Spatial resolution in CBCT machines for dental/maxillofacial applications-what do we know today?

Spatial resolution is one of the most important parameters objectively defining image quality, particularly in dental imaging, where fine details often have to be depicted. Here, we review the current status on assessment parameters for spatial resolution and on published data regarding spatial resolution in CBCT images. The current concepts of visual [line-pair (lp) measurements] and automated [modulation transfer function (MTF)] assessment of spatial resolution in CBCT images are summarized and reviewed. Published measurement data on spatial resolution in CBCT are evaluated and analysed. Effective (i.e. actual) spatial resolution available in CBCT images is being influenced by the two-dimensional detector, the three-dimensional reconstruction process, patient movement during the scan and various other parameters. In the literature, the values range between 0.6 and 2.8 lp mm(-1) (visual assessment; median, 1.7 lp mm(-1)) vs MTF (range, 0.5-2.3 cycles per mm; median, 2.1 lp mm(-1)). Spatial resolution of CBCT images is approximately one order of magnitude lower than that of intraoral radiographs. Considering movement, scatter effects and other influences in real-world scans of living patients, a realistic spatial resolution of just above 1 lp mm(-1) could be expected.

[1]  J T Dobbins,et al.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. , 1995, Medical physics.

[2]  John W Ballrick,et al.  Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  Penelope Allisy-Roberts,et al.  Comprar Farr's Physics for Medical Imaging | Penelope J. Allisy-Roberts | 9780702028441 | Saunders , 2007 .

[4]  I A Cunningham,et al.  Normalization of the modulation transfer function: the open-field approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[5]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  High-contrast resolution of CT images for bone structure analysis. , 1992, Medical physics.

[6]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response. , 2010, Medical physics.

[7]  Ulrich Neitzel,et al.  Determination of the modulation transfer function using the edge method: influence of scattered radiation. , 2004, Medical physics.

[8]  Kazuyuki Araki,et al.  Image quality assessment of three cone beam CT machines using the SEDENTEXCT CT phantom. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  Jaroslav Dusek,et al.  Movement of the patient and the cone beam computed tomography scanner: objectives and possible solutions. , 2013, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[10]  A Dogariu,et al.  Angular dependence of sampling modulation transfer function. , 1997, Applied optics.

[11]  Ralf Schulze,et al.  Contrast curves of five different intraoral X-ray sensors: a technical note. , 2013, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[12]  J. C. Dainty,et al.  Image Science: Principles, Analysis and Evaluation of Photographic-Type Imaging Processes , 1974 .

[13]  Christian Steiding,et al.  A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography. , 2014, Medical physics.

[14]  D. Tyndall,et al.  Application of cone beam volumetric tomography in endodontics. , 2012, Australian dental journal.

[15]  Xiaochuan Pan,et al.  Image reconstruction with a shift‐variant filtration in circular cone‐beam CT , 2004, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[16]  J M Boone,et al.  Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography. , 2001, Medical physics.

[17]  A Wenzel,et al.  Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: visual characteristics and impact on image quality. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[18]  R Schulze,et al.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[19]  Kunio Doi,et al.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  G C Sharp,et al.  GPU-based streaming architectures for fast cone-beam CT image reconstruction and demons deformable registration , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  K. Mueller,et al.  Fast and accurate three-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam projection data using algebraic methods , 1998 .

[22]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Development and applicability of a quality control phantom for dental cone‐beam CT , 2011, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[23]  S. Kösling,et al.  Qualitätsvergleich digitaler 3D-fähiger Röntgenanlagen bei HNO-Fragestellungen am Schläfenbein und den Nasennebenhöhlen , 2012 .

[24]  Jeroen Kalkman,et al.  Heartbeat-induced axial motion artifacts in optical coherence tomography measurements of the retina. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  W. Kalender,et al.  Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT) , 2007, European Radiology.

[26]  M Kortesniemi,et al.  Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. , 2009, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[27]  Frank Bergner,et al.  An investigation of 4D cone-beam CT algorithms for slowly rotating scanners. , 2010, Medical physics.

[28]  P. Judy,et al.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. , 1976, Medical physics.

[29]  Harry Nyquist.  Certain Topics in Telegraph Transmission Theory , 1928 .

[30]  A Gahleitner,et al.  Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[31]  E Honda,et al.  Modulation transfer function evaluation of cone beam computed tomography for dental use with the oversampling method. , 2010, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[32]  E L Nickoloff,et al.  A simplified approach for modulation transfer function determinations in computed tomography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[33]  H. Tuy.  AN INVERSION FORMULA FOR CONE-BEAM RECONSTRUCTION* , 1983 .

[34]  P. Allisy-Roberts,et al.  Farr's Physics for Medical Imaging , 2007 .

[35]  Qihua Zhao,et al.  Active pixel imagers incorporating pixel-level amplifiers based on polycrystalline-silicon thin-film transistors. , 2009, Medical physics.

[36]  R L Morin,et al.  A practical method to measure the MTF of CT scanners. , 1982, Medical physics.

[37]  J. Siewerdsen,et al.  Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols. , 2012, Medical physics.

[38]  Ulrich Neitzel,et al.  Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image. , 2003, Medical physics.

[39]  K Horner,et al.  Dental CBCT equipment and performance issues. , 2013, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[40]  K. Kamburoğlu,et al.  A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[41]  Location dependency of the spatial resolution of cone beam computed tomography for dental use. , 2013, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[42]  G. Boreman.  Modulation Transfer Function , 1998 .

[43]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners. , 2012, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[44]  Li Minghui,et al.  Image quality of cone beam CT on respiratory motion , 2013 .

[45]  K Doi,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. I. Modulation transfer function. , 1984, Medical physics.

[46]  W J Ralph,et al.  The minimal width of the periodontal space. , 1984, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[47]  D D Brüllmann,et al.  The modulation transfer function and signal-to-noise ratio of different digital filters: a technical approach. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[48]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Reducing Body Radiation Dose at Ct: Feasibility Study Hara Et Al. Ct Iterative Reconstruction Technique Gastrointestinal Imaging Original Research , 2022 .

[49]  Lei Dong,et al.  Reducing metal artifacts in cone-beam CT images by preprocessing projection data. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[50]  J. Ehrhardt,et al.  Modulation transfer function of the EMI CT head scanner. , 1977, Medical physics.

[51]  Jérôme Michetti,et al.  Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[52]  P. Mozzo,et al.  A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results , 1998, European Radiology.

[53]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .