The preference effect in design concept evaluation

[1]  Alex Shaw,et al.  Children Apply Principles of Physical Ownership to Ideas , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  S. Vinodh,et al.  Sustainable concept selection using ELECTRE , 2012, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[3]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  The Bias Against Creativity , 2012, Psychological science.

[4]  David J. Turk,et al.  Mine and Me: Exploring the Neural Basis of Object Ownership , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  David J. Turk,et al.  Mine to remember: The impact of ownership on recollective experience , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Jérémy Legardeur,et al.  Lessons learned from an empirical study of the early design phases of an unfulfilled innovation , 2010 .

[7]  M. Lorenzen Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[8]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Easy on the mind, easy on the wallet: The roles of familiarity and processing fluency in valuation judgments , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Easy does it: The role of fluency in cue weighting , 2007 .

[10]  T. Connolly,et al.  Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[11]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  Pareto Frontier Based Concept Selection Under Uncertainty, with Visualization , 2005 .

[12]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior , 2004 .

[13]  R. Fischer,et al.  Standardization to Account for Cross-Cultural Response Bias , 2004 .

[14]  K. Stanovich The Psychology of Problem Solving: The Fundamental Computational Biases of Human Cognition: Heuristics That (Sometimes) Impair Decision Making and Problem Solving , 2003 .

[15]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research , 2003 .

[16]  R. Calantone,et al.  Escalation of commitment during new product development , 2002 .

[17]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations , 2001 .

[18]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[19]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[20]  H. Raiffa,et al.  The hidden traps in decision making. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[21]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Individual differences in rational thought. , 1998 .

[22]  Y. Asiedu,et al.  Product life cycle cost analysis: State of the art review , 1998 .

[23]  Karen M. Bursic,et al.  Verbal Protocol Analysis as a Method to Document Engineering Student Design Processes , 1998 .

[24]  J. A. Stoop,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[25]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Structured and opportunistic processing in design: a critical discussion , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  Ömer Akin,et al.  Design protocol data and novel design decisions , 1995 .

[27]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  The designer as a team o f one , 1995 .

[28]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The Proper Protocol: Validity and Completeness of Verbal Reports , 1994 .

[29]  James K. Beggan,et al.  Association as a Psychological Justification for Ownership , 1994 .

[30]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Positive illusions and well-being revisited: separating fact from fiction. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  James K. Beggan On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. , 1992 .

[32]  Stuart Pugh,et al.  Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering , 1991 .

[33]  Raymonde Guindon,et al.  Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic Thoughts , 1990, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Self-presentation by association. , 1989 .

[35]  R. Belk Possessions and the Extended Self , 1988 .

[36]  R. Cooper Predevelopment activities determine new product success , 1988 .

[37]  Elaine Kant,et al.  Understanding and Automating Algorithm Design , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

[38]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[39]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[40]  A. Tversky,et al.  Decision, probability, and utility: Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[41]  L. Furby Possession in humans: An exploratory study of its meaning and motivation. , 1978 .

[42]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Cognitive processes and ill-defined problems: a case study from design , 1969, IJCAI 1969.

[43]  Leon Litwinski,et al.  The Psychology of “Mine” , 1947, Philosophy.

[44]  Miko Laakso,et al.  Naturally emerging decision criteria in product concept evaluation , 2013 .

[45]  Miko Laakso,et al.  DUBIOUS ROLE OF FORMAL CREATIVITY TECHNIQUES IN PROFESSIONAL DESIGN , 2012 .

[46]  Dorian Marjanović,et al.  DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR IDEA SELECTION , 2012 .

[47]  Belinda López-Mesa,et al.  A study of the use of concept selection methods from inside a company , 2011 .

[48]  Ingrid Kihlander,et al.  Managing concept decision making in product development practice , 2011 .

[49]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Exploring problem decomposition in conceptual design among novice designers , 2009 .

[50]  Seppo Tella,et al.  Communication style and cultural features in high/low context communication cultures: a case study of Finland, Japan and India , 2008 .

[51]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review And Theoretical Analysis , 2006 .

[52]  G. Gigerenzer Bounded and rational , 2006 .

[53]  W. Chan,et al.  ANALYZING IPSATIVE DATA IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH , 2003 .

[54]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: Individual Differences in Reasoning: Implications for the Rationality Debate? , 2002 .

[55]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  The Exploration of Solution Options in Design: A ‘Naturalistic Decision Making’ Perspective. , 2001 .

[56]  Scott T. Allison,et al.  Possession enhancement in an interpersonal context: An extension of the mere ownership effect , 1999 .

[57]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Satisficing in engineering design: causes, consequences and implications for design support , 1998 .

[58]  M. Chi Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[59]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[60]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[61]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: On the psychology of prediction , 1982 .