Rethinking Use-Wear Analysis and Experimentation as Applied to the Study of Past Hominin Tool Use

In prehistoric human populations, technologies played a fundamental role in the acquisition of different resources and are represented in the main daily living activities, such as with bone, wooden, and stone-tipped spears for hunting, and chipped-stone tools for butchering. Considering that paleoanthropologists and archeologists are focused on the study of different processes involved in the evolution of human behavior, investigating how hominins acted in the past through the study of evidence on archeological artifacts is crucial. Thus, investigating tool use is of major importance for a comprehensive understanding of all processes that characterize human choices of raw materials, techniques, and tool types. Many functional assumptions of tool use have been based on tool design and morphology according to archeologists’ interpretations and ethnographic observations. Such assumptions are used as baselines when inferring human behavior and have driven an improvement in the methods and techniques employed in functional studies over the past few decades. Here, while arguing that use-wear analysis is a key discipline to assess past hominin tool use and to interpret the organization and variability of artifact types in the archeological record, we aim to review and discuss the current state-of-the-art methods, protocols, and their limitations. In doing so, our discussion focuses on three main topics: (1) the need for fundamental improvements by adopting established methods and techniques from similar research fields, (2) the need to implement and combine different levels of experimentation, and (3) the crucial need to establish standards and protocols in order to improve data quality, standardization, repeatability, and reproducibility. By adopting this perspective, we believe that studies will increase the reliability and applicability of use-wear methods on tool function. The need for a holistic approach that combines not only use-wear traces but also tool technology, design, curation, durability, and efficiency is also debated and revised. Such a revision is a crucial step if archeologists want to build major inferences on human decision-making behavior and biocultural evolution processes.

[1]  Douglas B. Bamforth,et al.  Investigating Microwear Polishes with Blind Tests: The Institute Results in Context , 1988 .

[2]  W. James Stemp,et al.  Quantifying lithic microwear with load variation on experimental basalt flakes using LSCM and area-scale fractal complexity (Asfc) , 2015 .

[3]  G. Odell,et al.  Micro‐wear in perspective: A sympathetic response to Lawrence H. Keeley , 1975 .

[4]  A. M. Pollard,et al.  The surface alteration features of flint artefacts as a record of environmental processes , 2002 .

[5]  M. Vanhaeren,et al.  Archaeological Evidence for the Emergence of Language, Symbolism, and Music–An Alternative Multidisciplinary Perspective , 2003 .

[6]  Matthew Douglass,et al.  A Twenty-First Century Archaeology of Stone Artifacts , 2012 .

[7]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Logic of Inductive Inference , 1935 .

[8]  Ivan Calandra,et al.  A versatile mechanized setup for controlled experiments in archeology , 2020, STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research.

[9]  Ivan Calandra,et al.  Why should traceology learn from dental microwear, and vice-versa? , 2019, Journal of Archaeological Science.

[10]  E. H. Moss.  A review of “Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests” , 1987 .

[11]  Robert A. Foley,et al.  On stony ground: Lithic technology, human evolution, and the emergence of culture , 2003 .

[12]  W. James Stemp,et al.  Is Loading a Significantly Influential Factor in the Development of Lithic Microwear? An Experimental Test Using LSCM on Basalt from Olduvai Gorge , 2015 .

[13]  Michael J. O'Brien,et al.  Test, Model, and Method Validation: The Role of Experimental Stone Artifact Replication in Hypothesis-driven Archaeology , 2016 .

[14]  R. Grace.  REVIEW ARTICLE USE‐WEAR ANALYSIS: THE STATE OF THE ART , 1996 .

[15]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[16]  Lawrence H. Keeley,et al.  Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: A Microwear Analysis , 1979 .

[17]  R. Fullagar,et al.  Making Sense of Residues on Flaked Stone Artefacts: Learning from Blind Tests , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  Veerle Rots,et al.  Extracting residues from stone tools for optical analysis: towards an experiment-based protocol , 2018, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[19]  W. James Stemp,et al.  Surface analysis of stone and bone tools , 2015 .

[20]  Matthew A. Gleason,et al.  Testing imaging confocal microscopy, laser scanning confocal microscopy, and focus variation microscopy for microscale measurement of edge cross-sections and calculation of edge curvature on stone tools: Preliminary results , 2019, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports.

