Influence of contrast on foveal and peripheral detection of coherent motion in moving random-dot patterns.

The detection of coherent motion was studied in stroboscopically displayed moving random-dot patterns disturbed by incoherent noise. We determined the threshold signal-to-noise ratio S as a function of velocity V at eccentricities of 0 degrees, 3 degrees, 6 degrees, 12 degrees, 24 degrees, 48 degrees in the temporal visual field of the right eye. At each eccentricity the measurements of S = f(V) were repeated for a range of rms contrast values from 60% (0 dB) in steps of 3 dB down to 1.9% (-30 dB). All stimuli were scaled with eccentricity to keep the ratio of pixel size to acuity constant (about 2). It is shown that the S values in our paradigm are never determined by contrast-threshold effects. They are true correlational thresholds. Bilocal movement detectors are assumed to underlie the detection of coherent motion. The bilocal correlation proves to be rather insensitive to rms contrast down to contrast levels of about 10%. Despite the eccentricity scaling, which is quite effective at high contrast levels, differences between the eccentricities become noticeable at lower contrast levels (below about 30-20%). The fovea is the least, and the far periphery the most, resistent to contrast degradation.

[1]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The distribution of human motion detector properties in the monocular visual field , 1986, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Exterospecific component of the motion parallax field. , 1981, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Biological image motion processing: A review , 1985, Vision Research.

[4]  D Marr,et al.  Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  S. Anstis.  The perception of apparent movement. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  The structure of the human motion detection system , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Visibility of movement gradients , 1982, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  A. Johnston,et al.  Lower thresholds of motion for gratings as a function of eccentricity and contrast , 1985, Vision Research.

[9]  A. Johnston,et al.  Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect , 1985, Vision Research.

[10]  J. Simpson.  The accessory optic system. , 1984, Annual review of neuroscience.

[11]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Spatiotemporal integration in the detection of coherent motion , 1984, Vision Research.

[12]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Spatial and temporal parameters of motion detection in the peripheral visual field. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Perception of Movement and Correlation in Stroboscopically Presented Noise Patterns , 1985, Perception.

[14]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Detectability of velocity gradients in moving random-dot patterns , 1983, Vision Research.

[15]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Illusory motion in visual displays , 1984, Vision Research.

[16]  Enhanced visibility by regular motion of retinal images. , 1968 .

[17]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Detection of coherent movement in peripherally viewed random-dot patterns. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  D. Burr,et al.  Contrast sensitivity at high velocities , 1982, Vision Research.

[19]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Optical Velocity Patterns, Velocity-Sensitive Neurons, and Space Perception: A Hypothesis , 1974, Perception.

[20]  S. McKee,et al.  Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast , 1986, Vision Research.

[21]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  J. J. Koenderink,et al.  Spatial properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  O J Braddick,et al.  Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.