How advances in neural recording affect data analysis

Over the last five decades, progress in neural recording techniques has allowed the number of simultaneously recorded neurons to double approximately every 7 years, mimicking Moore's law. Such exponential growth motivates us to ask how data analysis techniques are affected by progressively larger numbers of recorded neurons. Traditionally, neurons are analyzed independently on the basis of their tuning to stimuli or movement. Although tuning curve approaches are unaffected by growing numbers of simultaneously recorded neurons, newly developed techniques that analyze interactions between neurons become more accurate and more complex as the number of recorded neurons increases. Emerging data analysis techniques should consider both the computational costs and the potential for more accurate models associated with this exponential growth of the number of recorded neurons.

[1]  R A Normann,et al.  Chronic intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of cat sensory cortex using the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array. , 1999, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[3]  Uri T Eden,et al.  A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  T. Blanche,et al.  Polytrodes: high-density silicon electrode arrays for large-scale multiunit recording. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  The Structure of Multi-Neuron Firing Patterns in Primate Retina , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Brendon O. Watson,et al.  Spike inference from calcium imaging using sequential Monte Carlo methods. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[7]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  R. Kass,et al.  Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Techniques for extracting single-trial activity patterns from large-scale neural recordings , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  Liam Paninski,et al.  Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design. , 2007, Progress in brain research.

[11]  R. Kass,et al.  Spline‐based non‐parametric regression for periodic functions and its application to directional tuning of neurons , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  Andrew M. Clark,et al.  Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis Methods for Neural Ensemble Recordings, Second Edition , 2007 .

[14]  R. K. Simpson Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .

[15]  Lee E Miller,et al.  Inferring functional connections between neurons , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus , 2003, Nature.

[17]  Viviana Trezza,et al.  Toward Understanding the Neurobiology of Social Attachment: Role of Estrogen Receptors in the Medial Amygdala , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Nicholas T. Carnevale,et al.  Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: A review of tools and strategies , 2006, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[19]  Robert E. Kass Guest editorial: analysis of neural data , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[20]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Local field potentials indicate network state and account for neuronal response variability , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[21]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[22]  R E Kass,et al.  Recursive bayesian decoding of motor cortical signals by particle filtering. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J. Anthony Movshon,et al.  Comparison of Recordings from Microelectrode Arrays and Single Electrodes in the Visual Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[25]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Bayesian brain : probabilistic approaches to neural coding , 2006 .

[26]  J. Csicsvari,et al.  Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Methods for Neural Ensemble Recordings , 1998 .

[28]  L. Abbott,et al.  Neural network dynamics. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  L. Paninski,et al.  A generalized linear model of the impact of direct and indirect inputs to the lateral geniculate nucleus. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[30]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Decorrelated Neuronal Firing in Cortical Microcircuits , 2010, Science.

[31]  L. Paninski Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models , 2004, Network.

[32]  M S Lewicki,et al.  A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. , 1998, Network.

[33]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Gaussian-process factor analysis for low-dimensional single-trial analysis of neural population activity , 2008, NIPS.

[34]  Lee E. Miller,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[35]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Neuronal Interactions Improve Cortical Population Coding of Movement Direction , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  A. Pouget,et al.  Neural correlations, population coding and computation , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[37]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Pairwise Maximum Entropy Models for Studying Large Biological Systems: When They Can Work and When They Can't , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  H. Vaughan,et al.  A new multielectrode array for the simultaneous recording of field potentials and unit activity. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  J. H. Schuenemeyer,et al.  Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.) , 1992 .

[40]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Chronic, multisite, multielectrode recordings in macaque monkeys , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  C. Stosiek,et al.  In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Nicholas Hatsopoulos,et al.  Decoding continuous and discrete motor behaviors using motor and premotor cortical ensembles. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  Christos H. Papadimitriou,et al.  Computational complexity , 1993 .

[44]  M. Wilson,et al.  Analyzing Functional Connectivity Using a Network Likelihood Model of Ensemble Neural Spiking Activity , 2005, Neural Computation.

[45]  J. Krüger,et al.  Simultaneous recording with 30 microelectrodes in monkey visual cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Wei Wu,et al.  A new look at state-space models for neural data , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[47]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Collective dynamics in human and monkey sensorimotor cortex: predicting single neuron spikes , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  M. A. Smith,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Scales of Neuronal Correlation in Primary Visual Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Robert E Kass,et al.  Statistical issues in the analysis of neuronal data. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Ian H. Stevenson,et al.  Bayesian Inference of Functional Connectivity and Network Structure From Spikes , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.