State of evidence on the relationship between high-volume hospitals and outcomes in surgery: a systematic review of systematic reviews.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Dawid Pieper | Tim Mathes | Michaela Eikermann | Edmund Neugebauer | D. Pieper | M. Eikermann | E. Neugebauer | T. Mathes
[1] B. Hamilton,et al. Does practice make perfect? Examining the relationship between hospital surgical volume and outcomes for hip fracture patients in Quebec. , 1998, Medical care.
[2] J. Feinglass,et al. Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[3] M W Gillman,et al. Interpretation of observational studies , 2004, Heart.
[4] Jacobus Pfisterer,et al. Variations in institutional infrastructure, physician specialization and experience, and outcome in ovarian cancer: a systematic review. , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.
[5] Matthew J. Thompson,et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome following carotid endarterectomy. , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.
[6] E. Hannan,et al. Using Medicare claims data to assess provider quality for CABG surgery: does it work well enough? , 1997, Health services research.
[7] G. Maddern,et al. Centralization and the relationship between volume and outcome in knee arthroplasty procedures , 2010, ANZ journal of surgery.
[8] M. Clarke,et al. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions , 2011, BMC medical research methodology.
[9] C. G. Hayden. Blue Cross–Blue Shield , 1950 .
[10] T A Sheldon,et al. Volume and outcome in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: true association or artefact? , 1995, BMJ.
[11] E. Klar,et al. Volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery: the situation in Germany. , 2012, Surgery.
[12] J. V. van Sandick,et al. The volume‐outcome relation in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer , 2012, Cancer.
[13] Arya M. Sharma,et al. Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Clinical and Economic Evidence , 2011, Journal of General Internal Medicine.
[14] B. Hillner,et al. Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[15] M. Koelemay,et al. Meta analysis on mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2008, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.
[16] D. Gouma,et al. Hospital Volume and Mortality After Pancreatic Resection: A Systematic Review and an Evaluation of Intervention in The Netherlands , 2005, Annals of surgery.
[17] M. Koch,et al. Impact of Volume and Specialization for Cancer Surgery , 2004, Digestive Surgery.
[18] Jeremy Grimshaw,et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[19] A. Karthikesalingam,et al. The Impact of Hospital and Surgeon Volume on Clinical Outcome Following Bariatric Surgery , 2012, Obesity Surgery.
[20] M. Zinner. The Volume-Outcome Relationship: Don’t Believe Everything You See , 2006, World Journal of Surgery.
[21] V. Ho,et al. Evolution of the volume-outcome relation for hospitals performing coronary angioplasty. , 2000, Circulation.
[22] L. Hedges,et al. Vote Counting – A New Name for an Old Problem , 2009, Introduction to Meta‐Analysis.
[23] A. Pierro,et al. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome , 2007, The British journal of surgery.
[24] A. Darzi,et al. Assessing the quality of the volume‐outcome relationship in uro‐oncology , 2009, BJU international.
[25] Justin B Dimick,et al. Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. , 2004, Surgery.
[26] Sam S. Chang,et al. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes of radical prostatectomy. , 2010, Urologic oncology.
[27] Jani Ruotsalainen,et al. Synthesizing study results in a systematic review. , 2012, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.
[28] A. Karthikesalingam,et al. Volume-Outcome Relationships in Vascular Surgery: The Current Status , 2010, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.
[29] H. Meyer. The influence of case load and the extent of resection on the quality of treatment outcome in gastric cancer. , 2005, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[30] R. Blamey,et al. EUSOMA accreditation of breast units. , 2006, European journal of cancer.
[31] Ulrich Glitsch,et al. Epidemiological Evidence for Work Load as a Risk Factor for Osteoarthritis of the Hip: A Systematic Review , 2012, PloS one.
[32] H. Dickinson,et al. Centralisation of services for gynaecological cancer. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[33] E. Livingston,et al. When policy meets statistics: the very real effect that questionable statistical analysis has on limiting health care access for bariatric surgery. , 2007, Archives of surgery.
[34] R. Sandler,et al. The effect of hospital and surgeon volume on outcomes for rectal cancer surgery. , 2008, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.
[35] J. Brisson,et al. Provider’s volume and quality of breast cancer detection and treatment , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[36] Kara E MacLeod,et al. Variation in esophagectomy outcomes in hospitals meeting Leapfrog volume outcome standards. , 2011, The Annals of thoracic surgery.
[37] P. Post,et al. The relation between volume and outcome of coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, European heart journal.
[38] A. Booth,et al. REVIEW ARTICLE: Is there a Positive Volume–Outcome Relationship in Peripheral Vascular Surgery? Results of a Systematic Review , 2000 .
[39] S. Carr,et al. Influence of experience, case load, and stage distribution on outcome of endoscopic laser surgery for TTTS—a review , 2010, Prenatal diagnosis.
[40] William Wijns,et al. Experience with revascularization procedures does matter: low volume means worse outcome. , 2010, European heart journal.
[41] T. Rath,et al. Mindestmengen in der Hüftgelenksendoprothetik bei Coxarthrose und Schenkelhalsfraktur - Evidenzbericht und Modellrechnung zur Auswirkung auf die flächendeckende Versorgung , 2007 .
[42] A. Enthoven,et al. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.
