A Study on Tangible Participative Enterprise Modelling

Enterprise modelling (EM) is concerned with discovering, structuring and representing domain knowledge pertaining to different aspects of an organization. Participative EM, in particular, is a useful approach to eliciting this knowledge from domain experts with different backgrounds. In related work, tangible modelling – modelling with physical objects – has been identified as beneficial for group modelling.

[1]  Kurt Sandkuhl,et al.  Enterprise Modeling: Tackling Business Challenges with the 4EM Method , 2014 .

[2]  Janis Stirna,et al.  An Explorative Study into the Influence of Business Goals on the Practical Use of Enterprise Modelling Methods and Tools , 2002 .

[3]  M. Çakır Constructivist Approaches to Learning in Science and Their Implications for Science Pedagogy: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[4]  Janis Stirna,et al.  Ten Years Plus with EKD: Reflections from Using an Enterprise Modeling Method in Practice , 2007, EMMSAD.

[5]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[6]  Bhuvan Unhelkar,et al.  The Quality Strategy for UML , 2005 .

[7]  Ulf Seigerroth,et al.  Enterprise Modeling for Business and IT Alignment: Challenges and Recommendations , 2014, Int. J. IT Bus. Alignment Gov..

[8]  Markus Kohlbacher,et al.  Intuitive Comprehensibility of Process Models , 2013, S-BPM ONE.

[9]  P. Robinson Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework , 2001 .

[10]  M. C. van der Voort,et al.  The Procedure Usability Game: A Participatory Game for the Development of Complex Medical Procedures & Products , 2009 .

[11]  Mathias Weske,et al.  Tangible Business Process Modeling - Methodology and Experiment Design , 2009, Business Process Management Workshops.

[12]  Gwendolyn L. Kolfschoten,et al.  Challenges in collaborative modelling: a literature review and research agenda , 2008, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[13]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Kurt Sandkuhl,et al.  Participative Enterprise Modeling: Experiences and Recommendations , 2007, CAiSE.

[15]  Roel Wieringa,et al.  Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering , 2014, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[16]  Arne Sølvberg,et al.  Understanding quality in conceptual modeling , 1994, IEEE Software.

[17]  Colette Rolland,et al.  Using EKD-CMM electronic guide book for managing change in organisations , 1999 .

[18]  Werner Schmidt,et al.  Tangible or Not Tangible - A Comparative Study of Interaction Types for Process Modeling Support , 2014, HCI.

[19]  Jonathan A. Edelman,et al.  Tangible Business Process Modeling : A New Approach , 2010 .

[20]  Alexander Lübbe,et al.  Tangible business process modeling : design and evaluation of a process model elicitation Technique , 2011 .

[21]  Ken Hinckley,et al.  Synchronous gestures for multiple persons and computers , 2003, UIST '03.

[22]  Roel Wieringa,et al.  Tangible Modelling to Elicit Domain Knowledge: An Experiment and Focus Group , 2015, ER.

[23]  Joseph Barjis Collaborative, Participative and Interactive Enterprise Modeling , 2009, ICEIS.

[24]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Agnès Front,et al.  A Participative End-User Modeling Approach for Business Process Requirements , 2014, BMMDS/EMMSAD.

[26]  André P. Calitz,et al.  The usability of collaborative tools: application to business process modelling , 2013, SAICSIT '13.