Monitoring and assessment of surface water quality in Taquari-Antas Watershed, South Brazil—region with intensive pig farming

Pig farming is one of the human activities carried out to meet the increasing food demand by the increasing population. South Brazil is the region with most intensive pig farming in the country, exerting pressure on the water and soil environments by the relevant pollutant emissions. Therefore, the main objective of this work was to assess pig farming pollution by monitoring superficial water qualities of the Taquari-Antas Watershed in South Brazil. The study area is about 8062 km2 (south latitude 292,614, 282,624 and west longitude 520,802, 504,554). In 2014, there were 861 pig farmers and 739,858 animals were slaughtered. Samples were collected bimonthly from 13 spots during 2 years of monitoring. The main analysis included the determination of the water quality index (WQI)—a nine physicochemical and microbiological parameter index—and the trophic state index (TSI), which gives a trophic degree based on phosphorous and chlorophyll-α concentration to assess the impacts of the pig farming on superficial water of the region. The results suggest that the regions with high concentration of finishing stage farms present a higher risk to water quality. A distance of 4 km between different spots was enough to detect a significant decrease in the WQI. The WQI was found ranging from “regular” to “good” (62.77 and 78.95). The TSI were found to be mesotrophic at every spot during the entire period of the study.

[1]  Nilay Shah,et al.  Contrasting perspectives on China's rare earths policies: Reframing the debate through a stakeholder lens , 2013 .

[2]  D. Lapworth,et al.  Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater: A review of sources, fate and occurrence. , 2012, Environmental pollution.

[3]  M. Deshusses,et al.  Nitrification of anaerobic digester effluent for nitrogen management at swine farms. , 2014, Chemosphere.

[4]  Dilip Kumar Jha,et al.  Water quality assessment using water quality index and geographical information system methods in the coastal waters of Andaman Sea, India. , 2015, Marine pollution bulletin.

[5]  L. Pizzuti,et al.  Laminar burning velocity and flammability limits in biogas: A literature review , 2016 .

[6]  Xinmin Zhan,et al.  Economic analyses of pig manure treatment options in Ireland. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[7]  Patrick G Hunt,et al.  Removal of pathogen and indicator microorganisms from liquid swine manure in multi-step biological and chemical treatment. , 2005, Bioresource technology.

[8]  P. B. Filho,et al.  The water disappearance and manure production at commercial growing-finishing pig farms , 2014 .

[9]  B. Riaño,et al.  On-farm treatment of swine manure based on solid-liquid separation and biological nitrification-denitrification of the liquid fraction. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Jesus Martinez-Almela,et al.  SELCO-Ecopurin® pig slurry treatment system , 2004, Bioresource Technology.

[11]  R. Slade,et al.  Uncertainty in the availability of natural resources: Fossil fuels, critical metals and biomass , 2015 .

[12]  Shangping Xu,et al.  Manure as a Source of Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli and Enterococci: a Case Study of a Wisconsin, USA Family Dairy Farm , 2011 .

[13]  Marta Condé Lamparelli Graus de trofia em corpos d\'água do estado de São Paulo: avaliação dos métodos de monitoramento. , 2004 .

[14]  P. Sureshkumar,et al.  Water Quality Index of River Cauvery in Tiruchirappalli district, Tamilnadu , 2011 .

[15]  Verônica Schmidt,et al.  Perfil de resistência antimicrobiana de isolados de Escherichia coli obtidos de águas superficiais e subterrâneas, em área de produção de suínos , 2011 .

[16]  K. Toyota,et al.  Methane and N2O emissions, nitrate concentrations of drainage water, and zinc and copper uptake by rice fertilized with anaerobically digested cattle or pig slurry , 2011, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[17]  N. Willby,et al.  An assessment of the risk to surface water ecosystems of groundwater P in the UK and Ireland. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Joaquín Andreu,et al.  Managing water quality under drought conditions in the Llobregat River Basin. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  Suzelle Barrington,et al.  Livestock waste treatment systems for environmental quality, food safety, and sustainability. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[20]  C. Feng,et al.  Prevalence of Veterinary Antibiotics and Antibiotic-Resistant Escherichia coli in the Surface Water of a Livestock Production Region in Northern China , 2014, PloS one.

[21]  F. Mégraud,et al.  A large multi-pathogen waterborne community outbreak linked to faecal contamination of a groundwater system, France, 2000. , 2006, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[22]  Steven W. Running,et al.  Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050? , 2013 .

[23]  Jung-Jeng Su,et al.  Monitoring of sulfur dioxide emission resulting from biogas utilization on commercial pig farms in Taiwan , 2014, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[24]  S. Ivanova,et al.  Food security: The challenge of the present , 2018 .

[25]  D. Krcmar,et al.  Impact of wastewater from pig farm lagoons on the quality of local groundwater , 2014 .

[26]  G. Bonanno,et al.  Application of Two Quality Indices as Monitoring and Management Tools of Rivers. Case Study: The Imera Meridionale River, Italy , 2010, Environmental management.

[27]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of pork production: A data inventory for the case of Germany , 2013 .

[28]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[29]  Prerna Sharma,et al.  Changes in water quality index of Ganges river at different locations in Allahabad , 2014 .

[30]  Fabrice Béline,et al.  Challenges and innovations on biological treatment of livestock effluents. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[31]  Guilherme Marcelo Zanghelini,et al.  Life cycle assessment of swine production in Brazil: a comparison of four manure management systems , 2015 .

[32]  K. Rogers,et al.  Evidence of soil pollution by nitrates derived from pig effluent using 18O and 15N isotope analyses , 2010, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[33]  Sung-Chul Kim,et al.  Veterinary antibiotics contamination in water, sediment, and soil near a swine manure composting facility , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[34]  R. Gross,et al.  Materials availability for thin film (TF) PV technologies development: A real concern? , 2011 .

[35]  M. C. Uchegbu,et al.  Livestock waste and its impact on the environment , 2012 .

[36]  F. Olivé,et al.  Soil water and nitrate distribution under drip irrigated corn receiving pig slurry , 2013 .

[37]  Marcos von Sperling,et al.  Basic Principles Of Wastewater Treatment , 2007 .

[38]  S. Robinson,et al.  Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People , 2010, Science.

[39]  C. Barardi,et al.  Performance of two swine manure treatment systems on chemical composition and on the reduction of pathogens. , 2013, Chemosphere.

[40]  J. M. Morgan-Sagastume,et al.  Treatment of Biogas Produced in Anaerobic Reactors for Domestic Wastewater: Odor Control and Energy/Resource Recovery , 2006 .

[41]  Yuan Luo,et al.  Effects of mix ratio, moisture content and aeration rate on sulfur odor emissions during pig manure composting. , 2016, Waste management.