Research methods in library and information science: A content analysis

Abstract A total of 1162 research articles, published from 2001 to 2010 in three major journals of library and information science (LIS), are analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively in order to address some recurring themes about research method selection and application in the scholarly domain. This study shows that LIS scholars utilize a greater number and wider variety of research methods than before. Replacing the dominant positions that questionnaire survey and historical method previously held, content analysis, experiment, and theoretical approach have become the top choices of research methods in the field. This study also examines two recurring themes regarding research methods in the LIS field, namely, use of multiple methods in one study and adoption of the qualitative approach, but finds no conclusive evidence of increased implementation of either practice. More efforts in the form of education, training and advocacy are therefore needed to help LIS scholars gain a better understanding of research methods and make more informed decisions on research method selection and implementation in their scholarly endeavors.

[1]  Soyeon Park,et al.  The study of research methods in LIS education: issues in Korean and U.S. universities , 2004 .

[2]  Jonathan D Eldredge,et al.  Inventory of research methods for librarianship and informatics. , 2004, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[3]  Kathy B. Enger,et al.  Statistical Methods Used by Authors of Library and Information Science Journal Articles, by Enger KB, Quirk G, Stewart JA , 1989 .

[4]  Virgil L. P. Blake Since shaughnessy: research methods in library and information science dissertations, 1975-1989 , 1994 .

[5]  Bluma C. Peritz,et al.  The Methods of Library Science Research: Some Results from a Bibliometric Survey. , 1980 .

[6]  P M Smith,et al.  The Future of the Behavioral and Social Sciences , 1996, Science.

[7]  Petra Kaufmann,et al.  Experimental And Quasi Experimental Designs For Research , 2016 .

[8]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[9]  Mary Ellen Soper,et al.  The librarian's thesaurus , 1990 .

[10]  R. Fidel Are we there yet?: Mixed methods research in library and information science , 2008 .

[11]  R. Fidel Qualitative methods in information retrieval research. , 1993 .

[12]  Paulette Bernhard,et al.  In Search Of. . . Research Methods Used in Information Science , 2013 .

[13]  Philip Hider,et al.  Empirical research methods reported in high-profile LIS journal literature , 2008 .

[14]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Content Analysis of Research Articles in Library and Information Science. , 1990 .

[15]  Mary Sue Stephenson The "Canadian Library Journal," 1981-91: An Analysis. , 1993 .

[16]  Ronald R. Powell,et al.  Recent trends in research: A methodological essay , 1999 .

[17]  Prakash Chand,et al.  Library and information science research in India: A bibliometric study , 2006 .

[18]  S. Kumpulainen,et al.  Library and Information Science Research in 1975: Content Analysis of the Journal Articles , 1991 .

[19]  이명희 내용분석법에 의한 문헌정보학 학술지 연구논문 분석 , 2002 .

[20]  Lai Ma,et al.  Some philosophical considerations in using mixed methods in library and information science research , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..