Communication constraints, indexical countermeasures, and crew configuration effects in simulated space-dwelling groups

Abstract Previous research with groups of individually isolated crews communicating and problem-solving in a distributed interactive simulation environment has shown that the functional interchangeability of available communication channels can serve as an effective countermeasure to communication constraints. The present report extends these findings by investigating crew performance effects and psychosocial adaptation following: (1) the loss of all communication channels, and (2) changes in crew configuration. Three-person crews participated in a simulated planetary exploration mission that required identification, collection, and analysis of geologic samples. Results showed that crews developed and employed discrete navigation system operations that served as functionally effective communication signals (i.e., “indexical” or “deictic” cues) in generating appropriate crewmember responses and maintaining performance effectiveness in the absence of normal communication channels. Additionally, changes in crew configuration impacted both performance effectiveness and psychosocial adaptation.

[1]  M. Owren,et al.  Classification of domestic cat (Felis catus) vocalizations by naive and experienced human listeners. , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[2]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning , 2000 .

[3]  David A. Leavens,et al.  Indexical and referential pointing in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1996, Journal of comparative psychology.

[4]  J. Hackman.  Why Teams Don’t Work , 1998 .

[5]  Arthur M. Glenberg,et al.  Indexical understanding of instructions , 1999 .

[6]  R D Hienz,et al.  Distributed communication and psychosocial performance in simulated space dwelling groups. , 2005, Acta astronautica.

[7]  J. McGrath.  Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. , 1997 .

[8]  David R. Pratt,et al.  Humans in Large-scale, Networked Virtual Environments , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[9]  J. Brady,et al.  Behavioral health: the propaedeutic requirement. , 2005, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[10]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[11]  M W Fischman,et al.  Performance-based testing for drugs of abuse: dose and time profiles of marijuana, amphetamine, alcohol, and diazepam. , 1993, Journal of analytical toxicology.

[12]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[13]  R. Dupont.  Handbook On Drug Abuse. , 1979 .

[14]  C. H. Evans,et al.  Safe passage : astronaut care for exploration missions , 2001 .

[15]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[16]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[17]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[18]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision making , 1988, CSUR.

[19]  Steven R. Hursh,et al.  Distributed interactive communication in simulated space-dwelling groups , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  D. Rendall,et al.  Sound on the rebound: Bringing form and function back to the forefront in understanding nonhuman primate vocal signaling , 2001 .