[43] Robert L Kane,et al. Comparison of endovascular and open surgical repairs for abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2006, Evidence report/technology assessment.
[44] C. V. D. van de Velde,et al. Surgical quality assurance in rectal cancer treatment: the key to improved outcome. , 2005, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[45] C. Ohmann,et al. Two short-term outcomes after instituting a national regulation regarding minimum procedural volumes for total knee replacement. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[46] D. Gillatt,et al. A systematic review and critique of the literature relating hospital or surgeon volume to health outcomes for 3 urological cancer procedures. , 2004, The Journal of urology.
[47] P. Baker,et al. Does surgical volume affect outcome after primary and revision knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of the literature. , 2012, The Knee.
[48] A. Ekkernkamp,et al. Ein Rapid Review zur Mindestmengenproblematik am Beispiel der Knietotalendoprothese , 2004, Der Unfallchirurg.
[49] A D Oxman,et al. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.
[50] P. Post,et al. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery , 2011, The British journal of surgery.
[51] B. Konety,et al. The impact of provider volume on outcomes from urological cancer therapy. , 2005, The Journal of urology.
[52] Therese A. Stukel,et al. Hospital Volume and Late Survival After Cancer Surgery , 2007, Annals of surgery.
[53] H. Harling,et al. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short‐term outcome , 2007, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
[54] A. Laupacis,et al. Varied definitions of hospital volume did not alter the conclusions of volume-outcome analyses. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[55] R. V. van Klaveren,et al. Prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer surgery. , 2006, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[56] C. Lawton. Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Radical Prostatectomy Volume and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review , 2009 .
[57] D. Jolley,et al. The Effect of Provider Case Volume on Cancer Mortality: Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2009, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[58] [Volume and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews]. , 2005, Epidemiologia e prevenzione.
[59] A. Karthikesalingam,et al. Provider volume and long‐term outcome after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair , 2012, The British journal of surgery.
[60] J. Stockman. How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis , 2009 .
[61] A. Hölscher,et al. High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality? , 2004, Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.
[62] Afschin Gandjour,et al. Threshold Volumes Associated With Higher Survival in Health Care: A Systematic Review , 2003, Medical care.
[63] G. Maddern,et al. Effect of hospital and surgeon volume on patient outcomes following treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a systematic review. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.
[64] J. Birkmeyer,et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.
[65] Helmut Küchenhoff,et al. Flexible regression models are useful tools to calculate and assess threshold values in the context of minimum provider volumes. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[66] M. Ravaioli,et al. Hospital Volume, Margin Status, and Long-Term Survival after Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma , 2012, The American surgeon.
[67] R. Glazier,et al. The association of hospital, clinic and provider volume with HIV/AIDS care and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, AIDS care.
[68] P. Post,et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between hospital/surgeon volume and outcome for radical cystectomy: an update for the ongoing debate. , 2011, European urology.
[69] P. Post,et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Are breast cancer patients better of with a high volume provider? , 2010, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[70] Youping Li,et al. The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[71] Ethan A Halm,et al. Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[72] Alexander Tsertsvadze,et al. A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[73] R. Glazier,et al. Provider training and experience for people living with HIV/AIDS , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[74] D. J. Gouma,et al. Centralisatie van pancreasoperaties: een systematische review en evaluatie in Nederland* , 2006 .
[75] H. Luft. The Relation Between Surgical Volume and Mortality: An Exploration of Causal Factors and Alternative Models , 1980, Medical care.
[76] S. Paterson-Brown. Surgical volume and clinical outcome , 2007, The British journal of surgery.
[77] Matthew J. Thompson,et al. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome for lower limb arterial surgery , 2010, The British journal of surgery.
[78] W. Kirwan,et al. Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures , 2005, The British journal of surgery.
[79] H. Redmond,et al. Provider volume and outcomes for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, carotid endarterectomy, and lower extremity revascularization procedures. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.
[80] H. Harling,et al. Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence Part 2: Long‐term outcome , 2007, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
[81] Matthew J. Thompson,et al. Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005 , 2007, The British journal of surgery.
[82] M. Koelemay,et al. Relation between hospital volume and outcome of elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review. , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.
[83] S. Lowry,et al. The Impact of Hospital Volume on the Development of Infectious Complications After Elective Abdominal Aortic Surgery in the Medicare Population , 2011, Vascular and endovascular surgery.
[84] David Moher,et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews , 2007, BMC medical research methodology.
[85] O. D. Williams,et al. Quality of care versus provider volume: does one lead to the other? , 2003, Medical care.
[86] A Milstein,et al. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. , 2000, JAMA.
[87] Bruce Barraclough,et al. Systematic review of the impact of volume of oesophagectomy on patient outcome , 2009, ANZ journal of surgery.
[88] P. Wille-Jørgensen,et al. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[89] H. Klomp,et al. The Relationship Between Volume or Surgeon Specialty and Outcome in the Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2012, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.
[90] P. Post,et al. Volume and outcome in colorectal cancer surgery. , 2010, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.
[91] D. Hahnloser,et al. Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies , 2010, Patient safety in surgery.
[92] Matthew J. Thompson,et al. Meta‐analysis and systematic review of the relationship between volume and outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery , 2007, The British journal of surgery.
[93] L. Hedges,et al. Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.