[21]  I. de la Torre,et al.  Raw material optimization and stone tool engineering in the Early Stone Age of Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania) , 2020, Journal of the Royal Society Interface.

[22]  N. Bicho,et al.  Use-wear and residue analysis in archaeology , 2015 .

[23]  Alan K. Outram,et al.  Introduction to experimental archaeology , 2008 .

[24]  Patricia Anderson,et al.  Standardization, calibration and innovation: a special issue on lithic microwear method , 2014 .

[25]  Veerle Rots,et al.  Projectiles and the abuse of the use-wear method in a search for impact , 2014 .

[26]  Thomas R. Hester,et al.  Lithic use-wear analysis , 1982, American Antiquity.

[27]  Lawrence H. Keeley,et al.  Technique and methodology in microwear studies: A critical review , 1974 .

[28]  F. Bordes.  Typologie du paléolithique : ancien et moyen , 1988 .

[29]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  Flake variation in relation to the application of force , 2014 .

[30]  K. Laland,et al.  Experimental Evidence for the Co-Evolution of Hominin Tool-Making Teaching and Language , 2014, Nature Communications.

[31]  S. A. Semenov.  The forms and functions of the oldest tools , 1970 .

[32]  Ivan Calandra,et al.  The effect of numerical aperture on quantitative use-wear studies and its implication on reproducibility , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Natacha Buc,et al.  Experimental series and use-wear in bone tools , 2011 .

[34]  N. Conard,et al.  Residue and microwear analyses of the stone artifacts from Schöningen. , 2015, Journal of human evolution.

[35]  A. Mackay,et al.  Why Was Silcrete Heat-Treated in the Middle Stone Age? An Early Transformative Technology in the Context of Raw Material Use at Mertenhof Rock Shelter, South Africa , 2016, PloS one.

[36]  J. Shea.  On Accuracy and Revelance in Lithic Use-wear Analysis , 1987 .

[37]  B. Williamson,et al.  Microwear and residue analyses in perspective: the contribution of ethnoarchaeological evidence , 2004 .

[38]  L. Binford.  Constructing frames of reference : an analytical method for archaeological theory building using hunter-gatherer and environmental data sets , 2001 .

[39]  Johan Kamminga,et al.  The nature of use-polish and abrasive smoothing on stone tools , 1979 .

[40]  J. J. Ibáñez,et al.  Identifying Experimental Tool Use Through Confocal Microscopy , 2018, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory.

[41]  D. Schmitt,et al.  Experimental Evidence Concerning Spear Use in Neandertals and Early Modern Humans , 2003 .

[42]  W. Stemp,et al.  Discrimination of surface wear on obsidian tools using LSCM and RelA: pilot study results (area-scale analysis of obsidian tool surfaces). , 2011, Scanning.

[43]  George H. Odell,et al.  Stone Tool Research at the End of the Millennium: Procurement and Technology , 2000 .

[44]  D. Braun,et al.  Earliest Stone-Tipped Projectiles from the Ethiopian Rift Date to >279,000 Years Ago , 2013, PloS one.

[45]  Antonio Pérez Balarezo,et al.  Book review: Techno-logique & technologie: Une paléo-histoire des objets lithiques tranchants , 2018 .

[46]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  Introducing a new experimental design for controlled studies of flake formation: results for exterior platform angle, platform depth, angle of blow, velocity, and force , 2009 .

[47]  Ivan Calandra,et al.  Back to the edge: relative coordinate system for use-wear analysis , 2019, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[48]  A. Pedergnana.  “All that glitters is not gold”: Evaluating the Nature of the Relationship Between Archeological Residues and Stone Tool Function , 2019, Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology.

[49]  Patrick C. Vaughan,et al.  Use-Wear Analysis of Flaked Stone Tools , 1985 .

[50]  S. Ambrose.  Paleolithic Technology and Human Evolution , 2001, Science.

[51]  Jenny L. Adams.  Ground stone use-wear analysis: a review of terminology and experimental methods , 2014 .

[52]  L. Hurcombe.  Some criticisms and suggestions in response to Newcomer et al. (1986) , 1988 .

