Functional connectivity predicts changes in attention observed across minutes, days, and months

Significance Sustained attention varies across people and fluctuates over time. Patterns of functional brain connectivity predict a person’s overall sustained attention ability, but do they predict changes in attentional state? Here, across five studies, we show that the same functional connections that predict overall sustained attention ability predict attention changes observed over minutes, days, weeks, and months. Furthermore, these functional connections are sensitive to cognitive and attentional state changes induced by anesthesia. Thus, fluctuations in the same functional connections that predict attention in part reflect fluctuations in attentional state. The ability to sustain attention differs across people and changes within a single person over time. Although recent work has demonstrated that patterns of functional brain connectivity predict individual differences in sustained attention, whether these same patterns capture fluctuations in attention within individuals remains unclear. Here, across five independent studies, we demonstrate that the sustained attention connectome-based predictive model (CPM), a validated model of sustained attention function, generalizes to predict attentional state from data collected across minutes, days, weeks, and months. Furthermore, the sustained attention CPM is sensitive to within-subject state changes induced by propofol as well as sevoflurane, such that individuals show functional connectivity signatures of stronger attentional states when awake than when under deep sedation and light anesthesia. Together, these results demonstrate that fluctuations in attentional state reflect variability in the same functional connectivity patterns that predict individual differences in sustained attention.

[1]  Monica D. Rosenberg,et al.  Connectome-based models predict attentional control in aging adults , 2019, NeuroImage.

[2]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Unified Framework for Development, Deployment and Robust Testing of Neuroimaging Algorithms , 2011, Neuroinformatics.

[3]  David C. Jangraw,et al.  A functional connectivity-based neuromarker of sustained attention generalizes to predict recall in a reading task , 2018, NeuroImage.

[4]  M. Sigman,et al.  Signature of consciousness in the dynamics of resting-state brain activity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Amin Karbasi,et al.  There is no single functional atlas even for a single individual: Functional parcel definitions change with task , 2019, NeuroImage.

[6]  M. Esterman,et al.  Spontaneous default network activity reflects behavioral variability independent of mind-wandering , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  John C. Nash,et al.  Unifying Optimization Algorithms to Aid Software System Users: optimx for R , 2011 .

[8]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  The dynamic functional connectome: State-of-the-art and perspectives , 2017, NeuroImage.

[9]  K. Christoff,et al.  Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Predicting moment-to-moment attentional state , 2014, NeuroImage.

[11]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Building a Science of Individual Differences from fMRI , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Distributed Patterns of Functional Connectivity Predict Working Memory Performance in Novel Healthy and Memory-impaired Individuals , 2020, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Prediction complements explanation in understanding the developing brain , 2018, Nature Communications.

[14]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Circos: an information aesthetic for comparative genomics. , 2009, Genome research.

[15]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[16]  Sanjay S. Patel,et al.  Sevoflurane , 1996, Drugs.

[17]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  A Limited Memory Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization , 1995, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[18]  Sheng Zhang,et al.  Methylphenidate Modulates Functional Network Connectivity to Enhance Attention , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[20]  Chandra Sripada,et al.  Growth Charting of Brain Connectivity Networks and the Identification of Attention Impairment in Youth. , 2016, JAMA psychiatry.

[21]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Mind-Wandering With and Without Intention , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Andrew B Leber,et al.  Neural Predictors of Within-Subject Fluctuations in Attentional Control , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  V. Calhoun,et al.  The Chronnectome: Time-Varying Connectivity Networks as the Next Frontier in fMRI Data Discovery , 2014, Neuron.

[24]  Michael J. Hove,et al.  Dynamic Brain Network Correlates of Spontaneous Fluctuations in Attention , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  The Dynamics of Functional Brain Networks: Integrated Network States during Cognitive Task Performance , 2015, Neuron.

[26]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Just a thought: How mind-wandering is represented in dynamic brain connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.

[27]  M. Chun,et al.  A neuromarker of sustained attention from whole-brain functional connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Greicius,et al.  Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Connectome-based predictive modeling of attention: Comparing different functional connectivity features and prediction methods across datasets , 2018, NeuroImage.

[30]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Influences on the Test–Retest Reliability of Functional Connectivity MRI and its Relationship with Behavioral Utility , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Laura C. Buchanan,et al.  Tracking ongoing cognition in individuals using brief, whole-brain functional connectivity patterns , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[33]  M. Raichle,et al.  Cortical network functional connectivity in the descent to sleep , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[35]  Damien A. Fair,et al.  Connectotyping: Model Based Fingerprinting of the Functional Connectome , 2014, PloS one.

[36]  Amy L. Daitch,et al.  Electrophysiological dynamics of antagonistic brain networks reflect attentional fluctuations , 2020, Nature Communications.

[37]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Temporal metastates are associated with differential patterns of time-resolved connectivity, network topology, and attention , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[39]  Saori C. Tanaka,et al.  A prediction model of working memory across health and psychiatric disease using whole-brain functional connectivity , 2017, bioRxiv.

[40]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming , 2014, NeuroImage.

[41]  Christian J. Fiebach,et al.  Distributed patterns of occipito-parietal functional connectivity predict the precision of visual working memory , 2017, NeuroImage.

[42]  Hao-Ting Wang,et al.  The ebb and flow of attention: Between-subject variation in intrinsic connectivity and cognition associated with the dynamics of ongoing experience , 2019, NeuroImage.

[43]  M. Rosenberg,et al.  In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Kristina M. Visscher,et al.  The neural bases of momentary lapses in attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  David Rothlein,et al.  Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention: A robust replication and extension , 2018, NeuroImage.

[46]  G. Biggio,et al.  Propofol in anesthesia. Mechanism of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug delivery. , 2000, Current medicinal chemistry.

[47]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Questions and controversies in the study of time-varying functional connectivity in resting fMRI , 2020, Network Neuroscience.

[49]  R. Todd Constable,et al.  Functional connectivity and alterations in baseline brain state in humans , 2010, NeuroImage.

[50]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Improved state change estimation in dynamic functional connectivity using hidden semi-Markov models , 2019, NeuroImage.

[51]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Connectome-based Models Predict Separable Components of Attention in Novel Individuals , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[53]  R. T. Constable,et al.  Characterizing Attention with Predictive Network Models , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[54]  Vincent Frouin,et al.  Neural circuitry underlying sustained attention in healthy adolescents and in ADHD symptomatology , 2018, NeuroImage.

[55]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Task-induced brain state manipulation improves prediction of individual traits , 2018, Nature Communications.

[56]  M. Esterman,et al.  Models of sustained attention. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[57]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Multi-modal analysis of functional connectivity and cerebral blood flow reveals shared and unique effects of propofol in large-scale brain networks , 2017, NeuroImage.

[58]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  On the Stability of BOLD fMRI Correlations , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[59]  D. Salat,et al.  Intrinsic functional connectivity predicts individual differences in distractibility , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Sustaining visual attention in the face of distraction: a novel gradual-onset continuous performance task , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[61]  Michael Esterman,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations in Sustained Attention and Distractor Processing , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  Tamara Vanderwal,et al.  Inscapes: A movie paradigm to improve compliance in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2015, NeuroImage.

[63]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation , 2018, Neuron.

[64]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Task-based dynamic functional connectivity: Recent findings and open questions , 2017, NeuroImage.

[65]  Christos Davatzikos,et al.  Benchmarking of participant-level confound regression strategies for the control of motion artifact in studies of functional connectivity , 2017, NeuroImage.