Hearing Status and Language Fluency As Predictors of Automatic Word and Sign Recognition

In previous studies, evidence concerning the extent of automatic word recognition in deaf children and the influence of language fluency on word and sign recognition (as indexed by the Stroop task) has been contradictory. This study examined the effects of English and sign language fluency in the automatic word and sign recognition of deaf and hearing adults. Results indicated that responding in sign took longer and created more Stroop interference than responding orally. Two groups of certified interpreters revealed this finding to be independent of hearing status. Most important, deaf subjects showed greater automaticity in recognizing signs than words, whereas hearing subjects showed greater automaticity in recognizing words than signs. This pattern was unaffected by language fluency. The findings clarify the results of previous studies both theoretically and methodologically.

[1]  Hsuan-Chich Chen,et al.  Development of stroop interference in Chinese-English bilinguals , 1986 .

[2]  Peter V. Paul,et al.  Language and Deafness , 1984 .

[3]  K E Brasel,et al.  Influence of certain language and communication environments in early childhood on the development of language in deaf individuals. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  M. Marschark.  Automaticity in Word & Sign Recognition by Deaf Adults & Children , 2013 .

[5]  Automaticity in word recognition and in word naming by the deaf , 1983 .

[6]  Helmer R. Myklebust.  The Psychology of Deafness: Sensory Deprivation, Learning, and Adjustment , 1961 .

[7]  J. Kyle.  Reading development of deaf children , 1980 .

[8]  W. Lambert,et al.  Interlingual interference in a bilingual version of the Stroop color-word task. , 1969 .

[9]  E. Klima.  The signs of language , 1979 .

[10]  C. M. King,et al.  Reading and deafness , 1985 .

[11]  I. Fischler.  Word Recognition, Use of Context, and Reading Skill among Deaf College Students. , 1985 .

[12]  F. Dyer.  Color-naming interference in monolinguals and bilinguals , 1971 .

[13]  Jacqueline Leybaert,et al.  On automatic reading processes in the deaf , 1982 .

[14]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[15]  J. D. Fletcher,et al.  English as the Second Language of Deaf Children. , 1974 .

[16]  D. Allen.  Color-word interference in deaf and hearing children , 1971 .

[17]  M. Marschark,et al.  Psychological perspectives on deafness , 2014 .

[18]  L E Griswold,et al.  The expressive vocabulary of preschool deaf children. , 1974, American annals of the deaf.

[19]  P. Worchel,et al.  The Psychology of Deafness , 1961 .

[20]  Donald F. Moores.  Applications of 'Cloze' Procedures to the Assessment of Psycholinguistic Abilities of the Deaf , 1967 .

[21]  M. Marschark.  Psychological Development of Deaf Children , 1993 .

[22]  M. Karchmer,et al.  Deaf Children in America , 1986 .

[23]  M. Marschark,et al.  Linguistic flexibility in signed and written language productions of deaf children. , 1988, Journal of experimental child psychology.