SARS‐CoV‐2 , 2020, Molecular informatics.

[68]  Sebastian Maurer-Stroh,et al.  Effects of a major deletion in the SARS-CoV-2 genome on the severity of infection and the inflammatory response: an observational cohort study , 2020, The Lancet.

[69]  A. Fauci,et al.  Emerging Pandemic Diseases: How We Got to COVID-19 , 2020, Cell.

[70]  Victória Riquena Grosche,et al.  Antivirals Against Coronaviruses: Candidate Drugs for SARS-CoV-2 Treatment? , 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[71]  S. Gayen,et al.  Chemical-informatics approach to COVID-19 drug discovery: Exploration of important fragments and data mining based prediction of some hits from natural origins as main protease (Mpro) inhibitors , 2020, Journal of Molecular Structure.

[72]  S. Perlman,et al.  3C-like protease inhibitors block coronavirus replication in vitro and improve survival in MERS-CoV–infected mice , 2020, Science Translational Medicine.

[73]  Alaa Tharwat,et al.  Classification assessment methods , 2020, Applied Computing and Informatics.

[74]  A. Mamun,et al.  Virtual screening, molecular dynamics and structure–activity relationship studies to identify potent approved drugs for Covid-19 treatment , 2020, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[75]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Principles of QSAR Modeling , 2020 .

[76]  Sk Abdul Amin,et al.  Chemical-informatics approach to COVID-19 drug discovery: Monte Carlo based QSAR, virtual screening and molecular docking study of some in-house molecules as papain-like protease (PLpro) inhibitors , 2020, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[77]  J. Abhithaj,et al.  Drug repurposing against SARS-CoV-2 using E-pharmacophore based virtual screening, molecular docking and molecular dynamics with main protease as the target , 2020, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[78]  Antti Poso,et al.  The application of machine learning techniques to innovative antibacterial discovery and development , 2020, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[79]  V Kumar,et al.  Development of a simple, interpretable and easily transferable QSAR model for quick screening antiviral databases in search of novel 3C-like protease (3CLpro) enzyme inhibitors against SARS-CoV diseases , 2020, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[80]  Simon Axelrod,et al.  GEOM: Energy-annotated molecular conformations for property prediction and molecular generation , 2020, ArXiv.

[81]  Artem Cherkasov,et al.  QSAR without borders. , 2020, Chemical Society reviews.

[82]  Hemant Kumar Srivastava,et al.  Peptide-like and small-molecule inhibitors against Covid-19 , 2020, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[83]  Hualiang Jiang,et al.  Structure of Mpro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors , 2020, Nature.

[84]  R. Hilgenfeld,et al.  Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease provides a basis for design of improved α-ketoamide inhibitors , 2020, Science.

[85]  Jiachen Sun,et al.  A guideline for homology modeling of the proteins from newly discovered betacoronavirus, 2019 novel coronavirus (2019‐nCoV) , 2020, Journal of medical virology.

[86]  Lixia Chen,et al.  Analysis of therapeutic targets for SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of potential drugs by computational methods , 2020, Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B.

[87]  Kyoung Tai No,et al.  Development of Natural Compound Molecular Fingerprint (NC-MFP) with the Dictionary of Natural Products (DNP) for natural product-based drug development , 2020, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[88]  Eric J. Deeds,et al.  Machine learning classification can reduce false positives in structure-based virtual screening , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[89]  D. Keays,et al.  Why (and how) we should publish negative data , 2019, EMBO reports.

[90]  P. Skolnick,et al.  Be positive about negatives–recommendations for the publication of negative (or null) results , 2019, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[91]  T. Kronenberger,et al.  Virtual screening of antibacterial compounds by similarity search of Enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI) inhibitors. , 2019, Future medicinal chemistry.

[92]  A. Shayanfar,et al.  Developing New Criteria for Validity Evaluation of Analytical Methods. , 2019, Journal of AOAC International.

[93]  Suman K. Chakravarti,et al.  Descriptor Free QSAR Modeling Using Deep Learning With Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks , 2019, Front. Artif. Intell..

[94]  Vinicius Gonçalves Maltarollo,et al.  HQSAR and random forest-based QSAR models for anti-T. vaginalis activities of nitroimidazoles derivatives. , 2019, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[95]  A. Whiteside,et al.  Twenty Years Of Antiretroviral Therapy For People Living With HIV: Global Costs, Health Achievements, Economic Benefits. , 2019, Health affairs.

