Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Paul J. McMurdie,et al. DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.
[2] Erik S. Wright,et al. Inhibitory interactions promote frequent bistability among competing bacteria , 2016, Nature Communications.
[3] Erik S. Wright,et al. Using DECIPHER v2.0 to Analyze Big Biological Sequence Data in R , 2016, R J..
[4] John G Kenny,et al. A comprehensive benchmarking study of protocols and sequencing platforms for 16S rRNA community profiling , 2016, BMC Genomics.
[5] C. Quince,et al. Insight into biases and sequencing errors for amplicon sequencing with the Illumina MiSeq platform , 2015, Nucleic acids research.
[6] Sharon L. Grim,et al. Analysis, Optimization and Verification of Illumina-Generated 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Surveys , 2014, PloS one.
[7] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[8] Martin Kircher,et al. Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform , 2011, Nucleic acids research.
[9] Margaret C. Linak,et al. Sequence-specific error profile of Illumina sequencers , 2011, Nucleic acids research.
[10] Hideaki Sugawara,et al. The Sequence Read Archive , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..
[11] Patrick J. Biggs,et al. SolexaQA: At-a-glance quality assessment of Illumina second-generation sequencing data , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.
[12] Juliane C. Dohm,et al. Substantial biases in ultra-short read data sets from high-throughput DNA sequencing , 2008, Nucleic acids research.