Coordination of fingertip forces during human manipulation can emerge from independent neural networks controlling each engaged digit

Abstract We investigated the coordination of fingertip forces in subjects who lifted an object (i) using the index finger and thumb of their right hand, (ii) using their left and right index fingers, and (iii) cooperatively with another subject using the right index finger. The forces applied normal and tangential to the two parallel grip surfaces of the test object and the vertical movement of the object were recorded. The friction between the object and the digits was varied independently at each surface between blocks of trials by changing the materials covering the grip surfaces. The object’s weight and surface materials were held constant across consecutive trials. The performance was remarkably similar whether the task was shared by two subjects or carried out unimanually or bimanually by a single subject. The local friction was the main factor determining the normal:tangential force ratio employed at each digit-object interface. Irrespective of grasp configuration, the subjects adapted the force ratios to the local frictional conditions such that they maintained adequate safety margins against slips at each of the engaged digits during the various phases of the lifting task. Importantly, the observed force adjustments were not obligatory mechanical consequences of the task. In all three grasp configurations an incidental slip at one of the digits elicited a normal force increase at both engaged digits such that the normal:tangential force ratio was restored at the non-slipping digit and increased at the slipping digit. The initial development of the fingertip forces prior to object lift-off revealed that the subjects employed digit-specific anticipatory mechanisms using weight and frictional experiences in the previous trial. Because grasp stability was accomplished in a similar manner whether the task was carried out by one subject or cooperatively by two subjects, it was concluded that anticipatory adjustments of the fingertip forces can emerge from the action of anatomically independent neural networks controlling each engaged digit. In contrast, important aspects of the temporal coordination of the digits was organized by a “higher level” sensory – based control that influenced both digits. In lifts by single subjects this control was mast probably based on tactile and visual input and on communication between neural control mechanisms associated with each digit. In the two-subject grasp configuration this synchronization information was based on auditory and visual cues.

[1]  Roland S. Johansson,et al.  Sensory Control of Dexterous Manipulation in Humans , 1996 .

[2]  J. Abbs,et al.  Dynamic control of the perioral system during speech: kinematic analyses of autogenic and nonautogenic sensorimotor processes. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  R. Johansson,et al.  Independent control of human finger‐tip forces at individual digits during precision lifting. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  A. M. Smith,et al.  Responses of cerebellar Purkinje cells to slip of a hand-held object. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactile detection of slip: surface microgeometry and peripheral neural codes. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Johansson,et al.  Corticospinal control during reach, grasp, and precision lift in man , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Wiesendanger,et al.  Temporal Structure of a Bimanual Goal‐directed Movement Sequence in Monkeys , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Grip-load force coupling: a general control strategy for transporting objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  A physiological method for relaying frictional information to a human teleoperator , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  S. Rossignol,et al.  The locomotion of the low spinal cat. II. Interlimb coordination. , 1980, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  A. M. Smith,et al.  Primary motor cortical responses to perturbations of prehension in the monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Eric M. Rouiller,et al.  Bimanual Synergies in Primates , 1992 .

[13]  Pranab Kumar Sen,et al.  On a Class of Multivariate Multisample Rank Order Tests II: Tests for Homogeneity of Dispersion Matrices , 2015 .

[14]  A. M. Smith,et al.  Primary motor cortical activity related to the weight and texture of grasped objects in the monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  M Wiesendanger,et al.  Temporal coordination in bimanual actions. , 1994, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[16]  A. M. Smith,et al.  Purkinje cell simple spike activity during grasping and lifting objects of different textures and weights. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R S Johansson,et al.  Grasp stability during manipulative actions. , 1994, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[18]  Masamichi Kato,et al.  Interlimb Coordination during Locomotor Activities , 1994 .

[19]  Accepted April,et al.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension , 1991 .

[20]  H. Kinoshita,et al.  Individual finger forces acting on a grasped object during shaking actions. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[21]  R. Johansson,et al.  Influences of Cutaneous Sensory Input on the Motor Coordination During Precision Manipulation , 1984 .

[22]  H. Kinoshita,et al.  Contributions and co-ordination of individual fingers in multiple finger prehension. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[23]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Jeannerod Chapter 1 Object Oriented Action , 1994 .