Anatomy Learning with Virtual Objects

In 3 experiments, participants learned bone anatomy by using a hand-held controller to rotate an on-screen 3D bone model. The on-screen bone included (OR condition) or did not include (no-OR condition) orientation references—visible lines marking its axes. The learning task involved rotating the on-screen bone to match target orientations. Learning outcomes were assessed by having participants identify anatomical features from different orientations. On the learning task, the OR group performed more accurately, directly, and quickly than the control group and high-spatial individuals outperformed low-spatial individuals. Assessments of anatomy learning indicated that under more challenging conditions, ORs elevated learning by low-spatial individuals to near that of high-spatial individuals. In Experiment 3, orientation references were shown to help learners avoid disorientation due to the symmetrical shape of the object.

[1]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[2]  Colin Ware,et al.  Evaluating stereo and motion cues for visualizing information nets in three dimensions , 1996, TOGS.

[3]  R. Shepard,et al.  Comparison of cube rotations around axes inclined relative to the environment or to the cube. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  S. Daniel,et al.  Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer‐generated three‐dimensional anatomical ear model , 2006, Medical education.

[5]  Kevin W Eva,et al.  Is There Any Real Virtue of Virtual Reality?: The Minor Role of Multiple Orientations in Learning Anatomy from Computers , 2002, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[6]  L. Parsons.  Inability to Reason About an Object's Orientation Using an Axis and Angle of Rotation , 1995 .

[7]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Mental and manual rotation. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Routes to Object Constancy: Implications from Neurological Impairments of Object Constancy , 1984, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Visual perception : essential readings , 2000 .

[11]  K. Rochford.  Spatial learning disabilities and underachievement among university anatomy students , 1985, Medical education.

[12]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[13]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Individual differences in use of external visualisations to perform an internal visualisation task. , 2007 .

[14]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  Features, objects, action: The cognitive neuropsychology of visual object processing, 1984–2004 , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[16]  M. Corballis.  Recognition of disoriented shapes. , 1988, Psychological review.

[17]  M. Bearman.  Is Virtual the Same as Real? Medical Students' Experiences of a Virtual Patient , 2003, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  Jeff Rose,et al.  Rotating virtual objects with real handles , 1999, TCHI.

[19]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Getting a Handle on Learning Anatomy with Interactive Three-Dimensional Graphics , 2009 .

[20]  R. Ruddle,et al.  Manual and virtual rotation of a three-dimensional object. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[21]  M. Goodale,et al.  Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: where the action is. , 2001, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[22]  Markus Graf,et al.  Coordinate transformations in object recognition. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  R. Reznick,et al.  Teaching surgical skills--changes in the wind. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  J. Pani.  Limits on the Comprehension of Rotational Motion: Mental Imagery of Rotations with Oblique Components , 1993, Perception.

[25]  Andrew T. Stull,et al.  Anatomy learning in virtual reality: A cognitive investigation , 2009 .

[26]  David G. Marr,et al.  The Philosophy and the Approach , 2010 .