[96]  M. Taragin Learning from negative findings , 2019, Israel Journal of Health Policy Research.

[97]  H. Bhatt,et al.  3D-QSAR (CoMFA, CoMSIA, HQSAR and topomer CoMFA), MD simulations and molecular docking studies on purinylpyridine derivatives as B-Raf inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma cancer , 2019, Structural Chemistry.

[98]  Adrià Cereto-Massagué,et al.  The Light and Dark Sides of Virtual Screening: What Is There to Know? , 2019, International journal of molecular sciences.

[99]  S. Gin,et al.  Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) Analysis of ZrO2-Containing Soda-Lime Borosilicate Glasses. , 2019, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[100]  Andrew R. Leach,et al.  Large scale comparison of QSAR and conformal prediction methods and their applications in drug discovery , 2019, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[101]  Pedro J. Ballester,et al.  Predicting Synergism of Cancer Drug Combinations Using NCI-ALMANAC Data , 2018, bioRxiv.

[102]  Xin Lu,et al.  The Development of Pharmacophore Modeling: Generation and Recent Applications in Drug Discovery. , 2018, Current pharmaceutical design.

[103]  Eugene N. Muratov,et al.  QSAR-Based Virtual Screening: Advances and Applications in Drug Discovery , 2018, Front. Pharmacol..

[104]  Hiromasa Kaneko,et al.  Beware of r2 even for test datasets: Using the latest measured y‐values (r2LM) in time series data analysis , 2018, Journal of Chemometrics.

[105]  M. A. Gómez-Nieto,et al.  Prediction of the datasets modelability for the building of QSAR classification models by means of the centroid based rivality index , 2018, Journal of Mathematical Chemistry.

[106]  Alessandro Giuliani,et al.  Improvement of quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project , 2018, Mutagenesis.

[107]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Prediction of Compound Profiling Matrices, Part II: Relative Performance of Multitask Deep Learning and Random Forest Classification on the Basis of Varying Amounts of Training Data , 2018, ACS omega.

[108]  Irene Luque Ruiz,et al.  Regression Modelability Index: A New Index for Prediction of the Modelability of Data Sets in the Development of QSAR Regression Models , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[109]  Irene Luque Ruiz,et al.  Study of Data Set Modelability: Modelability, Rivality, and Weighted Modelability Indexes , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[110]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Prediction of Compound Profiling Matrices Using Machine Learning , 2018, ACS omega.

[111]  Vinicius M. Alves,et al.  QSAR-Driven Design and Discovery of Novel Compounds With Antiplasmodial and Transmission Blocking Activities , 2018, Front. Pharmacol..

[112]  Matthieu Montes,et al.  Decoys Selection in Benchmarking Datasets: Overview and Perspectives , 2018, Front. Pharmacol..

[113]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  QSAR modeling of cumulative environmental end-points for the prioritization of hazardous chemicals. , 2018, Environmental science. Processes & impacts.

[114]  T. Kronenberger,et al.  On the relationship of anthranilic derivatives structure and the FXR (Farnesoid X receptor) agonist activity , 2018, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[115]  Jing Liu,et al.  Combining molecular docking and QSAR studies for modeling the anti-tyrosinase activity of aromatic heterocycle thiosemicarbazone analogues , 2018 .

[116]  M. Estrada,et al.  Impact assessment of the rational selection of training and test sets on the predictive ability of QSAR models , 2017, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[117]  Hao Zhu,et al.  Experimental Errors in QSAR Modeling Sets: What We Can Do and What We Cannot Do , 2017, ACS omega.

[118]  K. Roy,et al.  How important is to detect systematic error in predictions and understand statistical applicability domain of QSAR models , 2017 .

[119]  T. Kronenberger,et al.  Studies of Staphylococcus aureus FabI inhibitors: fragment-based approach based on holographic structure-activity relationship analyses. , 2017, Future medicinal chemistry.

[120]  Yanli Wang,et al.  PubChem BioAssay: 2017 update , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[121]  P. Weintraub The Importance of Publishing Negative Results , 2016, Journal of insect science.

[122]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  A Historical Excursus on the Statistical Validation Parameters for QSAR Models: A Clarification Concerning Metrics and Terminology , 2016, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[123]  M. C. Guimarães,et al.  Is conformation a fundamental descriptor in QSAR? A case for halogenated anesthetics , 2016, Beilstein journal of organic chemistry.

