An Evidence Based Methodology to Facilitate Public Library Non-fiction Collection Development

Abstract Objective – This research was designed as a pilot study to test a methodology for subject based collection analysis for public libraries. Methods – WorldCat collection data from eight Australian public libraries was extracted using the Collection Evaluation application. The data was aggregated and filtered to assess how the sample’s titles could be compared against the OCLC Conspectus subject categories. A hierarchy of emphasis emerged and this was divided into tiers ranging from 1% of the sample. These tiers were further analysed to quantify their representativeness against both the sample’s titles and the subject categories taken as a whole. The interpretive aspect of the study sought to understand the types of knowledge embedded in the tiers and was underpinned by hermeneutic phenomenology. Results – The study revealed that there was a marked tendency for a small percentage of subject categories to constitute a large proportion of the potential topicality that might have been represented in these types of collections. The study also found that distribution of the aggregated collection conformed to a Power Law distribution (80/20) so that approximately 80% of the collection was represented by 20% of the subject categories. The study also found that there were significant commonalities in the types of subject categories that were found in the designated tiers and that it may be possible to develop ontologies that correspond to the collection tiers. Conclusions – The evidence-based methodology developed in this pilot study has the potential for further development to help to improve the practice of collection development. The introduction of the concept of the epistemic role played by collection tiers is a promising aid to inform our understanding of knowledge organization for public libraries. The research shows a way forward to help to link subjective decision making with a scientifically based approach to managing knowledge resources.

[1]  Ron Gilmour,et al.  Assessing collections using brief tests and WorldCat Collection Analysis , 2007 .

[2]  F. W. Lancaster,et al.  Looking at a Collection in Different Ways: A Comparison of Methods of Bibliographic Checking , 1990 .

[3]  J. Shera.  Foundations of a Theory of Bibliography , 1952, The Library Quarterly.

[4]  Elaine Svenonius,et al.  The Epistemological Foundations of Knowledge Representations , 2004, Libr. Trends.

[5]  D. Mitchell,et al.  The Sociology of Knowledge: An Essay in Aid of a Deeper Understanding of the History of Ideas , 1959 .

[6]  N. Kafle,et al.  Hermeneutic phenomenological research method simplified , 2013 .

[7]  D. Fallis.  Social epistemology and information science , 2006 .

[8]  Paul Genoni,et al.  Assessing the collective wealth of Australian research libraries: measuring overlap using WorldCat Collection Analysis , 2010 .

[9]  Christine S. Bruce,et al.  Phenomenography : opening a new territory for library and information science research , 1999 .

[10]  Matthew Kelly,et al.  Collection Development Policies in Public Libraries in Australia: A Qualitative Content Analysis , 2015, Public Libr. Q..

[11]  H. Stephen McMinn.  Evaluation of Motor Vehicles, Aeronautics, Astronautics Collections Using White's Power Method of Collection Analysis , 2010 .

[12]  R. Bernstein.  Beyond objectivism and relativism , 1983 .

[13]  John M. Budd,et al.  Phenomenology and information studies , 2005, J. Documentation.

[14]  Derek de Solla Price,et al.  A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes , 1976, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Thomas M. Twiss.  A Validation of Brief Tests of Collection Strength , 2001 .

[16]  Reijo Savolainen.  Everyday Information Practices: A Social Phenomenological Perspective , 2008 .

[17]  John M. Budd,et al.  Self-Examination: The Present and Future of Librarianship , 2007 .

[18]  John M. Budd,et al.  Knowledge and Knowing in Library and Information Science: A Philosophical Framework , 2001 .

[20]  Jay H. Bernstein,et al.  From the Ubiquitous to the Nonexistent: A Demographic Study of OCLC WorldCat , 2006 .

[21]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[22]  Allen W. Wood,et al.  Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory , 1986 .

[23]  Howard D. White.  Better Than Brief Tests: Coverage Power Tests of Collection Strength , 2008 .

[24]  Howard D. White.  Brief Tests of Collection Strength: A Methodology for All Types of Libraries , 1995 .

[25]  P. Wilson.  Two kinds of power : an essay on bibliographical control , 1978 .

[26]  Raymond Williams.  Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society , 1976 .

[27]  M. Carl Drott,et al.  Bradford's Law: Theory, Empiricism and the Gaps Between , 1981 .

[28]  Joacim Hansson,et al.  Hermeneutics as a bridge between the modern and the postmodern in library and information science , 2005, J. Documentation.

[29]  Lea Currie,et al.  Using the WorldCat Collection Analysis Tool: Experiences From the University of Kansas Libraries , 2011 .

[30]  K. Mannheim,et al.  Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge , 1953 .

[31]  Amy VanScoy,et al.  Interpretative phenomenological analysis for LIS research , 2015, J. Documentation.

[32]  Max Scheler,et al.  Problems of a Sociology of Knowledge , 1968 .

[33]  K. Jensen.  Data-Driven Decisions for Library Liaisons: Exploring Strategies for Effectively Managing Diminishing Monograph Collections , 2012 .

[34]  Richard J. Bernstein,et al.  Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis , 1984 .

[35]  M. Kelly.  The Materials-Centred Approach to Public Library Collection Development: A Defense , 2015 .

[36]  Lynn Silipigni Connaway,et al.  Estimating the audience level for library resources , 2008 .

[37]  R. Rorty,et al.  Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. , 1980 .

[38]  Brian Lavoie,et al.  Mapping WorldCat's Digital Landscape , 2007 .

[39]  C B Osburn,et al.  Some practical observations on the writing, implementation, and revision of collection development policy. , 1979, Library resources & technical services.

[40]  Charles B. Osburn.  Collection Evaluation: A Reconsideration , 2005 .

[41]  Daniel Benediktsson,et al.  Hermeneutics: dimensions toward LIS thinking , 1989 .

[42]  Anna H. Perrault.  The Role of WorldCat in Resources Sharing , 2004 .

[43]  Robert Stephens,et al.  Sociable knowledge sharing online: philosophy, patterns and intervention , 2010, Aslib Proc..

[44]  B. Wootton.  Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. By Karl Mannheim. Edited by Paul Kecskemeti. (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1952. Price 25s.) , 1953, Philosophy.

[45]  Susan Hekman,et al.  Hermeneutics and the Sociology of Knowledge , 1988 .

[46]  Robert A. Fairthorne.  Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction , 1969 .

[47]  Matthew Kelly.  Assessing the relative value of domain knowledge for civil society's libraries: the role of core collections. , 2014 .