Multi-site incorporation of bioactive matrices into MEMS-based neural probes

Methods are presented to incorporate polymer-based bioactive matrices into micro-fabricated implantable microelectrode arrays. Using simple techniques, hydrogels infused with bioactive molecules are deposited within wells in the substrate of the device. This method allows local drug delivery without increasing the footprint of the device. In addition, each well can be loaded individually, allowing spatial and temporal control over diffusion gradients in the microenvironment of the implanted neural interface probe. In vivo testing verified the following: diffusion of the bioactive molecules, integration of the bioactive molecules with the intended neural target and concurrent extracellular recording using nearby electrodes. These results support the feasibility of using polymer gels to deliver bioactive molecules to the region close to microelectrode shanks. This technique for microdrug delivery may serve as a means to intervene with the initial phases of the neuroinflammatory tissue response to permanently implanted microelectrode arrays.

[1]  R A Bakay,et al.  Behavioral correlates of action potentials recorded chronically inside the Cone Electrode. , 1992, Neuroreport.

[2]  P. Kennedy The cone electrode: a long-term electrode that records from neurites grown onto its recording surface , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  S. Retterer,et al.  Controlling cellular reactive responses around neural prosthetic devices using peripheral and local intervention strategies , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Scott T. Retterer,et al.  Model neural prostheses with integrated microfluidics: a potential intervention strategy for controlling reactive cell and tissue responses , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  E. S. Kikkinides,et al.  A two-phase model for controlled drug release from biphasic polymer hydrogels. , 1998, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[6]  Matthew M. Holecko,et al.  Visualization of the intact interface between neural tissue and implanted microelectrode arrays , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  Wei He,et al.  Nanoscale neuro-integrative coatings for neural implants. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[8]  J. Hetke,et al.  Surface modification of neural recording electrodes with conducting polymer/biomolecule blends. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[9]  David C. Martin,et al.  In vivo studies of polypyrrole/peptide coated neural probes. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[10]  J. Arntorp,et al.  Effect of varying surface patterns on antibiotic elution from antibiotic-loaded bone cement. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  Justin C. Williams,et al.  Flexible polyimide-based intracortical electrode arrays with bioactive capability , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  K. Wise,et al.  A multichannel neural probe for selective chemical delivery at the cellular level , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Cerebral Astrocyte Response to Micromachined Silicon Implants , 1999, Experimental Neurology.

[14]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  Justin C. Williams,et al.  Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.