Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or everolimus for HER2-negative primary breast cancer (GBG 44-GeparQuinto)†.

BACKGROUND The GeparQuinto study showed that adding bevacizumab to 24 weeks of anthracycline-taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates overall and specifically in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). No difference in pCR rate was observed for adding everolimus to paclitaxel in nonearly responding patients. Here, we present disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (n = 1948) with HER2-negative tumors of a median tumor size of 4 cm were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant treatment with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (EC-T) with or without eight infusions of bevacizumab every 3 weeks before surgery. Patients without clinical response to EC ± Bevacizumab were randomized to 12 weekly cycles paclitaxel with or without everolimus 5 mg/day. To detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (α = 0.05, β = 0.8) 379 events had to be observed in the bevacizumab arms. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 3-year DFS was 80.8% and 3-year OS was 89.7%. Outcome was not different for patients receiving bevacizumab (HR 1.03; P = 0.784 for DFS and HR 0.974; P = 0.842 for OS) compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Patients with TNBC similarly showed no improvement in DFS (HR = 0.99; P = 0.941) and OS (HR = 1.02; P = 0.891) when treated with bevacizumab. No other predefined subgroup (HR+/HER2-; locally advanced (cT4 or cN3) or not; cT1-3 or cT4; pCR or not) showed a significant benefit. No difference in DFS (HR 0.997; P = 0.987) and OS (HR 1.11; P = 0.658) was observed for nonearly responding patients receiving paclitaxel with or without everolimus overall as well as in subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Long-term results, in opposite to the results of pCR, do not support the neoadjuvant use of bevacizumab in addition to an anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy or everolimus in addition to paclitaxel for nonearly responding patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER NCT 00567554, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

M. Rezai | T. Fehm | T. Kühn | M. Griesshammer | H. Tesch | H. Ulmer | S. Loibl | M. Untch | V. Nekljudova | J. Blohmer | G. von Minckwitz | J. Huober | C. Jackisch | C. Hanusch | C. Thomssen | D. Lampe | E. Stickeler | T. Reimer | H. Eidtmann | V. Müller | T. Decker | D. Strumberg | W. Janni | C. Solbach | W. Simon | K. Kast | C. Salat | B. Gerber | G. Minckwitz | P. Staib | E. Solomayer | C. Villena | P. Fasching | V. Möbus | B. Conrad | A. Belau | I. Schrader | R. Schlag | C. Schumacher | S. Kremers | M. Hofmann | F. Holms | P. Krabisch | A. Ober | F. Khandan | M. Hauschild | J. Bischoff | C. Mau | B. Aktas | J. Hackmann | M. Clemens | H. Eggemann | J. Potenberg | R. Lorenz | D. Sattler | C. Höss | M. Deryal | V. Heyl | D-M Burgmann | W. Weikel | I. Bauerfeind | T. Müller | C. Steffens | H. Link | O. Tomé | T. Steinmetz | G. Heinrich | T. Beck | H. Wagner | W. Bauer | K. Gnauert | C. Uleer | F. Overkamp | D. Augustin | D. Fischer | G. Hoffmann | S. Graßhoff | J. Tio | A. Kohls | T. Noesselt | U. Kronawitter | U. Kullmer | K. Kittel | G. Kunz | M. Wolfgarten | T. Lantzsch | E. Weiss | M. Just | U. Deichert | F. Lorenz-Salehi | M. Weigel | G. Doering | A. Stefek | B. Christensen | E. V. Abel | G. Feisel-Schwickardi | C. Nestle-Krämling | U. Groh | A. Tulusan | J. Schilling | C. Köhne | P. Weder | V. Rethwisch | S. Feidicker | F. Ruhland | I. Runnebaum | G. Emons | M. Sütterlin | B. Heinrich | W. Meinerz | W. Wiest | T. Dewitz | K. Latos | J. Deuker | L. Bauer | B. Liedtke | U. Bückner | D. Langanke | B. Rack | H. Tanzer | S. Lemster | J. Schuster | A. Nugent | U. Burkamp | A. Sallmann | M-L. Schmidt | G. Bartzke | T. Prätz | J. Terhaag | A. Abdallah | U. Mattner | K. Freese | M. Dietrich | I. Thalmann | A. Rossmann | S. Grasshoff | C.-H. Köhne

[1]  Gideon Blumenthal,et al.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[2]  W. Gradishar,et al.  Bevacizumab (Bv) in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer: Final results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E5103. , 2014 .

[3]  J. Baselga,et al.  Neoadjuvant and adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (NOAH): follow-up of a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  M. Rezai,et al.  Neoadjuvant bevacizumab and anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy in 678 triple-negative primary breast cancers; results from the geparquinto study (GBG 44). , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  William J. Gradishar,et al.  Response-Guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer , 2013 .

[6]  M. Parmar,et al.  Adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BEATRICE): primary results of a randomised, phase 3 trial. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[7]  M. Rezai,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel and everolimus in breast cancer patients with non-responsive tumours to epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC) ± bevacizumab - results of the randomised GeparQuinto study (GBG 44). , 2013, European journal of cancer.

[8]  J. Hecht,et al.  Bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer (AVANT): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  P. Fasching,et al.  Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  M. Rezai,et al.  Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  Tanja Fehm,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bevacizumab for HER2-negative breast cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  A. Tutt,et al.  Recommendations from an International Consensus Conference on the Current Status and Future of Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Primary Breast Cancer , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  S. Loibl,et al.  Neoadjuvant vinorelbine-capecitabine versus docetaxel-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in early nonresponsive breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio trial. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  S. Loibl,et al.  Intensified neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-responding breast cancer: phase III randomized GeparTrio study. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  Sally Hunsberger,et al.  Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.