[53]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Replicating surface texture: Preliminary testing of molding compound accuracy for surface measurements , 2018 .

[54]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  Experimental Design and Experimental Inference in Stone Artifact Archaeology , 2018 .

[55]  Brian Hayden.  Palaeolithic reflections : lithic technology and ethnographic excavation among Australian Aborigines , 1982 .

[56]  G. Mccall,et al.  Ethnoarchaeology and the Organization of Lithic Technology , 2012 .

[57]  F. d’Errico,et al.  An early bone tool industry from the Middle Stone Age at Blombos Cave, South Africa: implications for the origins of modern human behaviour, symbolism and language. , 2001, Journal of human evolution.

[58]  Mark H. Newcomer,et al.  The quantification of microwear polishes , 1985 .

[59]  R. Lewis,et al.  Abrasive and impact wear of stone used to manufacture axes in Neolithic Greece , 2011 .

[60]  M. Domański,et al.  Effect of heat treatment on Siliceous rocks used in prehistoric lithic technology , 1992 .

[61]  Stéphanie Bonilauri.  Les outils du Paléolithique moyen, une mémoire technique oubliée ? Approche techno-fonctionnelle appliquée à un assemblage lithique de conception Levallois provenant du site d’Umm el Tlel (Syrie centrale) , 2010 .

[62]  G. Odell,et al.  Experimentation in the Formation of Edge Damage: A New Approach to Lithic Analysis , 1974 .

[63]  C. Lemorini,et al.  Early evidence of stone tool use in bone working activities at Qesem Cave, Israel , 2016, Scientific reports.

[64]  N. Bicho,et al.  Macro and Micro Evidences from the Past: The State of the Art of Archeological Use-Wear Studies , 2015 .

[65]  J. Boland,et al.  MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF STONE ARTEFACT MATERIALS AND THE EFFECT OF HEAT TREATMENT , 1994 .

[66]  P. Phillips.  Traceology (Microwear) studies in the USSR , 1988 .

[67]  W. Andrefsky.  Raw-Material Availability and the Organization of Technology , 1994, American Antiquity.

[68]  Brett A. Story,et al.  The role of raw material differences in stone tool shape variation: an experimental assessment , 2014 .

[69]  Adrian A. Evans,et al.  Laser scanning confocal microscopy: a potential technique for the study of lithic microwear , 2008 .

[70]  William Andrefsky,et al.  The Analysis of Stone Tool Procurement, Production, and Maintenance , 2009 .

[71]  John V. Dumont,et al.  The quantification of microwear traces: a new use for interferometry , 1982 .

[72]  Roger Grace,et al.  Interpreting the function of stone tools : the quantification and computerisation of microwear analysis , 1989 .

[73]  Erin Marie Williams-Hatala,et al.  The manual pressures of stone tool behaviors and their implications for the evolution of the human hand. , 2018, Journal of human evolution.

[74]  M. Domínguez‐Rodrigo,et al.  The meat of the matter: an evolutionary perspective on human carnivory , 2017 .

[75]  Alastair J.M. Key,et al.  Edge Angle as a Variably Influential Factor in Flake Cutting Efficiency: An Experimental Investigation of Its Relationship with Tool Size and Loading , 2015 .

[76]  Frieder Enzmann,et al.  Evidence for close-range hunting by last interglacial Neanderthals , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[77]  A A Evans,et al.  Using metrology in early prehistoric stone tool research: further work and a brief instrument comparison. , 2011, Scanning.

[78]  James W. Vanstone,et al.  Introduction To Baron F.P. Von Wrangell's Observations On the Eskimos and Indians of Alaska , 1970 .

[79]  Sam C. Lin,et al.  An experimental assessment of the influences on edge damage to lithic artifacts: A consideration of edge angle, substrate grain size, raw material properties, and exposed face , 2014 .

[80]  C. Marean,et al.  An early and enduring advanced technology originating 71,000 years ago in South Africa , 2012, Nature.

[81]  Peter J. Nilssen,et al.  Early human use of marine resources and pigment in South Africa during the Middle Pleistocene , 2007, Nature.

[82]  Sam C. Lin,et al.  Variance in the response of silcrete to rapid heating complicates assumptions about past heat treatment methods , 2018, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[83]  S. Piggott,et al.  A History of Archaeological Thought , 1989 .

