Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.

Mechanical responses to one- and two-tone acoustic stimuli were recorded from the cochlear partition in the apical turn of the chinchilla cochlea, the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea, and the hook region of the guinea pig cochlea. The most sensitive or "best" frequencies (BFs) for the sites studied were approximately 500 Hz, 17 kHz, and 30 kHz, respectively. Responses to the cubic difference tone (CDT), 2F1 - F2 (where F1 and F2 are the frequencies of the primary stimuli), were characterized at each site. Responses to the quadratic difference tone (QDT), F2 - F1, were also characterized in the apical turn preparations (QDT responses were too small to measure in the basal cochlea). The observed responses to BF QDTs and CDTs and to BF CDTs at each site appeared similar in many ways; the relative magnitudes of the responses were highest at low-to-moderate sound pressure levels (SPLs), for example, and the absolute magnitudes grew nonmonotonically with increases in the level of either primary (L1 or L2) alone. The peak effective levels of the CDT and QDT responses were also similar, at around -20 dB re L1 and/or L2. In other respects, however, the responses to CDTs and QDTs and to BF CDTs at each site behaved quite differently. At low-to-moderate SPLs, for example, most CDT phase leads decreased with increases in either L1 or L2, whereas most QDT phase leads increased with increasing L1 and varied little with L2. Most CDT responses also varied monotonically with equal-level primaries (i.e., when L1 = L2), whereas most QDT responses varied nonmonotonically. Different responses also varied in different ways when F1 and F2 were varied. Apical turn QDT responses were observed over a very wide F1/F2 range (F1 = 1-12 kHz), but were usually largest for stimuli <2-4 kHz. Apical turn CDT levels decreased (at rates of approximately 40-80 dB/octave) only when the frequency ratio F2/F1 increased beyond approximately 1.4-1.5. In the basal turn and hook regions, the CDT levels depended nonmonotonically on F2/F1 with the eventual rates of decrease being approximately 200 dB/octave. Optimal frequency ratios for the CDT increased from (F2 < 1.1F1) to (F2 approximately 1.2F1) with increasing SPL in the basal turn, but were stable at around F2/F1 approximately 1.05 in the hook region. CDT phase leads tended to increase with increasing F2/F1 in all three regions of the cochlea, particularly at low-to-moderate SPLs. These findings are discussed in relation to previous studies of cochlear mechanics, physiology, and psychophysics.

[1]  J R Johnstone,et al.  Basilar membrane and middle-ear vibration in guinea pig measured by capacitive probe. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  E Zwicker,et al.  Suppression and (2f1-f2)-difference tones in a nonlinear cochlear preprocessing model with active feedback. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  J. L. Hall Auditory Distortion Products f2−f1 and 2f1−f2 , 1972 .

[4]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone distortion on the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Eberhard Zwicker,et al.  Dependence of level and phase of the (2f1−f2)‐cancellation tone on frequency range, frequency difference, level of primaries, and subject , 1981 .

[6]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Clinical Testing of Distortion‐Product Otoacoustic Emissions , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[7]  A L Nuttall,et al.  Inner hair cell responses to the 2f1-f2 intermodulation distortion product. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  D. D. Greenwood,et al.  Some preliminary observations on the interrelations between two-tone suppression and combination-tone driving in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Correlates of combination tones observed in the response of neurons in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  D O Kim,et al.  Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behavior in two-tone responses as reflected in cochlear-nerve-fiber responses and in ear-canal sound pressure. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Basilar membrane mechanics in the hook region of cat and guinea-pig cochleae: Sharp tuning and nonlinearity in the absence of baseline position shifts , 1992, Hearing Research.

[12]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Two-tone distortion in the basilar membrane of the cochlea , 1991, Nature.

[13]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Responses of fibers in the cat's auditory nerve to the cubic difference tone. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  Compatibility between psychophysical and physiological measurements of aural combination tones. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Two-tone rate suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: Dependence on suppressor frequency and level , 1990, Hearing Research.

[16]  L. Robles,et al.  Basilar membrane responses to two-tone and broadband stimuli. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mössbauer technique. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Different behaviour of quadratic and cubic difference tones , 1979, Hearing Research.

[19]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Intermodulation distortion (F2-F1) in inner hair cell and basilar membrane responses. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  William S. Rhode,et al.  Two-tone suppression and distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae , 1993, Hearing Research.

[21]  R. Plomp,et al.  DETECTABILITY THRESHOLD FOR COMBINATION TONES. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Measurements of Basilar Membrane Tuning and Distortion with Laser Doppler Velocimetry , 1990 .

[23]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Cochlear action potential threshold and single unit thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  N. Cooper,et al.  Two-tone suppression in cochlear mechanics. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  G. Smoorenburg Pitch perception of two-frequency stimuli. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  S M Khanna,et al.  Specification of the acoustical input to the ear at high frequencies. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Guido F. Smoorenburg,et al.  Combination Tones and Their Origin , 1972 .

[30]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2f 1 - f 2 , 1968 .

[31]  Mario A. Ruggero,et al.  Two-tone distortion products in the basilar membrane of the chinchilla cochlea , 1990 .

[32]  Two‐tone suppression and combination‐tone driving , 1974 .

[33]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Ann M. Brown Distortion in the cochlea: Acoustic f 2−f 1 at low stimulus levels , 1993, Hearing Research.

[35]  J. Allen,et al.  A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.