Forced versus free traffic in an automated milking system

Abstract Cows in automated milking systems with free access to feeders sometimes show a reduced use of the robotic milkers, while forced traffic where cows have to pass through the robot to reach the feeders may reduce feeding time and frequency. We examined two groups of 35 lactating cows. For 21 d, one group had free access to feeders, while the other group had to pass through the robot to reach feed. For a subsequent 21 d period, the treatments were reversed. The behaviour of the cows was observed for 3 periods of 24 h using 10 min scan sampling. Milking data were obtained from the robot milkers. The average number of visits to the robot, either with or without milking, did not differ between the two types of traffic. On average cows lay down for 12.3 h/d, with no significant difference between free and forced traffic. The type of traffic did not affect the duration of time spent in the feeding area. With both forced and free traffic, there was marked diurnal variation in feeding, with relatively little feeding occurring between 2200 h and 0800 h. Use of forced traffic did not reduce feeding time. It did not improve access to the robot milker or eliminate diurnal variation. Differences between cows in visits to the robot may reflect differences in their motivation to rest and eat concentrates.

[1]  A. H. Ipema,et al.  Dairy cow interactions with an automatic milking system starting with `walk-through' selection , 1999 .

[2]  S. Chaplin.  Resting behaviour of dairy cows: applications to farm assurance and welfare , 2000 .

[3]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Analysis of milking behaviour on automatic milking. , 2000 .

[4]  J. Hillerton,et al.  Behaviour associated with feeding and milking of early lactation cows housed in an experimental automatic milking system , 1995 .

[5]  A. H. Ipema,et al.  Integration of robotic milking in dairy housing systems : Review of cow traffic and milking capacity aspects , 1997 .

[6]  C. C. Ketelaar-De Lauwere,et al.  Cow behaviour and managerial aspects of fully automatic milking in loose housing systems , 1999 .

[7]  H. Hogeveen,et al.  Results from the implementation of automatic milking system (AMS) - multi-box facilities. , 2000 .

[8]  J. Mclean,et al.  Influence of cow traffic on milking and animal behaviour in a robotic milking system. , 2002 .

[9]  T. T. Mottram,et al.  Relative motivations of dairy cows to be milked or fed in a Y-maze and an automatic milking system , 1998 .

[10]  A. Meijering,et al.  The milking process in an automatic milking system, evaluation of milk yield, teat condition and udder health. , 2000 .

[11]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Maximising the milking capacity of an automatic milking system. , 2000 .

[12]  A. Meijering,et al.  Automatic milking experience and development in Europe. , 2002 .

[13]  A. H. Ipema,et al.  The effect of two traffic situations on the behavior and performance of cows in an automatic milking system. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  M. Sinclair,et al.  Barn layout and cow traffic to optimise the capacity of an automatic milking system. , 2002 .

[15]  Henk Hogeveen,et al.  Milking interval, milk production and milk flow-rate in an automatic milking system , 2001 .

[16]  J. McLean,et al.  Culling strategies in herds with automatic milking systems analysed by stochastic simulation. , 2002 .

[17]  R. W. Palmer,et al.  Feeding behavior, milking behavior, and milk yields of cows milked in a parlor versus an automatic milking system. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  A. H. Ipema,et al.  The behaviour of dairy cows in an automatic milking system where selection for milking takes place in the milking stalls , 1999 .

[19]  A. H. Ipema,et al.  Cow behaviour under different types of cow traffic , 2000 .

[20]  J. Rodenburg,et al.  Strategies for incorporating robotic milking into North American herd management. , 2002 .

[21]  M. Mendl,et al.  Proceedings of the 35th International Congress of the ISAE , 2001 .