[84]  M. W. Thompson,et al.  Prehistoric technology : an experimental study of the oldest tools and artefacts from traces of manufacture and wear , 1970 .

[85]  Hassan Zahouani,et al.  Wear assessments of prehistoric instruments , 2003 .

[86]  Alastair J.M. Key,et al.  Integrating Mechanical and Ergonomic Research within Functional and Morphological Analyses of Lithic Cutting Technology: Key Principles and Future Experimental Directions , 2016 .

[87]  Lewis R. Binford,et al.  Archaeology as Anthropology , 1962, American Antiquity.

[88]  A. Ollé,et al.  Reality and confusion in the recognition of post-depositional alterations and use-wear: an experimental approach on basalt tools , 2014 .

[89]  F. d’Errico,et al.  Assessing the function of early hominin bone tools , 2009 .

[90]  W. James Stemp,et al.  Documenting Stages of Polish Development on Experimental Stone Tools: Surface Characterization by Fractal Geometry Using UBM Laser Profilometry , 2002 .

[91]  Jessica C. Thompson,et al.  An experimental investigation of cut mark production and stone tool attrition , 2008 .

[92]  Harry Lerner.  Intra-raw material variability and use-wear accrual: A continuing exploration , 2014 .

[93]  Shannon P McPherron,et al.  Time wears on: Assessing how bone wears using 3D surface texture analysis , 2018, PloS one.

[94]  L. H. Keeley,et al.  Microwear analysis of experimental flint tools: a test case , 1977 .

[95]  R. Klein.  Archeology and the evolution of human behavior , 2000 .

[96]  F. Bordes,et al.  The significance of variability in Palaeolithic assemblages , 1970 .

[97]  Metin I. Eren,et al.  Flaked stone taphonomy: a controlled experimental study of the effetcs of sediment consolidation on flake edge morphology , 2011 .

[98]  Harry J. Lerner,et al.  Testing Area‐Scale Fractal Complexity (Asfc) and Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSCM) to Document and Discriminate Microwear on Experimental Quartzite Scrapers , 2018 .

[99]  Sophie Collins,et al.  Experimental investigations into edge performance and its implications for stone artefact reduction modelling , 2008 .

[100]  Sam C. Lin.  Experimentation and scientific inference building in the study of hominin behavior through stone artifact archaeology , 2014 .

[101]  L. Righetti,et al.  Birch tar production does not prove Neanderthal behavioral complexity , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[102]  Radu Iovita,et al.  Projectile impact fractures and launching mechanisms: results of a controlled ballistic experiment using replica Levallois points , 2014 .

[103]  F. Diez-Martín,et al.  The origin of the Acheulean. Techno-functional study of the FLK W lithic record (Olduvai, Tanzania) , 2017, PloS one.

[104]  L. Kimball,et al.  Atomic force microscopy of microwear traces on Mousterian tools from Myshtylagty Lagat (Weasel Cave), Russia. , 2011, Scanning.

[105]  B. Bril,et al.  How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. , 2010, Journal of human evolution.

[106]  G. Langejans.  Remains of the day-preservation of organic micro-residues on stone tools , 2010 .

[107]  George H. Odell,et al.  The Mechanics of Use-Breakage of Stone Tools: Some Testable Hypotheses , 1981 .

[108]  G. Merceron,et al.  Dental microwear texture analysis in mammalian ecology , 2016 .

[109]  Xiangdong Du,et al.  Lithic raw material physical properties and use-wear accrual , 2007 .

[110]  J. Vergès,et al.  The use of sequential experiments and SEM in documenting stone tool microwear , 2014 .

[111]  Bruce L. Hardy,et al.  Identification of Woodworking on Stone Tools through Residue and Use-Wear Analyses: Experimental Results , 1998 .

[112]  W. James Stemp,et al.  A review of quantification of lithic use-wear using laser profilometry: a method based on metrology and fractal analysis , 2014 .

[113]  Jonas Buchli,et al.  Dynamic Monitoring Reveals Motor Task Characteristics in Prehistoric Technical Gestures , 2015, PloS one.

[114]  P. Jeffrey Brantingham,et al.  A Neutral Model of Stone Raw Material Procurement , 2003, American Antiquity.

