Determining the Optimal Number of Ground Control Points for Varying Study Sites through Accuracy Evaluation of Unmanned Aerial System-Based 3D Point Clouds and Digital Surface Models

The rapid development of drone technologies, such as unmanned aerial systems (UASs) and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), has led to the widespread application of three-dimensional (3D) point clouds and digital surface models (DSMs). Due to the number of UAS technology applications across many fields, studies on the verification of the accuracy of image processing results have increased. In previous studies, the optimal number of ground control points (GCPs) was determined for a specific area of a study site by increasing or decreasing the amount of GCPs. However, these studies were mainly conducted in a single study site, and the results were not compared with those from various study sites. In this study, to determine the optimal number of GCPs for modeling multiple areas, the accuracy of 3D point clouds and DSMs were analyzed in three study sites with different areas according to the number of GCPs. The results showed that the optimal number of GCPs was 12 for small and medium sites (7 and 39 ha) and 18 for the large sites (342 ha) based on the overall accuracy. If these results are used for UAV image processing in the future, accurate modeling will be possible with minimal effort in GCPs.

[1]  Fei Wang,et al.  A multi-UAV cooperative route planning methodology for 3D fine-resolution building model reconstruction , 2018, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Terry L. Pavlis,et al.  An orientation based correction method for SfM-MVS point clouds—Implications for field geology , 2018 .

[3]  Soumendra Nath Kuiry,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of high-resolution topographic data generated using freely available packages based on SfM-MVS approach , 2018, Measurement.

[4]  Jon Miller,et al.  Analysis of UAS Flight Altitude and Ground Control Point Parameters on DEM Accuracy along a Complex, Developed Coastline , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[5]  G. Forlani,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Systems and DSM matching for rock glacier monitoring , 2017 .

[6]  Jan van Aardt,et al.  Influence of Drone Altitude, Image Overlap, and Optical Sensor Resolution on Multi-View Reconstruction of Forest Images , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[7]  Guilherme A. S. Pereira,et al.  Multi-UAV Routing for Area Coverage and Remote Sensing with Minimum Time , 2015, Sensors.

[8]  S. Coveney,et al.  Lightweight UAV digital elevation models and orthoimagery for environmental applications: data accuracy evaluation and potential for river flood risk modelling , 2017 .

[9]  Seung Woo Son,et al.  Integrating UAV and TLS Approaches for Environmental Management: A Case Study of a Waste Stockpile Area , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[10]  M. Cantarero,et al.  UAVs for volcano monitoring: A new approach applied on an active lava flow on Mt. Etna (Italy), during the 27 February–02 March 2017 eruption , 2019, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research.

[11]  Li Zhang,et al.  Multi-image matching for DSM generation from IKONOS imagery , 2006 .

[12]  Javier Cardenal,et al.  Measurement of Road Surface Deformation Using Images Captured from UAVs , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[13]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[14]  Alberto Pellegrinelli,et al.  Coastal Mapping Using DJI Phantom 4 RTK in Post-Processing Kinematic Mode , 2020, Drones.

[15]  S. Son,et al.  Optimal flight parameters for unmanned aerial vehicles collecting spatial information for estimating large-scale waste generation , 2019, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[16]  Jana Müllerová,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Digital Surface Models Derived from Optical Imagery Acquired with Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2019, Drones.

[17]  Mojca Kosmatin Fras,et al.  Spatial ETL for 3D Building Modelling Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data in Semi-Urban Areas , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Hiroya Yamano,et al.  Evaluation of DSMs generated from multi-temporal aerial photographs using emerging structure from motion–multi-view stereo technology , 2016 .

[19]  José Emilio Meroño de Larriva,et al.  An Analysis of the Influence of Flight Parameters in the Generation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Orthomosaicks to Survey Archaeological Areas , 2016, Sensors.

[20]  Soohee Han,et al.  On-Site vs. Laboratorial Implementation of Camera Self-Calibration for UAV Photogrammetry , 2016 .

[21]  Jan Skaloud,et al.  Bundle adjustment with raw inertial observations in UAV applications , 2017 .

[22]  Z. Gong,et al.  Relations between the Number of GCPs and Accuracy of UAV Photogrammetry in the Foreshore of the Sandy Beach , 2020, Journal of Coastal Research.

[23]  Mitchell D. Harley,et al.  UAVs for coastal surveying , 2016 .

[24]  Ruedi Boesch,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles' Imagery on Glaciers , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[25]  Derek T. Robinson,et al.  Mapping erosion and deposition in an agricultural landscape: Optimization of UAV image acquisition schemes for SfM-MVS , 2020 .

[26]  M. Mokroš,et al.  Accuracy of Photogrammetric UAV-Based Point Clouds under Conditions of Partially-Open Forest Canopy , 2017 .

[27]  Mostafa Rabah,et al.  Using RTK and VRS in direct geo-referencing of the UAV imagery , 2018, NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics.

[28]  Gianfranco Forlani,et al.  Quality Assessment of DSMs Produced from UAV Flights Georeferenced with On-Board RTK Positioning , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[29]  Z. Robinson,et al.  Too much of a good thing? the role of detailed UAV imagery in characterizing large-scale badland drainage characteristics in South-Eastern Spain , 2017 .

[30]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Digital ortho-images — a powerful tool for the extraction of spatial- and geo-information , 1996 .

[31]  Enoc Sanz-Ablanedo,et al.  Accuracy of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and SfM Photogrammetry Survey as a Function of the Number and Location of Ground Control Points Used , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[32]  S. Longmore,et al.  Thermal-Drones as a Safe and Reliable Method for Detecting Subterranean Peat Fires , 2019, Drones.

[33]  Anuar Ahmad,et al.  Assessment of Photogrammetric Mapping Accuracy Based on Variation Flying Altitude Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2014 .

[34]  Ľudovít Kovanič,et al.  Use of low-cost UAV photogrammetry to analyze the accuracy of a digital elevation model in a case study , 2016 .

[35]  Karen Anderson,et al.  Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology , 2013 .

[36]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Modeling the World from Internet Photo Collections , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[37]  Th. Toutin,et al.  DSM generation and evaluation from QuickBird stereo imagery with 3D physical modelling , 2004 .

[38]  Mozhdeh Shahbazi,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a UAV-Photogrammetry System for Precise 3D Environmental Modeling , 2015, Sensors.

[39]  Christophe Delacourt,et al.  Application of a Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) to the Study of the Séchilienne Landslide (Isère, France) , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[40]  Abdullah Abdullah,et al.  Locating emergent trees in a tropical rainforest using data from an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[41]  Miloš Rusnák,et al.  Template for high-resolution river landscape mapping using UAV technology , 2018 .

[42]  Izabela Karsznia,et al.  UAV-based detection and spatial analyses of periglacial landforms on Demay Point (King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica) , 2017 .

[43]  Anshuman Bhardwaj,et al.  Applications of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Cryosphere: Latest Advances and Prospects , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[44]  S. Robson,et al.  Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment , 2016 .

[45]  N. Rosser,et al.  Identifying the behavioural characteristics of clay cliffs using intensive monitoring and geotechnical numerical modelling , 2010 .

[46]  Fernando Carvajal-Ramírez,et al.  Assessment of UAV-photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation of ground control points , 2018, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[47]  George Leblanc,et al.  Accuracy of 3D Landscape Reconstruction without Ground Control Points Using Different UAS Platforms , 2020, Drones.

[48]  F. Agüera-Vega,et al.  Assessment of photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation ground control points number using unmanned aerial vehicle , 2017 .