[124]  J. Irwin,et al.  Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[125]  K. Baumann,et al.  Chemoinformatic Classification Methods and their Applicability Domain , 2016, Molecular informatics.

[126]  Gustavo Henrique Goulart Trossini,et al.  Use of machine learning approaches for novel drug discovery , 2016, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[127]  Isidro Cortes-Ciriano,et al.  Comparing the Influence of Simulated Experimental Errors on 12 Machine Learning Algorithms in Bioactivity Modeling Using 12 Diverse Data Sets , 2015, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[128]  E. Phillips,et al.  The evolution of three decades of antiretroviral therapy: challenges, triumphs and the promise of the future. , 2015, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[129]  Arun K. Ghosh,et al.  Coronaviruses Resistant to a 3C-Like Protease Inhibitor Are Attenuated for Replication and Pathogenesis, Revealing a Low Genetic Barrier but High Fitness Cost of Resistance , 2014, Journal of Virology.

[130]  T. Chai,et al.  Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature , 2014 .

[131]  Marc C. Nicklaus,et al.  QSAR Modeling of Imbalanced High-Throughput Screening Data in PubChem , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[132]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Recent progress in understanding activity cliffs and their utility in medicinal chemistry. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[133]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Data Set Modelability by QSAR , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[134]  J. Dearden,et al.  QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to? , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[135]  K. Roy,et al.  Exploring structural requirements for a class of nucleoside inhibitors (PfdUTPase) as antimalarials: first report on QSAR, pharmacophore mapping and multiple docking studies. , 2013, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[136]  Kunal Roy,et al.  How far can virtual screening take us in drug discovery? , 2013, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[137]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Does Rational Selection of Training and Test Sets Improve the Outcome of QSAR Modeling? , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[138]  Michael B. Black,et al.  A comprehensive statistical analysis of predicting in vivo hazard using high-throughput in vitro screening. , 2012, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[139]  Michael M. Mysinger,et al.  Directory of Useful Decoys, Enhanced (DUD-E): Better Ligands and Decoys for Better Benchmarking , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[140]  P. Liang,et al.  Recent development of 3C and 3CL protease inhibitors for anti-coronavirus and anti-picornavirus drug discovery. , 2011, Biochemical Society transactions.

[141]  Sean Ekins,et al.  A quality alert and call for improved curation of public chemistry databases. , 2011, Drug discovery today.

[142]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Real External Predictivity of QSAR Models: How To Evaluate It? Comparison of Different Validation Criteria and Proposal of Using the Concordance Correlation Coefficient , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[143]  CHUN WEI YAP,et al.  PaDEL‐descriptor: An open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[144]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[145]  P. Hajduk,et al.  Cheminformatic tools for medicinal chemists. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[146]  Yvan Vander Heyden,et al.  Robust Cross-Validation of Linear Regression QSAR Models , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[147]  N. Shih,et al.  Challenges in modern drug discovery: a case study of boceprevir, an HCV protease inhibitor for the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. , 2008, Accounts of chemical research.

[148]  P. Roy,et al.  Exploring the impact of size of training sets for the development of predictive QSAR models , 2008 .

[149]  Gerta Rücker,et al.  y-Randomization and Its Variants in QSPR/QSAR , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[150]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external , 2007 .

[151]  Gerald M. Maggiora,et al.  On Outliers and Activity Cliffs-Why QSAR Often Disappoints , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[152]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models , 2003 .

[153]  Alexander Golbraikh,et al.  Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models , 2003, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[154]  R. Venkataraghavan,et al.  Atom pairs as molecular features in structure-activity studies: definition and applications , 1985, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[155]  C. Hansch,et al.  p-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure , 1964 .

[156]  V. Rastija,et al.  Effect of information leakage and method of splitting (rational and random) on external predictive ability and behavior of different statistical parameters of QSAR model , 2014, Medicinal Chemistry Research.

[157]  Santosh A. Khedkar,et al.  Successful applications of computer aided drug discovery: moving drugs from concept to the clinic. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[158]  Márcia M. C. Ferreira,et al.  Basic validation procedures for regression models in QSAR and QSPR studies: theory and application , 2009 .

[159]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Beware of q2! , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[160]  Alexander Wlodawer,et al.  Rational approach to AIDS drug design through structural biology. , 2002, Annual review of medicine.