[115]  R. Fullagar.  Residues and usewear , 2014 .

[116]  Christopher A. Brown,et al.  Dental microwear texture analysis shows within-species diet variability in fossil hominins , 2005, Nature.

[117]  Alastair J.M. Key,et al.  A citation network analysis of lithic microwear research , 2018 .

[118]  R. Risch,et al.  The mechanical properties of macrolithic artifacts: a methodological background for functional analysis , 2009 .

[119]  Veerle Rots.  Prehension and Hafting Traces on Flint Tools , 2013 .

[120]  George H. Odell,et al.  Stone Tool Research at the End of the Millennium: Classification, Function, and Behavior , 2001 .

[121]  A. Ollé,et al.  Monitoring and interpreting the use-wear formation processes on quartzite flakes through sequential experiments , 2017 .

[122]  Jayne Wilkins,et al.  The performance of heat-treated silcrete backed pieces in actualistic and controlled complex projectile experiments , 2017 .

[123]  W. James Stemp,et al.  UBM Laser Profilometry and Lithic Use-Wear Analysis: A Variable Length Scale Investigation of Surface Topography , 2001 .

[124]  J. Shea.  Stone tool analysis and human origins research: Some advice from uncle Screwtape , 2011, Evolutionary anthropology.

[125]  R. Passingham,et al.  Technology, expertise and social cognition in human evolution , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[126]  Jonas Buchli,et al.  Influence of force and duration on stone tool wear: results from experiments with a force-controlled robot , 2018, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.

[127]  Laure Dubreuil,et al.  Ground stones: a synthesis of the use-wear approach , 2014 .

[128]  Adrian A. Evans,et al.  The elemental chemistry of lithic microwear: an experiment , 2005 .

[129]  A. Ollé,et al.  Applying SEM to the study of use-wear on unmodified shell tools: an experimental approach , 2015 .

[130]  Benjamin J. Schoville.  Testing a taphonomic predictive model of edge damage formation with Middle Stone Age points from Pinnacle Point Cave 13B and Die Kelders Cave 1, South Africa , 2014 .

[131]  Mark H Newcomer,et al.  Investigating microwear polishes with blind tests , 1986 .

[132]  I. Sala.  Use wear and post-depositional surface modification: A word of caution , 1986 .

[133]  A. Brooks,et al.  The revolution that wasn't: a new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. , 2000, Journal of human evolution.

[134]  P. Goldberg,et al.  How heat alters underlying deposits and implications for archaeological fire features: A controlled experiment , 2016 .

[135]  Antony Borel,et al.  Scanning Electron and Optical Light Microscopy: two complementary approaches for the understanding and interpretation of usewear and residues on stone tools , 2014 .

[136]  G. Langejans.  Discerning use-related micro-residues on tools: testing the multi-stranded approach for archaeological studies , 2011 .

[137]  Justin Bradfield,et al.  Use-Trace Epistemology and the Logic of Inference , 2016 .

[138]  W. Stemp,et al.  Quantifying microwear on experimental Mistassini quartzite scrapers: preliminary results of exploratory research using LSCM and scale-sensitive fractal analysis. , 2013, Scanning.

[139]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  Major Fallacies Surrounding Stone Artifacts and Assemblages , 2017 .

[140]  G. Ocklind,et al.  Some Preliminary Observations on Subsurface Damage on Experimental and Archaeological Quartz Tools using CLSM and Dye , 2001 .

[141]  A. L. Gijn.  Science and interpretation in microwear studies , 2014 .

[142]  Adrian A. Evans,et al.  On the importance of blind testing in archaeological science: the example from lithic functional studies , 2014 .

[143]  Juan José Ibáñez-Estévez,et al.  The Quantification of Use-Wear Polish Using Image Analysis. First Results , 2003 .

[144]  A. Queffelec,et al.  Quantifying lithic surface alterations using confocal microscopy and its relevance for exploring the Châtelperronian at La Roche-à-Pierrot (Saint-Césaire, France) , 2019, Journal of Archaeological Science.

[145]  S. Kuhn.  On Planning and Curated Technologies in the Middle Paleolithic , 1992, Journal of Anthropological Research.