Preferences for proxy attributes

A proxy attribute is an indirect measure of an ultimate decision objective. Keeney and Raiffa Keeney, R. L., H. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley, New York. argued that assessing utility functions over proxy attributes requires complex inferences that may exceed the human capacity for consistent judgment, thus biasing utility assessments. This hypothesis was tested in an experimental study of preferences for pollution control alternatives. Each decision maker made two sets of utility assessments: the first regarding outcomes described by the fundamental attributes "pollution control cost" and "pollution related illness"; the second regarding outcomes described by the fundamental attribute "pollution control cost" and the proxy attribute "pollution emissions level" which served as an indirect measure of illness. The subjects displayed a near universal bias to overweight the proxy attribute relative to the prescriptions of expected utility theory. The bias was large, resulting in a substantial loss of expected utility in a simulated policy decision making scenario. To account for this bias, we developed three heuristic models of preferences for proxy attributes: the best guess, worst case, and relative importance models. The results strongly favored the relative importance model, according to which decision makers assess scaling constants by relying on general attitudes regarding the relative importance of different decision objectives rather than on well-articulated preferences for rates of substitution between pairs of attributes.

[1]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Estimating utility functions in the presence of response error , 1987 .

[2]  S E Fienberg,et al.  Risk preferences for gains and losses in multiple objective decision making , 1986 .

[3]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[4]  P. Farquhar.  State of the Art—Utility Assessment Methods , 1984 .

[5]  John W. Payne,et al.  Multiattribute Risky Choice Behavior: The Editing of Complex Prospects , 1984 .

[6]  Imran S. Currim,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Multiattribute Consumer Preference Models , 1984 .

[7]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .

[8]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Additivity and expected utility in risky multiattribute preferences , 1980 .

[9]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Siting energy facilities , 1980 .

[10]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Are Important Weights Sensitive to the Range of Alternatives in Multiattribute Utility Measurement , 1978 .

[12]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Multidimensional utility models for risky and riskless choice , 1976 .

[13]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[14]  S. Richard.  Multivariate Risk Aversion, Utility Independence and Separable Utility Functions , 1975 .

[15]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[16]  Charles F. Gettys,et al.  The best guess hypothesis in multistage inference , 1973 .

[17]  A. Tversky.  Additivity, utility, and subjective probability , 1967 .

[18]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.