The Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test: An Assessment Tool for Clinical Research Subjects

We developed an instrument to assess comprehension of informed consent information among 275 adults entering one of four ambulatory trials. At the conclusion of trial enrollment, subjects rated their understanding of the information presented and completed the Deaconess Informed Consent Comprehension Test (DICCT). Subjects completed the vocabulary subtest of the revised Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS‐R) and the reading subtest of the revised Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT‐R). The DICCT for 50 subjects was scored by 2 blinded investigators. Interrater agreement was 0.84 (df = 49, p<0.001). To investigate the DICCT's potential validity, its scores were correlated with WAIS‐R vocabulary scores (r = 0.44, df = 199, p<0.01) and WRAT‐R reading scores (r = 0.39, df = 268, p<0.01). Understanding of consent information was rated as thorough by 70% of subjects. The mean ± SD DICCT score was 20.4 ± 3.9. The DICCT is a reliable instrument to assess comprehension of informed consent information. There is preliminary evidence for the scale's validity. The subjects believed that they had greater understanding of study information than was shown by the DICCT.

[1]  J. F. Sturr,et al.  Evaluating informed consent for research: a methodological study with older adults. , 1990, Educational gerontology.

[2]  H. Taub Comprehension of informed consent for research: issues and directions for future study. , 1986, IRB.

[3]  M. Folstein,et al.  The Hopkins Competency Assessment Test: a brief method for evaluating patients' capacity to give informed consent. , 1992, Hospital & community psychiatry.

[4]  H. Taub,et al.  The effect of repeated testing upon comprehension of informed consent materials by elderly volunteers. , 1983, Experimental aging research.

[5]  R. Flesch A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  N. Tallent Psychological testing. , 1960, The American journal of nursing.

[7]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Comprehension and recall of the informational content of the informed consent document : an evaluation of 168 patients in a controlled clinical trial , 1994 .

[8]  G. McCloskey Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised , 1987 .

[9]  I. Schwab,et al.  Informed consent in senile cataract extraction. , 1986, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  John R. Williams DECLARATION OF HELSINKI , 1964 .

[11]  E D Freis,et al.  Informed consent: How much does the patient understand? , 1980, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[12]  G. F. Judisch,et al.  Informed Consent. Legal Theory and Clinical Practice , 1988 .

[13]  J. Ogloff,et al.  Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research. , 1991, Ethics & behavior.