Abstract BPR has become a hot buzzword in management and information systems disciplines. However, there is a lacuna in recognizing the characteristics and the way of performing BPR. In this paper, we categorize the reasons for BPR failure as the lack of understanding of and the inability to perform BPR, and we reviewed BPR based on the four key concepts: fundamental, radical, dramatic, and process. We argue that SSM can be applied in performing BPR in the following ways: 1. (1) SSM can be a general methodology for BPR, 2. (2) SSM can be an analytical framework for BPR, and 3. (3) SSM is able to deal with the ill-defined and complex business situation in a BPR effort. To illustrate the applicability of SSM in the context of BPR, we describe a live case of a BPR effort in developing and implementing an image processing system for hospital ward ordering. Finally, in order to demonstrate the power of SSM, by extending SSM considerations of What/How, we elaborate further on the What's and How's conceptual framework of an analysis and redesign effort. Based on this framework, we review the roles of information technologies in BPR.
[1]
Saul J. Berman.
Strategic direction: Don't reengineer without it
,
1994
.
[2]
Ivar Jacobson,et al.
The object advantage - business process reengineering with object technology
,
1994
.
[3]
Bill Curtis,et al.
Process modeling
,
1992,
CACM.
[4]
Peter Checkland,et al.
Soft Systems Methodology in Action
,
1990
.
[5]
Michael J. Earl,et al.
How new is business process redesign
,
1994
.
[6]
Peter Checkland,et al.
Systems Thinking, Systems Practice
,
1981
.
[7]
Thomas H. Davenport,et al.
Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology
,
1992
.
[8]
אסתר טולידנו,et al.
מקבלי דמי אבטלה בשנת 1993
,
1994
.
[9]
M. Hammer,et al.
REENGINEERING THE CORPORATION: A MANIFESTO FOR BUSINESS REVOLUTION
,
1995
.
[10]
M. Lynne Markus,et al.
PRECONDITIONS FOR BPR SUCCESS And How to Prevent Failures
,
1994
.