Sustainable land use scenario framework: Framework and outcomes from peri-urban South-East Queensland, Australia

Scenario planning is a common tool used for dealing with uncertainty in rapidly changing situations. The aim of this paper is to create a practical framework for developing sustainable land use scenarios that has direct policy relevance. The framework was created and tested in a peri-urban area, Rocky Point in South-East Queensland, Australia. The framework, which is driven by participatory processes and consists of an iterative combination of three steps: context assessment, decision structuring and decision analysis. The participatory process involved a range of actors engaged through steering committees, public meetings, focus groups, questionnaires and interviews. The outputs from these activities were four landscape scale scenarios which were sustainably assessed by an impact matrix and equity matrix (relating to a dendrogram of coalition). Critically, these outputs also identified the possible formation of three new social alliances amongst key local actors considered necessary for the manifestation of any of the future scenarios. Application of this framework demonstrated its usefulness to inform policy by outcomes already being included in current policy documents. Additionally, the framework will inform future scenario developers by including: (i) a flexible participatory process able to respond to local contextual needs; (ii) capability to identify ‘triggers for change’ by actors to delineate alternate scenarios; and (iii) development of ‘enabling policies’ as part of the participatory process, to move towards target scenarios.

[1]  J. Holmes Diversity and change in Australia’s rangelands: a post–productivist transition with a difference? , 2002 .

[2]  Z. Naveh Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes , 2001 .

[3]  Catherine Allan,et al.  Learning to implement adaptive management , 2003 .

[4]  G. Munda Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies , 2006 .

[5]  Andre Botequilha Leitão,et al.  Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning , 2002 .

[6]  Csiro. Sustainable Ecosystems.,et al.  Natural values: Exploring options for enhancing ecosystem services in the Goulburn Broken Catchment , 2003 .

[7]  G. Gamboa Social multi-criteria evaluation of different development scenarios of the Aysén region, Chile , 2006 .

[8]  Shahab Fazal The need for preserving farmland: A case study from a predominantly agrarian economy (India) , 2001 .

[9]  D. Bengston,et al.  An analysis of the public discourse about urban sprawl in the United States: Monitoring concern about a major threat to forests , 2005 .

[10]  David S. G. Thomas The Edge of the City , 1990 .

[11]  G. Munda Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: Theory and Applications in Ecological Economics , 1995 .

[12]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling , 2007 .

[13]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Erin Bohensky,et al.  Young Scholars Dialogue, part of a Special Feature on Scenarios of global ecosystem services Linking Futures across Scales: a Dialog on Multiscale Scenarios , 2007 .

[15]  S. Bekessy,et al.  Change and continuity in peri-urban Australia, state of the peri-urban regions: a review of the literature , 2006 .

[16]  F. Luz Participatory landscape ecology: A basis for acceptance and implementation , 2000 .

[17]  J. Holmes,et al.  Impulses towards a Multifunctional Transition in Rural Australia: Gaps in the Research Agenda. , 2006 .

[18]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[19]  A. Tsoar,et al.  Landscape continuity analysis: A new approach to conservation planning in Israel , 2007 .

[20]  A. Jacquin,et al.  A hybrid object-based classification approach for mapping urban sprawl in periurban environment , 2008 .

[21]  R. DeFries,et al.  Anthropogenic Drivers of Ecosystem Change: an Overview , 2006 .

[22]  I. Bohnet,et al.  Landscape dynamics in Germany , 2000 .

[23]  Neil Barr,et al.  Future agricultural landscapes , 2003 .

[24]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes , 2006 .

[25]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  P. Selman Planning at the Landscape Scale , 2006 .

[27]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Beyond Greenbelts and Zoning: A New Planning Concept for the Environment of Asian Mega-Cities , 2000 .

[28]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview , 2006 .

[29]  Iris C. Bohnet,et al.  Planning future landscapes in the Wet Tropics of Australia: A social-ecological framework , 2007 .

[30]  A. Allen Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field , 2003 .

[31]  I. Bohnet Assessing retrospective and prospective landscape change through the development of social profiles of landholders: a tool for improving land use planning and policy formulation , 2008 .

[32]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs , 1976 .

[33]  Séverine Vuilleumier,et al.  Map of ecological networks for landscape planning , 2002 .

[34]  R. Lathrop,et al.  Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl , 2003 .

[35]  M. Tonts,et al.  Containing Urban Sprawl: Trends in Land Use and Spatial Planning in the Metropolitan Region of Barcelona , 2005 .

[36]  H. Wittmer,et al.  How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts , 2006 .